RAID 5 build time optimization question and experiments.
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 15 lines · Cat'Killer
Quoted 9 lines
I found a way using Doug Gilbert's great sg3utils to zero all these disks in a very efficient manner, using
sgp_dd, at near drive bandwidth, and proceeded to zero all the disks fully in about 4 hours!Once done, I then created a RAID 5 on 10 disks, waited for the rebuild to complete, stopped the array using mdadm, and dumped each of the RAID's components superblocks to files.
<-snip->
Quoted 4 lines
The create worked fine and I waited for the rebuild to be complete before stopping the array and dumping the SBs.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I then proceeded to write these same superblocks to 10 new similar disks in a different system.
You could just do the create with --assume-clean, which should take very little time at all. If the drives were zeroed initially then this will give you valid parity data.
Thank you for this, that's exactly what I was looking for. I had looked in the manpage beforehand but I did not search for the right terms nor assumed this would work in case of an array created ontop of zeroed drives.
Thanks again.
Ben.
Quoted 11 lines
Cheers,
Robin--
___ ( ' } | Robin Hill <[email protected]> |
/ / ) | Little Jim says .... | // !! | "He fallen in de water !!" |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 42 lines · Cat'Killer
Quoted 15 lines · Cat'Killer
Quoted 9 lines
I found a way using Doug Gilbert's great sg3utils to zero all these disks in a very efficient manner, using
sgp_dd, at near drive bandwidth, and proceeded to zero all the disks fully in about 4 hours!Once done, I then created a RAID 5 on 10 disks, waited for the rebuild to complete, stopped the array using mdadm, and dumped each of the RAID's components superblocks to files.
<-snip->
Quoted 4 lines
The create worked fine and I waited for the rebuild to be complete before stopping the array and dumping the SBs.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I then proceeded to write these same superblocks to 10 new similar disks in a different system.
You could just do the create with --assume-clean, which should take very little time at all. If the drives were zeroed initially then this will give you valid parity data.
Thank you for this, that's exactly what I was looking for. I had looked in the manpage beforehand but I did not search for the right terms nor assumed this would work in case of an array created ontop of zeroed drives.
Thanks again.
Ben.
Quoted 11 lines
Cheers,
Robin--
___ ( ' } | Robin Hill <[email protected]> |
/ / ) | Little Jim says .... | // !! | "He fallen in de water !!" |
Quoted 5 lines
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yes, I had just come to a similar conclusion in a recent email series and even provided a patch against the git copy of the manpage to clarify the documentation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html