btrfs: should add a permission check for setfacl
PATCH 1/1 btrfs: should add a permission check for setfacl
On btrfs, do the following
------------------
# su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we should prohibit it that user2 changing user1's acl. In fact, on ext3 and other fs, a message occurs: setfacl: aaa: Operation not permitted
This patch fixed it.
---
fs/btrfs/acl.c +3 -0
@@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ static int btrfs_xattr_set_acl(struct inode *inode, int type,int ret;struct posix_acl *acl =NULL ; +if (!is_owner_or_cap (inode)) +return -EPERM ; +if (value) { acl =posix_acl_from_xattr (value, size);if (acl ==NULL ) {
Quoted 18 lines · Shi Weihua
On btrfs, do the following
------------------# su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1
Quoted 8 lines
# group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we should prohibit it that user2 changing user1's acl. In fact, on ext3 and other fs, a message occurs: setfacl: aaa: Operation not permitted
Can you add this as a new testcase to xfstests so that we can easiy check for regressions and future filesystems implementing this correctly?
cc xfstests ml
Quoted 28 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 18 lines · Shi Weihua
On btrfs, do the following
------------------# su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1Quoted 8 lines
# group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we should prohibit it that user2 changing user1's acl. In fact, on ext3 and other fs, a message occurs: setfacl: aaa: Operation not permitted
Quoted 4 lines
Can you add this as a new testcase to xfstests so that we can easiy check for regressions and future filesystems implementing this correctly?
did it. maybe it should be merged into 051 or 099.
---
230 +80 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +#! /bin/bash +# FS QA Test No. 230 +# +# Check user B can setfacl a file which belongs to user A +# See also http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=127434445620298&w=2 +# +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# Copyright (c) 2010 FUJITSU LIMITED. All Rights Reserved. +# +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as +# published by the Free Software Foundation. +# +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +# GNU General Public License for more details. +# +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA +# +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# +# creator [email protected] + +seq=`basename $0` +echo "QA output created by $seq" + +here=`pwd` +tmp=/tmp/$$ +runas=$here/src/runas +status=1 # FAILure is the default! +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 + +# get standard environment, filters and checks +. ./common.rc +. ./common.filter +. ./common.attr + +_cleanup() +{ + cd / + rm -f $tmp.* + [ -n "$testdir" ] && rm -rf $testdir/$seq.dir1 + _cleanup_testdir +} + +# real QA test starts here +_supported_fs generic +# only Linux supports fallocate +_supported_os Linux + +[ -x $runas ] || _notrun "$runas executable not found" + +rm -f $seq.full + +_setup_testdir + +_need_to_be_root +_acl_setup_ids +_require_acls + +# get dir +cd $testdir +rm -rf $seq.dir1 +mkdir $seq.dir1 +cd $seq.dir1 + +touch file1 +chown $acl1.$acl1 file1 + +echo "Expect to FAIL" +$runas -u $acl2 -g $acl2 -- `which setfacl` -m u::rwx file1 2>&1 + +echo "Test over." +# success, all done +status=0 +exit
230.out +4 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +QA output created by 230 +Expect to FAIL +setfacl: file1: Operation not permitted +Test over.
group +1 -0
@@ -343,3 +343,4 @@ deprecated 227 auto fsr 228 rw auto prealloc quick 229 auto +230 acl auto
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Thanks! I've commit both patches.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs