x25: bit and/or confusion?
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 x25: bit and/or confusion?
Could it be that something like this was intended?
net/x25/af_x25.c +1 -1
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static int x25_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) facilities.throughput > 0xDD)break ;if (facilities.reverse && - (facilities.reverse |0x81 )!=0x81 ) + (facilities.reverse &0x81 ) !=0x81 )break ; x25->facilities = facilities; rc =0 ;