Skip to contentSkip to conversation

what should I use for "unassigned" ports?

DISCUSSION Anthony Ewell 4 participants 5 messages Jan 6, 2010 – Jan 7, 2010

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi All,

A long time ago, I used

     unassgn=1024:65535

for my unassigned ports. As in

--sport $unassgn

Having taken a more recent look at "/etc/services", I am finding zillions of service ports above 1024.

With that in mind, is there a better starting port for my "unassigned" ports?

Many thanks,
-T

Signature · 3 lines
-------------------------
I Fish.  Therefore, I am.
-------------------------
#1 lore raw

2010/1/6 Anthony Ewell <[email protected]>:

Quoted 6 lines

Having taken a more recent look at "/etc/services", I am finding zillions of service ports above 1024.

With that in mind, is there a better starting port for my "unassigned" ports?

Sadly these days nope - the assigned port numbers are now all over the place.

However, alot of them are not likely to be in use on your system so you ought to define your unassigned port range by what you are actually running not by the contents of /etc/services (same goes for protocols).

Signature · 5 lines
Richard Horton
Users are like a virus: Each causing a thousand tiny crises until the
host finally dies.
http://www.solstans.co.uk - Solstans Japanese Bobtails and Norwegian Forest Cats
http://www.pbase.com/arimus - My online photogallery
#4 lore raw
In reply to Anthony Ewell

2010/1/6 Anthony Ewell <[email protected]>:

Quoted 8 lines

Hi All,

Having taken a more recent look at "/etc/services", I am finding zillions of service ports above 1024.

With that in mind, is there a better starting port for my "unassigned" ports?

If you are purely trying to block traffic which is to services not running then you could just change the default policies to drop and then only explicitly allow what you want which is alot safer.

If you need this for logging then place a log rule as the last rule in the table.

Signature · 5 lines
Richard Horton
Users are like a virus: Each causing a thousand tiny crises until the
host finally dies.
http://www.solstans.co.uk - Solstans Japanese Bobtails and Norwegian Forest Cats
http://www.pbase.com/arimus - My online photogallery
#2 lore raw
In reply to Richard Horton
Quoted 9 lines · Richard Horton

2010/1/6 Anthony Ewell<[email protected]>:

Quoted 6 lines

Having taken a more recent look at "/etc/services", I am finding zillions of service ports above 1024.

With that in mind, is there a better starting port for my "unassigned" ports?

Quoted 6 lines

Sadly these days nope - the assigned port numbers are now all over the place.

However, alot of them are not likely to be in use on your system so you ought to define your unassigned port range by what you are actually running not by the contents of /etc/services (same goes for protocols).

So, pick the highest port I use and go somewhat above that. That will work. Thank you!

-T