pata-rb532-cf: platform_get_irq() failure ignored
PATCH 1/1 pata-rb532-cf: platform_get_irq() failure ignored
------------------------------>8-------------8<--------------------------------- platform_get_irq() can return -ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an unsigned int, it does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found.
---
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +3 -2
@@ -173,11 +173,12 @@ static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return -EINVAL ; } - irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); -if (irq <=0 ) { + ret =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); +if (ret <=0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ resource found\n" );return -ENOENT ; } + irq = ret; gpio =irq_to_gpio (irq);if (gpio <0 ) {
Quoted 14 lines · Roel Kluin
------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
platform_get_irq()can return-ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an unsigned int, it does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found.Signed-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>---
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +0
-0@@ -173,11 +173,12 @@ static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return -EINVAL ; }
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 183
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +3
-2- irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); -if (irq <=0 ) { + ret =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); +if (ret <=0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ resource found\n" );return -ENOENT ; } + irq = ret; gpio =irq_to_gpio (irq);
ACK from Phil or Florian?
Hi,
Quoted 26 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 25 lines · Roel Kluin
------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
platform_get_irq()can return-ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an unsigned int, it
does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found.Signed-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>---
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +3
-2@@ -173,11 +173,12 @@ static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return -EINVAL ; } - irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); -if (irq <=0 ) { + ret =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); +if (ret <=0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ resource found\n" );return -ENOENT ; } + irq = ret;
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 183
Quoted 1 line
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +0
-0gpio =irq_to_gpio (irq);ACK from Phil or Florian?
That's fine for me, though I didn't test it (I managed to break my build-machine somehow, in an attempt to having the mainboard properly grounded).
One could simplify the patch by making the variable 'irq' be signed instead of unsigned. This would also prevent "abusing" the variable 'ret'. What do you think?
Greetings, Phil
Hi,
Le Friday 06 March 2009 17:43:18 Phil Sutter, vous avez écrit :
Quoted 33 lines
Hi,
Quoted 26 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 25 lines · Roel Kluin
------------------------------>8-------------8<------------------------- --------
platform_get_irq()can return-ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an unsigned int, it
does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found.Signed-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>---
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +3
-2@@ -173,11 +173,12 @@ static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -EINVAL; } - irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); -if (irq <=0 ) { + ret =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); +if (ret <=0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ resource found\n" );return -ENOENT ; } + irq = ret;Quoted 3 lines
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c static __devinit int · line 184
Quoted 1 line
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +0
-0gpio =irq_to_gpio (irq);ACK from Phil or Florian?
Quoted 7 lines
That's fine for me, though I didn't test it (I managed to break my build-machine somehow, in an attempt to having the mainboard properly grounded).
One could simplify the patch by making the variable 'irq' be signed instead of unsigned. This would also prevent "abusing" the variable 'ret'. What do you think?
I agree with this proposal, abusing the ret value is not that good. What about the patch below :
--
From: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pata-rb532-cf: platform_get_irq() failure ignored
platform_get_irq() can return -ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an unsigned int, it does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found. Make irq an int so that we can use a single variable to test the platform_get_irq() return value.
--
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +1 -1
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void rb532_pata_setup_ports(struct ata_host *ah)static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { -unsigned int irq; +int irq;int gpio;struct resource *res;struct ata_host *ah;
Hi,
Quoted 1 line · Florian Fainelli
I agree with this proposal, abusing the ret value is not that good. What about the patch below :
That's exactly what I meant. Thanks for preparing the patch!
Greetings, Phil
Jeff Garzik
AppliedQuoted 61 lines · Florian Fainelli
Hi,
Le Friday 06 March 2009 17:43:18 Phil Sutter, vous avez écrit :
Quoted 31 lines
Hi,
Quoted 26 lines · Jeff Garzik
Quoted 25 lines · Roel Kluin
------------------------------>8-------------8<------------------------- --------
platform_get_irq()can return-ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an unsigned int, it
does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found.Signed-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>---
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +3
-2@@ -173,11 +173,12 @@ static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -EINVAL; } - irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); -if (irq <=0 ) { + ret =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); +if (ret <=0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ resource found\n" );return -ENOENT ; } + irq = ret;Quoted 2 lines
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c static __devinit int · line 184
Quoted 1 line
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +0
-0gpio =irq_to_gpio (irq);ACK from Phil or Florian?
Quoted 7 lines
That's fine for me, though I didn't test it (I managed to break my build-machine somehow, in an attempt to having the mainboard properly grounded).
One could simplify the patch by making the variable 'irq' be signed instead of unsigned. This would also prevent "abusing" the variable 'ret'. What do you think?
I agree with this proposal, abusing the ret value is not that good. What about the patch below :
--
From: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pata-rb532-cf:platform_get_irq()failure ignored
platform_get_irq()can return-ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an unsigned int, it does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found. Make irq an int so that we can use a single variable to test theplatform_get_irq()return value.Signed-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Phil Sutter <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>--
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +0
-0
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c static void rb532_pata_setup_ports(struct ata_host *ah) · line 166
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c +1
-1@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void rb532_pata_setup_ports(struct ata_host *ah)static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { -unsigned int irq; +int irq;int gpio;struct resource *res;struct ata_host *ah;
applied