i2c: Multiplexed I2C bus core support
Subsystems (3)
PATCH v3 1/1 i2c: Multiplexed I2C bus core support
Add multiplexed bus core support. I2C multiplexer and switches like pca954x get instantiated as new adapters per port.
---
Based on kernel 2.6.35.rc2 +
[PATCH] i2c: Move adapter locking helpers to i2c-core
by Jean Delware <[email protected]>
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/6226/match=i2c+move+adapter+locking+helpers+i2c+core>
drivers/i2c/Kconfig | 11 +++ drivers/i2c/Makefile | 1 + drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++---- drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c | 44 +++++++++++- drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/i2c-mux.h | 46 ++++++++++++ include/linux/i2c.h | 8 ++ 7 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) create mode 100755 drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c create mode 100755 include/linux/i2c-mux.h
drivers/i2c/Kconfig +11 -0
@@ -47,6 +47,17 @@ config I2C_CHARDEV This support is also available as a module. If so, the module will be called i2c-dev. +config I2C_MUX + tristate "I2C bus multiplexing support" + depends on EXPERIMENTAL + help + Say Y here if you want the I2C core to support the ability to + handle multiplexed I2C bus topologies, by presenting each + multiplexed segment as a I2C adapter. + + This support is also available as a module. If so, the module + will be called i2c-mux. + config I2C_HELPER_AUTO bool "Autoselect pertinent helper modules" default y
drivers/i2c/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO) += i2c-boardinfo.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C) += i2c-core.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SMBUS) += i2c-smbus.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV) += i2c-dev.o +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX) += i2c-mux.o obj-y += algos/ busses/ ifeq ($(CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE),y)
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +3 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,9 @@/* With some changes from Kyösti Mälkki <[email protected]>. All SMBus-related things are written by Frodo Looijaard <[email protected]> SMBus 2.0 support by Mark Studebaker <mdsxyz123-/[email protected]> and -Jean Delvare <[email protected]> */ +Jean Delvare <[email protected]> +Mux support by Rodolfo Giometti <giometti-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> and +Michael Lawnick <[email protected]> */ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -417,10 +419,52 @@ static int __i2c_check_addr_busy(struct device
*dev, void *addrp)
return 0;
}
+/* walk up mux tree */
+static int i2c_check_mux_parents(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int addr) +{
+ int result;
+
+ result = device_for_each_child(&adapter->dev, &addr,
+ __i2c_check_addr_busy);
+
+ if (!result && i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter))
+ result = i2c_check_mux_parents(
+ to_i2c_adapter(adapter->dev.parent), addr);
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/* recurse down mux tree */
+static int i2c_check_mux_children(struct device *dev, void *addrp) +{
+ int result;
+
+ if (dev->type == &i2c_adapter_type)
+ result = device_for_each_child(dev, addrp,
+ i2c_check_mux_children);
+ else
+ result = __i2c_check_addr_busy(dev, addrp);
+
+ return result;
+}
+
static int i2c_check_addr_busy(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int addr) {
- return device_for_each_child(&adapter->dev, &addr,
- __i2c_check_addr_busy);
+ int result = 0;
+
+ i2c_lock_adapter(adapter);
+
+ if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter))
+ result = i2c_check_mux_parents(
+ to_i2c_adapter(adapter->dev.parent), addr);
+
+ if (!result)
+ result = device_for_each_child(&adapter->dev, &addr,
+ i2c_check_mux_children);
+
+ i2c_unlock_adapter(adapter);
+
+ return result;
}
/**
@@ -429,7 +473,10 @@ static int i2c_check_addr_busy(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int addr)
*/
void i2c_lock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
{
- rt_mutex_lock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+ if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter))
+ i2c_lock_adapter(to_i2c_adapter(adapter->dev.parent));
+ else
+ rt_mutex_lock(&adapter->bus_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);
@@ -439,7 +486,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);
*/
static int i2c_trylock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter) {
- return rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+ if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter))
+ return i2c_trylock_adapter(to_i2c_adapter(adapter->dev.parent));
+ else
+ return rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
}
/**
@@ -448,7 +498,10 @@ static int i2c_trylock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
*/
void i2c_unlock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
{
- rt_mutex_unlock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+ if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter))
+ i2c_unlock_adapter(to_i2c_adapter(adapter->dev.parent));
+ else
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&adapter->bus_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_unlock_adapter);
@@ -656,9 +709,9 @@ i2c_sysfs_new_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
return -EINVAL;
/* Keep track of the added device */
- i2c_lock_adapter(adap);
+ rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock);
list_add_tail(&client->detected, &adap->userspace_clients);
- i2c_unlock_adapter(adap);
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
dev_info(dev, "%s: Instantiated device %s at 0x%02hx\n", "new_device",
info.type, info.addr);
@@ -697,7 +750,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
/* Make sure the device was added through sysfs */ res = -ENOENT;
- i2c_lock_adapter(adap);
+ rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(client, next, &adap->userspace_clients,
detected) {
if (client->addr == addr) {
@@ -710,7 +763,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
break;
}
}
- i2c_unlock_adapter(adap);
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
if (res < 0)
dev_err(dev, "%s: Can't find device in list\n",
@@ -737,10 +790,11 @@ static const struct attribute_group *i2c_adapter_attr_groups[] = {
NULL
};
-static struct device_type i2c_adapter_type = {
+struct device_type i2c_adapter_type = {
.groups = i2c_adapter_attr_groups,
.release = i2c_adapter_dev_release,
};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_adapter_type);
#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_COMPAT
static struct class_compat *i2c_adapter_compat_class;
@@ -995,7 +1049,7 @@ int i2c_del_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
return res;
/* Remove devices instantiated from sysfs */
- i2c_lock_adapter(adap);
+ rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(client, next, &adap->userspace_clients,
detected) {
dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "Removing %s at 0x%x\n", client->name,
@@ -1003,7 +1057,7 @@ int i2c_del_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
list_del(&client->detected); i2c_unregister_device(client);
}
- i2c_unlock_adapter(adap);
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
/* Detach any active clients. This can't fail, thus we do not
checking the returned value. */
drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c +0 -0
@@ -193,12 +193,54 @@ static int i2cdev_check(struct device *dev, void
*addrp)
return dev->driver ? -EBUSY : 0;
}
+/* walk up mux tree */
+static int i2cdev_check_mux_parents(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int addr) +{
+ int result;
+
+ result = device_for_each_child(&adapter->dev, &addr, i2cdev_check);
+
+ if (!result && i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter))
+ result = i2cdev_check_mux_parents(
+ to_i2c_adapter(adapter->dev.parent), addr);
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/* recurse down mux tree */
+static int i2cdev_check_mux_children(struct device *dev, void *addrp) +{
+ int result;
+
+ if (dev->type == &i2c_adapter_type)
+ result = device_for_each_child(dev, addrp,
+ i2cdev_check_mux_children);
+ else
+ result = i2cdev_check(dev, addrp);
+
+ return result;
+}
+
/* This address checking function differs from the one in i2c-core
in that it considers an address with a registered device, but no driver bound to it, as NOT busy. */
static int i2cdev_check_addr(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned int
addr)
{
- return device_for_each_child(&adapter->dev, &addr, i2cdev_check);
+ int result = 0;
+
+ i2c_lock_adapter(adapter);
+
+ if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter))
+ result = i2cdev_check_mux_parents(
+ to_i2c_adapter(adapter->dev.parent), addr);
+
+ if (!result)
+ result = device_for_each_child(&adapter->dev, &addr,
+ i2cdev_check_mux_children);
+
+ i2c_unlock_adapter(adapter);
+
+ return result;
}
static noinline int i2cdev_ioctl_rdrw(struct i2c_client *client,
drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c new file +8 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +/* +* Multiplexed I2C bus driver. +* +* Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]> +* Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Eurotech S.p.A. <[email protected]> +* Copyright (c) 2009-2010 NSN GmbH & Co KG <[email protected]> +* +* Simplifies access to complex multiplexed I2C bus topologies, by
presenting
+ * each multiplexed bus segment as an additional I2C adapter.
+ * Supports multi-level mux'ing (mux behind a mux).
+ *
+ * Based on:
+ * i2c-virt.c from Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
+ * i2c-virtual.c from Ken Harrenstien, Copyright (c) 2004 Google, Inc.
+ * i2c-virtual.c from Brian Kuschak <bkuschak-/[email protected]>
+ *
+ * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
+ * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
+ * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/i2c-mux.h>
+
+/* multiplexer per channel data */
+struct i2c_mux_priv {
+ struct i2c_adapter adap;
+ struct i2c_algorithm algo;
+
+ struct i2c_adapter *parent;
+ void *mux_dev; /* the mux chip/device */
+ u32 chan_id; /* the channel id */
+
+ int (*select)(struct i2c_adapter *, void *mux_dev, u32 chan_id);
+ int (*deselect)(struct i2c_adapter *, void *mux_dev, u32 chan_id);
+};
+
+static int i2c_mux_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
+ struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
+{
+ struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data;
+ struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->parent;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Switch to the right mux port and perform the transfer. */
+
+ ret = priv->select(parent, priv->mux_dev, priv->chan_id);
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ ret = parent->algo->master_xfer(parent, msgs, num);
+ if (priv->deselect)
+ priv->deselect(parent, priv->mux_dev, priv->chan_id);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int i2c_mux_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
+ u16 addr, unsigned short flags, + char read_write, u8 command, + int size, union i2c_smbus_data *data)
+{
+ struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data;
+ struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->parent;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Select the right mux port and perform the transfer. */
+
+ ret = priv->select(parent, priv->mux_dev, priv->chan_id);
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ ret = parent->algo->smbus_xfer(parent, addr, flags,
+ read_write, command, size, data);
+ if (priv->deselect)
+ priv->deselect(parent, priv->mux_dev, priv->chan_id);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* Return the parent's functionality */
+static u32 i2c_mux_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
+{
+ struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data;
+ struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->parent;
+
+ return parent->algo->functionality(parent);
+}
+
+struct i2c_adapter *i2c_add_mux_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *parent,
+ void *mux_dev, u32 force_nr, u32 chan_id,
+ int (*select) (struct i2c_adapter *,
+ void *, u32),
+ int (*deselect) (struct i2c_adapter *,
+ void *, u32))
+{
+ struct i2c_mux_priv *priv;
+ int ret;
+
+ priv = kzalloc(sizeof(struct i2c_mux_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Set up private adapter data */
+ priv->parent = parent;
+ priv->mux_dev = mux_dev;
+ priv->chan_id = chan_id;
+ priv->select = select;
+ priv->deselect = deselect;
+
+ /* Need to do algo dynamically because we don't know ahead
+ * of time what sort of physical adapter we'll be dealing with.
+ */
+ if (parent->algo->master_xfer)
+ priv->algo.master_xfer = i2c_mux_master_xfer;
+ if (parent->algo->smbus_xfer)
+ priv->algo.smbus_xfer = i2c_mux_smbus_xfer;
+ priv->algo.functionality = i2c_mux_functionality;
+
+ /* Now fill out new adapter structure */
+ snprintf(priv->adap.name, sizeof(priv->adap.name),
+ "i2c-%d-mux (chan_id %d)", i2c_adapter_id(parent), chan_id);
+ priv->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ priv->adap.id = parent->id;
+ priv->adap.algo = &priv->algo;
+ priv->adap.algo_data = priv;
+ priv->adap.dev.parent = &parent->dev;
+
+ if (force_nr) {
+ priv->adap.nr = force_nr;
+ ret = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(&priv->adap);
+ } else {
+ ret = i2c_add_adapter(&priv->adap);
+ }
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&parent->dev,
+ "failed to add mux-adapter (error=%d)\n",
+ ret);
+ kfree(priv);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ dev_info(&parent->dev, "Added multiplexed i2c bus %d\n",
+ i2c_adapter_id(&priv->adap));
+
+ return &priv->adap;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_add_mux_adapter);
+
+int i2c_del_mux_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
+{
+ struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = i2c_del_adapter(adap);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ kfree(priv);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_del_mux_adapter);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("I2C driver for multiplexed I2C busses"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
include/linux/i2c-mux.h new file +46 -0
46 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/i2c.h +1 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@#include <linux/of.h> /* for struct device_node */ extern struct bus_type i2c_bus_type; +extern struct device_type i2c_adapter_type;/* --- General options ------------------------------------------------ */
@@ -374,6 +375,13 @@ static inline void i2c_set_adapdata(struct
i2c_adapter *dev, void *data)
dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, data);
}
+static inline int i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(const struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
+{
+ return adapter->dev.parent != NULL
+ && adapter->dev.parent->bus == &i2c_bus_type
+ && adapter->dev.parent->type == &i2c_adapter_type;
+}
+
/* Adapter locking functions, exported for shared pin cases */ void i2c_lock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *);
void i2c_unlock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *);
Signature · 1 line
Michael Lawnick
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Hi Michael,
Quoted 11 lines
Add multiplexed bus core support. I2C multiplexer and switches like pca954x get instantiated as new adapters per port.
Signed-off-by Michael Lawnick <demx1175@wbit01lx.(none)>Cc Jean Delvare <[email protected]>---
Based on kernel 2.6.35.rc2 +
[PATCH] i2c: Move adapter locking helpers to i2c-core
by Jean Delware <[email protected]>
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/6226/match=i2c+move+adapter+locking+helpers+i2c+core>
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/i2c/Kconfig | 11 +++ drivers/i2c/Makefile | 1 + drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++---- drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c | 44 +++++++++++- drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 165+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As you can see, your e-mail client wrapped long lines again. I had to manually fix the patch so that I could apply it...
Quoted 5 lines
include/linux/i2c-mux.h | 46 ++++++++++++ include/linux/i2c.h | 8 ++ 7 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) create mode 100755 drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c create mode 100755 include/linux/i2c-mux.h
A few comments below, just FYI. Nothing for you to do, the rest is up to me I think. Thanks :)
Quoted 90 lines
drivers/i2c/Kconfig +11
-0@@ -47,6 +47,17 @@ config I2C_CHARDEV This support is also available as a module. If so, the module will be called i2c-dev. +config I2C_MUX + tristate "I2C bus multiplexing support" + depends on EXPERIMENTAL + help + Say Y here if you want the I2C core to support the ability to + handle multiplexed I2C bus topologies, by presenting each + multiplexed segment as a I2C adapter. + + This support is also available as a module. If so, the module + will be called i2c-mux. + config I2C_HELPER_AUTO bool "Autoselect pertinent helper modules" default ydrivers/i2c/Makefile +1
-0@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO) += i2c-boardinfo.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C) += i2c-core.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SMBUS) += i2c-smbus.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV) += i2c-dev.o +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX) += i2c-mux.o obj-y += algos/ busses/ ifeq ($(CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE),y)drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +35
-3@@ -20,7 +20,9 @@/* With some changes from Kyösti Mälkki <[email protected]>. All SMBus-related things are written by Frodo Looijaard <[email protected]> SMBus 2.0 support by Mark Studebaker <mdsxyz123-/[email protected]> and -Jean Delvare <[email protected]> */ +Jean Delvare <[email protected]> +Mux support by Rodolfo Giometti <giometti-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> and +Michael Lawnick <[email protected]> */ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> @@ -417,10 +419,52 @@ static int __i2c_check_addr_busy(struct device *dev, void *addrp)return 0 ; } +/* walk up mux tree */ +static int i2c_check_mux_parents (struct i2c_adapter *adapter,int addr) +{ +int result; + + result =device_for_each_child (&adapter->dev, &addr, + __i2c_check_addr_busy); + +if (!result &&i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter (adapter)) + result =i2c_check_mux_parents ( +to_i2c_adapter (adapter->dev.parent), addr); + +return result; +} + +/* recurse down mux tree */ +static int i2c_check_mux_children (struct device *dev,void *addrp) +{ +int result; + +if (dev->type == &i2c_adapter_type) + result =device_for_each_child (dev, addrp, + i2c_check_mux_children); +else + result =__i2c_check_addr_busy (dev, addrp); + +return result; +} +static int i2c_check_addr_busy (struct i2c_adapter *adapter,int addr) { -return device_for_each_child (&adapter->dev, &addr, - __i2c_check_addr_busy); +int result =0 ; + +i2c_lock_adapter (adapter);
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c static int __i2c_check_addr_busy(struct device · line 466
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +10
-0+ +if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter (adapter)) + result =i2c_check_mux_parents ( +to_i2c_adapter (adapter->dev.parent), addr); + +if (!result) + result =device_for_each_child (&adapter->dev, &addr, + i2c_check_mux_children); + +i2c_unlock_adapter (adapter);
I'm not convinced by your locking model. Surrounding only this function with i2c_lock/unlock_adapter() doesn't really help anything, does it? As soon as the function returns, anyone can enter the check section again, while the actual device has not yet been registered and will thus not be found by device_for_each_child().
I believe that the lock should be taken, and released, in the calling function, that is in i2c_new_device(). The lock should be taken right before calling i2c_check_addr_busy(), and released only after device_register() has been called.
For the other calling sites (i2c_detect_address and i2c_new_probed_device), I'm not even sure we need to take the lock at all. I am told that the low-level driver core code should be able to cope with device_remove() being called in the middle of device_for_each_child(). My reading of the low-level code couldn't confirm this, but I am no expert of that part of the kernel.
I'm also unsure if the adapter's lock is the right lock to use. This lock is supposed to be used to serialize I/O on the adapter. There's no reason to stop I/O on the adapter just because a new client is being registered. And thinking about it some more, it could even deadlock, is the driver's probe() function does I/O (and it often does.) The core i2c lock may be suitable, even though I admit it is an abuse too, as the problem we are trying to solve is really local to the specific adapter tree and not subsystem-wide (but OTOH, the i2c core lock is used infrequently enough that it shouldn't be a problem in practice.)
Anyway, I didn't expect you to solve this problem anyway. It was there before you added mux support, so it's not your problem ;)
Quoted 46 lines
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +2
-0+ +return result; }/**
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +12
-3@@ -429,7 +473,10 @@ static int i2c_check_addr_busy(struct i2c_adapter*adapter, int addr) */ void i2c_lock_adapter (struct i2c_adapter *adapter) { -rt_mutex_lock (&adapter->bus_lock); +if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter (adapter)) +i2c_lock_adapter (to_i2c_adapter (adapter->dev.parent)); +else +rt_mutex_lock (&adapter->bus_lock); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (i2c_lock_adapter);@@ -439,7 +486,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);*/ static int i2c_trylock_adapter (struct i2c_adapter *adapter) { -return rt_mutex_trylock (&adapter->bus_lock); +if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter (adapter)) +return i2c_trylock_adapter (to_i2c_adapter (adapter->dev.parent)); +else +return rt_mutex_trylock (&adapter->bus_lock); }/** @@ -448,7 +498,10 @@ static int i2c_trylock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter*adapter) */ void i2c_unlock_adapter (struct i2c_adapter *adapter) { -rt_mutex_unlock (&adapter->bus_lock); +if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter (adapter)) +i2c_unlock_adapter (to_i2c_adapter (adapter->dev.parent)); +else +rt_mutex_unlock (&adapter->bus_lock); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (i2c_unlock_adapter);@@ -656,9 +709,9 @@ i2c_sysfs_new_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c i2c_sysfs_new_device(struct device *dev, struct · line 717
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +2
-2return -EINVAL ;/* Keep track of the added device */ -i2c_lock_adapter (adap); +rt_mutex_lock (&adap->bus_lock);list_add_tail (&client->detected, &adap->userspace_clients); -i2c_unlock_adapter (adap); +rt_mutex_unlock (&adap->bus_lock);dev_info (dev,"%s: Instantiated device %s at 0x%02hx\n" ,"new_device" , info.type, info.addr);
I expected us to just use i2c_lock/unlock_adapter() everywhere for simplicity. Now I have to agree that using the segment's mutex works too, as the operation is both local to the mutex and unrelated to the other use cases of i2c_lock/unlock_adapter(). But it becomes a little tricky, so it should be all documented clearly (which I will do, don't worry.)
Quoted 366 lines
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +1
-1@@ -697,7 +750,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, structdevice_attribute *attr,/* Make sure the device was added through sysfs */ res = -ENOENT ; -i2c_lock_adapter (adap); +rt_mutex_lock (&adap->bus_lock);list_for_each_entry_safe (client, next, &adap->userspace_clients, detected) {drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +1
-1if (client->addr == addr) {@@ -710,7 +763,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, structdevice_attribute *attr, break; } } -i2c_unlock_adapter (adap); +rt_mutex_unlock (&adap->bus_lock);if (res <0 )drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +2
-1dev_err(dev, "%s: Can't find device in list\n",@@ -737,10 +790,11 @@ static const struct attribute_group *i2c_adapter_attr_groups[] = {NULL }; -static struct device_type i2c_adapter_type = { +struct device_type i2c_adapter_type = { .groups = i2c_adapter_attr_groups, .release = i2c_adapter_dev_release, }; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (i2c_adapter_type);#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_COMPAT static struct
class_compat*i2c_adapter_compat_class;drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +2
-2@@ -995,7 +1049,7 @@ int i2c_del_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)return res;/* Remove devices instantiated from sysfs */ -i2c_lock_adapter (adap); +rt_mutex_lock (&adap->bus_lock);list_for_each_entry_safe (client, next, &adap->userspace_clients, detected) { dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "Removing %s at 0x%x\n", client->name,@@ -1003,7 +1057,7 @@ int i2c_del_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)list_del (&client->detected);i2c_unregister_device (client); } -i2c_unlock_adapter (adap); +rt_mutex_unlock (&adap->bus_lock);/* Detach any active clients. This can't fail, thus we do not checking the returned value. */ drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c +43
-1@@ -193,12 +193,54 @@ static int i2cdev_check(struct device *dev, void *addrp)return dev->driver ? -EBUSY :0 ; } +/* walk up mux tree */ +static int i2cdev_check_mux_parents (struct i2c_adapter *adapter,int addr) +{ +int result; + + result =device_for_each_child (&adapter->dev, &addr, i2cdev_check); + +if (!result &&i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter (adapter)) + result =i2cdev_check_mux_parents ( +to_i2c_adapter (adapter->dev.parent), addr); + +return result; +} + +/* recurse down mux tree */ +static int i2cdev_check_mux_children (struct device *dev,void *addrp) +{ +int result; + +if (dev->type == &i2c_adapter_type) + result =device_for_each_child (dev, addrp, + i2cdev_check_mux_children); +else + result =i2cdev_check (dev, addrp); + +return result; +} +/* This address checking function differs from the one in i2c-core in that it considers an address with a registered device, but no driver bound to it, as NOT busy. */ static int i2cdev_check_addr (struct i2c_adapter *adapter,unsigned int addr) { -return device_for_each_child (&adapter->dev, &addr, i2cdev_check); +int result =0 ; + +i2c_lock_adapter (adapter); + +if (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter (adapter)) + result =i2cdev_check_mux_parents ( +to_i2c_adapter (adapter->dev.parent), addr); + +if (!result) + result =device_for_each_child (&adapter->dev, &addr, + i2cdev_check_mux_children); + +i2c_unlock_adapter (adapter); + +return result; }static noinline int i2cdev_ioctl_rdrw(struct
i2c_client*client,drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c new file +8
-0@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +/* +* Multiplexed I2C bus driver. +* +* Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]> +* Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Eurotech S.p.A. <[email protected]> +* Copyright (c) 2009-2010 NSN GmbH & Co KG <[email protected]> +* +* Simplifies access to complex multiplexed I2C bus topologies, by presenting
+ * each multiplexed bus segment as an additional I2C adapter.
+ * Supports multi-level mux'ing (mux behind a mux).
+ *
+ * Based on:
+ *i2c-virt.cfrom Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
+ *i2c-virtual.cfrom Ken Harrenstien, Copyright (c) 2004 Google, Inc.
+ *i2c-virtual.cfrom Brian Kuschak <bkuschak-/[email protected]>
+ *
+ * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
+ * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
+ * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
+ */drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c new file +145
-0+ +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/i2c-mux.h> + +/* multiplexer per channel data */ +struct i2c_mux_priv { +struct i2c_adapter adap; +struct i2c_algorithm algo; + +struct i2c_adapter *parent; +void *mux_dev;/* the mux chip/device */ +u32 chan_id;/* the channel id */ + +int (*select)(struct i2c_adapter *,void *mux_dev,u32 chan_id); +int (*deselect)(struct i2c_adapter *,void *mux_dev,u32 chan_id); +}; + +static int i2c_mux_master_xfer (struct i2c_adapter *adap, +struct i2c_msg msgs[],int num) +{ +struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data; +struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->parent; +int ret; + +/* Switch to the right mux port and perform the transfer. */ + + ret = priv->select (parent, priv->mux_dev, priv->chan_id); +if (ret >=0 ) + ret = parent->algo->master_xfer (parent, msgs, num); +if (priv->deselect) + priv->deselect (parent, priv->mux_dev, priv->chan_id); + +return ret; +} + +static int i2c_mux_smbus_xfer (struct i2c_adapter *adap, +u16 addr,unsigned short flags, +char read_write,u8 command, +int size,union i2c_smbus_data *data) +{ +struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data; +struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->parent; +int ret; + +/* Select the right mux port and perform the transfer. */ + + ret = priv->select (parent, priv->mux_dev, priv->chan_id); +if (ret >=0 ) + ret = parent->algo->smbus_xfer (parent, addr, flags, + read_write, command, size, data); +if (priv->deselect) + priv->deselect (parent, priv->mux_dev, priv->chan_id); + +return ret; +} + +/* Return the parent's functionality */ +static u32 i2c_mux_functionality (struct i2c_adapter *adap) +{ +struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data; +struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->parent; + +return parent->algo->functionality (parent); +} + +struct i2c_adapter *i2c_add_mux_adapter (struct i2c_adapter *parent, +void *mux_dev,u32 force_nr,u32 chan_id, +int (*select) (struct i2c_adapter *, +void *,u32 ), +int (*deselect) (struct i2c_adapter *, +void *,u32 )) +{ +struct i2c_mux_priv *priv; +int ret; + + priv =kzalloc (sizeof (struct i2c_mux_priv ),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!priv) +return NULL ; + +/* Set up private adapter data */ + priv->parent = parent; + priv->mux_dev = mux_dev; + priv->chan_id = chan_id; + priv->select = select; + priv->deselect = deselect; + +/* Need to do algo dynamically because we don't know ahead +* of time what sort of physical adapter we'll be dealing with. +*/ +if (parent->algo->master_xfer) + priv->algo.master_xfer = i2c_mux_master_xfer; +if (parent->algo->smbus_xfer) + priv->algo.smbus_xfer = i2c_mux_smbus_xfer; + priv->algo.functionality = i2c_mux_functionality; + +/* Now fill out new adapter structure */ +snprintf (priv->adap.name,sizeof (priv->adap.name), +"i2c-%d-mux (chan_id %d)" ,i2c_adapter_id (parent), chan_id); + priv->adap.owner =THIS_MODULE ; + priv->adap.id = parent->id; + priv->adap.algo = &priv->algo; + priv->adap.algo_data = priv; + priv->adap.dev.parent = &parent->dev; + +if (force_nr) { + priv->adap.nr = force_nr; + ret =i2c_add_numbered_adapter (&priv->adap); + }else { + ret =i2c_add_adapter (&priv->adap); + } +if (ret <0 ) { +dev_err (&parent->dev, +"failed to add mux-adapter (error=%d)\n" , + ret); +kfree (priv); +return NULL ; + } + +dev_info (&parent->dev,"Added multiplexed i2c bus %d\n" , +i2c_adapter_id (&priv->adap)); + +return &priv->adap; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (i2c_add_mux_adapter); + +int i2c_del_mux_adapter (struct i2c_adapter *adap) +{ +struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data; +int ret; + + ret =i2c_del_adapter (adap); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +kfree (priv); + +return 0 ; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (i2c_del_mux_adapter); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("I2C driver for multiplexed I2C busses" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL v2" );include/linux/i2c-mux.h new file +46
-0@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +/* +* +* i2c-mux.h - functions for the i2c-bus mux support +* +* Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]> +* Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Eurotech S.p.A. <[email protected]> +* Michael Lawnick <[email protected]> +* +* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +* (at your option) any later version. +* +* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +* GNU General Public License for more details. +* +* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software +* Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. +*/ + +#ifndef _LINUX_I2C_MUX_H +#define _LINUX_I2C_MUX_H + +#ifdef __KERNEL__ + +/* +* Called to create a i2c bus on a multiplexed bus segment. +* The mux_dev and chan_id parameters are passed to the select +* and deselect callback functions to perform hardware-specific +* mux control. +*/ +struct i2c_adapter *i2c_add_mux_adapter (struct i2c_adapter *parent, +void *mux_dev,u32 force_nr,u32 chan_id, +int (*select) (struct i2c_adapter *adap, +void *mux_dev,u32 chan_id), +int (*deselect) (struct i2c_adapter *, +void *mux_dev,u32 chan_id)); + +int i2c_del_mux_adapter (struct i2c_adapter *adap); + +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ + +#endif /* _LINUX_I2C_MUX_H */ include/linux/i2c.h +8
-0@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@#include <linux/of.h> /* for struct device_node */ extern struct bus_type i2c_bus_type; +extern struct device_type i2c_adapter_type;/* --- General options ------------------------------------------------ */ @@ -374,6 +375,13 @@ static inline void i2c_set_adapdata(struct i2c_adapter *dev, void *data)dev_set_drvdata (&dev->dev, data); } +static inline int i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter (const struct i2c_adapter *adapter) +{ +return adapter->dev.parent !=NULL + && adapter->dev.parent->bus == &i2c_bus_type + && adapter->dev.parent->type == &i2c_adapter_type; +} +/* Adapter locking functions, exported for shared pin cases */ void
i2c_lock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *);
voidi2c_unlock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *);
Signature · 1 line
Jean Delvare
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Jean Delvare said the following:
Quoted 7 lines
Hi Michael,
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 165Quoted 1 line
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As you can see, your e-mail client wrapped long lines again. I had to manually fix the patch so that I could apply it...
I'm really sorry about that :-(
I've tested it by sending to an alternative address and it worked. No idea where this wrap comes from.
...
Quoted 39 lines
Review i2c_sysfs_new_device(struct device *dev, struct · line 717
Quoted 13 lines
(quoted diff) +2
-2@@ -656,9 +709,9 @@ i2c_sysfs_new_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return -EINVAL; /* Keep track of the added device */ - i2c_lock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock); list_add_tail(&client->detected, &adap->userspace_clients); - i2c_unlock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock); dev_info(dev, "%s: Instantiated device %s at 0x%02hx\n", "new_device", info.type, info.addr);I expected us to just use i2c_lock/unlock_adapter() everywhere for simplicity. Now I have to agree that using the segment's mutex works too, as the operation is both local to the mutex and unrelated to the other use cases of i2c_lock/unlock_adapter(). But it becomes a little tricky, so it should be all documented clearly (which I will do, don't worry.)
Quoted 18 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -697,7 +750,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, /* Make sure the device was added through sysfs */ res = -ENOENT; - i2c_lock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(client, next, &adap->userspace_clients, detected) {(quoted diff) +1
-1if (client->addr == addr) {@@ -710,7 +763,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, break; } } - i2c_unlock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0if (res < 0)dev_err(dev, "%s: Can't find device in list\n",
In i2c_sysfs_delete_device you need a local lock, otherwise you'll get a deadlock on removing sub-clients/tree. This in turn brings the local lock to i2c_sysfs_new_device().
Thank you for your review.
ToDo after release: Inventing mux-adapter-name definition in mux-client code instead of mux-code. You were right in your last review, this is terribly necessary.
Signature · 2 lines
KR Michael Lawnick
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 40 lines · Michael Lawnick
Jean Delvare said the following:
Quoted 39 lines
Review i2c_sysfs_new_device(struct device *dev, struct · line 717
Quoted 13 lines
(quoted diff) +2
-2@@ -656,9 +709,9 @@ i2c_sysfs_new_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return -EINVAL; /* Keep track of the added device */ - i2c_lock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock); list_add_tail(&client->detected, &adap->userspace_clients); - i2c_unlock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock); dev_info(dev, "%s: Instantiated device %s at 0x%02hx\n", "new_device", info.type, info.addr);I expected us to just use i2c_lock/unlock_adapter() everywhere for simplicity. Now I have to agree that using the segment's mutex works too, as the operation is both local to the mutex and unrelated to the other use cases of i2c_lock/unlock_adapter(). But it becomes a little tricky, so it should be all documented clearly (which I will do, don't worry.)
Quoted 18 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -697,7 +750,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, /* Make sure the device was added through sysfs */ res = -ENOENT; - i2c_lock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(client, next, &adap->userspace_clients, detected) {(quoted diff) +1
-1if (client->addr == addr) {@@ -710,7 +763,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, break; } } - i2c_unlock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0if (res < 0)dev_err(dev, "%s: Can't find device in list\n",
In
i2c_sysfs_delete_deviceyou need a local lock, otherwise you'll get a deadlock on removing sub-clients/tree. This in turn brings the local lock toi2c_sysfs_new_device().
This is only relevant if the device instantiated / removed from user-space is an I2C mux chip, right?
Please remember that i2c_lock_adapter() and rt_mutex_lock() might do exactly the same, if applied to the root segment of an I2C tree. So if i2c_lock_adapter() would deadlock, I fear that a simple rt_mutex_lock() might deadlock too. So in the end we might have to introduce another mutex dedicated to protecting the adapter->userspace_clients list. Maybe we should have done this from the beginning...
Quoted 4 lines
Thank you for your review.
ToDo after release: Inventing mux-adapter-name definition in mux-client code instead of mux-code. You were right in your last review, this is terribly necessary.
OK.
Signature · 1 line
Jean Delvare
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Jean Delvare said the following:
Quoted 30 lines · Michael Lawnick
Quoted 19 lines
Jean Delvare said the following:
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -697,7 +750,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, /* Make sure the device was added through sysfs */ res = -ENOENT; - i2c_lock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(client, next, &adap->userspace_clients, detected) {(quoted diff) +1
-1if (client->addr == addr) {@@ -710,7 +763,7 @@ i2c_sysfs_delete_device(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, break; } } - i2c_unlock_adapter(adap); + rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0if (res < 0)dev_err(dev, "%s: Can't find device in list\n",
In
i2c_sysfs_delete_deviceyou need a local lock, otherwise you'll get a deadlock on removing sub-clients/tree. This in turn brings the local lock toi2c_sysfs_new_device().This is only relevant if the device instantiated / removed from user-space is an I2C mux chip, right?
Quoted 7 lines
Please remember that
i2c_lock_adapter()andrt_mutex_lock()might do exactly the same, if applied to the root segment of an I2C tree. So ifi2c_lock_adapter()would deadlock, I fear that a simplert_mutex_lock()might deadlock too. So in the end we might have to introduce another mutex dedicated to protecting theadapter->userspace_clientslist. Maybe we should have done this from the beginning...
Nearly missed this. Have not yet looked into your ftp link, so don't know whether it is still relevant, but anyway:
The difference above is that rt_mutex_lock locks the (mux-)adapter only while i2c_lock_adapter locks the root-adapter. So if a parent mux is unloaded there is no conflict with children.
Signature · 1 line
Michael Lawnick
Hi Michael,
Quoted 11 lines · Michael Lawnick
Add multiplexed bus core support. I2C multiplexer and switches like pca954x get instantiated as new adapters per port.
Signed-off-by Michael Lawnick <demx1175@wbit01lx.(none)>Cc Jean Delvare <[email protected]>---
Based on kernel 2.6.35.rc2 +
[PATCH] i2c: Move adapter locking helpers to i2c-core
by Jean Delware <[email protected]>
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/6226/match=i2c+move+adapter+locking+helpers+i2c+core>
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/i2c/Kconfig | 11 +++ drivers/i2c/Makefile | 1 + drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++---- drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c | 44 +++++++++++- drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/i2c-mux.h | 46 ++++++++++++ include/linux/i2c.h | 8 ++ 7 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) create mode 100755 drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c create mode 100755 include/linux/i2c-mux.h
Patch applied, with two changes:
* Reverted changes to i2c_sysfs_new_device(), i2c_sysfs_delete_device() and i2c_del_adapter() - no longer needed after I added a dedicated mutex for userspace client lists.
* Removed locking in i2c_check_addr_busy() and i2cdev_check_addr(). It was insufficient anyway, I'll think of something better and add it later.
Rodoflo, I've added your Acked-by, I hope this is fine.
Resulting patch can be seen here:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/i2c-multiplexing-core-support.patch
Thanks again for your contribution and patience :)
Signature · 1 line
Jean Delvare
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 9 lines · Jean Delvare
Hi Michael,
Patch applied, with two changes:
* Reverted changes toi2c_sysfs_new_device(),i2c_sysfs_delete_device()andi2c_del_adapter()- no longer needed after I added a dedicated mutex for userspace client lists.
* Removed locking ini2c_check_addr_busy()andi2cdev_check_addr(). It was insufficient anyway, I'll think of something better and add it later.
Great! :)
Quoted 1 line
Rodoflo, I've added your Acked-by, I hope this is fine.
It's ok for me.
Quoted 4 lines
Resulting patch can be seen here:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/i2c-multiplexing-core-support.patchThanks again for your contribution and patience :)
Michael, maybe you wish updating the linux-i2c wiki page regarding this issue?
https://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/I2C_bus_multiplexing
Ciao,
Rodolfo
Signature · 5 lines
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Linux Device Driver [email protected] Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127 UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti Freelance ICT Italia - Consulente ICT Italia - www.consulenti-ict.it
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20100722064243.GB9753-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Quoted 4 lines · Rodolfo Giometti
Michael, maybe you wish updating the linux-i2c wiki page regarding this issue?
Or maybe you could do it, Rodolfo? Michael is apparently busy and so am I.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Jean Delvare
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 8 lines · Jean Delvare
Quoted 4 lines · Rodolfo Giometti
Michael, maybe you wish updating the linux-i2c wiki page regarding this issue?
Or maybe you could do it, Rodolfo? Michael is apparently busy and so am I.
It's ok for me. I just suggested Michael since he did the last (hard) work but if you agree I have no problem in doing it. :)
Ciao,
Rodolfo
Signature · 5 lines
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Linux Device Driver [email protected] Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127 UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti Freelance ICT Italia - Consulente ICT Italia - www.consulenti-ict.it
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20100810170525.GA17506-h5F9bMWSfx92wUeKyQHPq0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
Rodolfo Giometti said the following:
Quoted 5 lines · Jean Delvare
Quoted 4 lines · Rodolfo Giometti
Quoted 3 lines
Michael, maybe you wish updating the linux-i2c wiki page regarding this issue?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Or maybe you could do it, Rodolfo? Michael is apparently busy and so am I.
It's ok for me. I just suggested Michael since he did the last (hard) work but if you agree I have no problem in doing it. :)
Just came out of vacation.
Yes, I'm busy in my project, so I would be glad if you could do it. If there are any questions you might PM me.
Signature · 2 lines
KR Michael
Hi everyone,
Quoted 5 lines · Michael Lawnick
Add multiplexed bus core support. I2C multiplexer and switches like pca954x get instantiated as new adapters per port.
Signed-off-by Michael Lawnick<demx1175@wbit01lx.(none)>Cc Jean Delvare<khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
I noticed that when you have multiple muxes connected to the same branch, implementation hides some information about the complete i2c topology.
So for instance if I have something like (notice there are three PCA9544's "in parallel", each with its own address, which I assume is a bit unusual):
# CPU (i2c-0)
# '--I2C Mux0 (PCA9547) @ 0x70
# +--Port0 (i2c-1) # +--Port1 (i2c-2) # +--Port2 (i2c-3) # +--Port3 (i2c-4) # +--Port4 (i2c-5) # | '--- I2C Mux1 (PCA9544) @ 0x74 # | | +--Port0 (i2c-9) # | | +--Port1 (i2c-10) # | | +--Port2 (i2c-11) # | | '--Port3 (i2c-12) # | +--- I2C Mux2 (PCA9544) @ 0x71 # | | +--Port0 (i2c-13) # | | +--Port1 (i2c-14) # | | +--Port2 (i2c-15) # | | '--Port3 (i2c-16) # | '--- I2C Mux3 (PCA9544) @ 0x72 # | +--Port0 (i2c-17) # | +--Port1 (i2c-18) # | +--Port2 (i2c-19) # | '--Port3 (i2c-20) # +--Port5 (i2c-6) # +--Port6 (i2c-7) # '--Port7 (i2c-8)
under /sys/bus/i2c/devices/ I get:
0-0010 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0010 0-0011 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0011 0-0070 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070 5-0071 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/5-0071 5-0072 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/5-0072 5-0074 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/5-0074 |2c-0 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0 i2c-1 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-1 i2c-2 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-2 i2c-3 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-3 i2c-4 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-4 i2c-5 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5 i2c-6 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-6 i2c-7 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-7 i2c-8 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-8 i2c-9 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-9 i2c-10 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-10 i2c-11 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-11 i2c-12 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-12 i2c-13 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-13 i2c-14 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-14 i2c-15 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-15 i2c-16 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-16 i2c-17 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-17 i2c-18 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-18 i2c-19 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-19 i2c-20 -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/i2c-5/i2c-20
So I have no way of telling that:
i2c-{9,10,11,12} are connected to mux1 at address 0x74 of i2c-5 i2c-{13,14,15,16} are connected to mux2 at address 0x71 of i2c-5 i2c-{17,18,19,20} are connected to mux3 at address 0x72 of i2c-5
because I get:
# cat /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-9/name i2c-5-mux (chan_id 0) # cat /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-13/name i2c-5-mux (chan_id 0)
which only reveals i2c-9 is the bus segment connected to channel 0 of a mux behind i2c-5, but since there's two of them, I have no way to tell which one...
So I guess the easiest thing to do would be to add this information within the .name attribute, though I fear this may somehow turn out not as trivial at it looks.
What I'd like most though would be to get some hierarchy as follows:
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/i2c-5/5-0071/i2c-9 devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/i2c-5/5-0071/i2c-10 devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/i2c-5/5-0071/i2c-11 devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/i2c-5/5-0071/i2c-12
or even something like:
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-0(=>...i2c-9) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-1(=>...i2c-10) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-2(=>...i2c-11) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-3(=>...i2c-12)
Would the above seem reasonable?
Thanks!
Gerlando
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Am 13.02.2013 16:36, schrieb Gerlando Falauto:
Quoted 34 lines
Hi everyone,
Quoted 5 lines · Michael Lawnick
Add multiplexed bus core support. I2C multiplexer and switches like pca954x get instantiated as new adapters per port.
Signed-off-by Michael Lawnick<demx1175@wbit01lx.(none)>Cc Jean Delvare<khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>I noticed that when you have multiple muxes connected to the same branch, implementation hides some information about the complete i2c topology.
So for instance if I have something like (notice there are three PCA9544's "in parallel", each with its own address, which I assume is a bit unusual):
# CPU (i2c-0)
# '--I2C Mux0 (PCA9547) @0x70# +--Port0 (i2c-1) # +--Port1 (i2c-2) # +--Port2 (i2c-3) # +--Port3 (i2c-4) # +--Port4 (i2c-5) # | '--- I2C Mux1 (PCA9544) @ 0x74 # | | +--Port0 (i2c-9) # | | +--Port1 (i2c-10) # | | +--Port2 (i2c-11) # | | '--Port3 (i2c-12) # | +--- I2C Mux2 (PCA9544) @ 0x71 # | | +--Port0 (i2c-13) # | | +--Port1 (i2c-14) # | | +--Port2 (i2c-15) # | | '--Port3 (i2c-16)
...
Quoted 7 lines
which only reveals i2c-9 is the bus segment connected to channel 0 of a mux behind i2c-5, but since there's two of them, I have no way to tell which one...
So I guess the easiest thing to do would be to add this information within the .name attribute, though I fear this may somehow turn out not as trivial at it looks.
Jean already detected this problem when mux code was brought into kernel, but solution was postponed until someone gets enough pain ;-) On my project I do no automatic i2c detection, but all is controlled via user space. So I always know where and which devices and buses get connected.
Quoted 5 lines
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-0(=>...i2c-9) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-1(=>...i2c-10) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-2(=>...i2c-11) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-3(=>...i2c-12)
Introducing links to sub-buses, named with respective channel id sounds good for me. Beside that your link example does not reflect your ASCII graphics of course ;-)
Signature · 2 lines
KR Michael
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Hi Michael,
first of all thanks for your answer :-)
Quoted 3 lines · Michael Lawnick
On my project I do no automatic i2c detection, but all is controlled via user space. So I always know where and which devices and buses get connected.
You mean you add devices through sysfs? That's another approach I was thinking I'd follow, except it still doesn't solve my problem... meaning I have no reliable way of telling the numbers assigned to the busses added.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-0(=>...i2c-9) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-1(=>...i2c-10) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-2(=>...i2c-11) devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0070/chan-4(=>...i2c-5)/5-0071/chan-3(=>...i2c-12)
Introducing links to sub-buses, named with respective channel id sounds good for me. Beside that your link example does not reflect your ASCII graphics of course ;-)
*COUGH...COUGH* Oh, that was on purpose... *COUGH...COUGH* so to see whether anyone was paying attention. Good catch! :-)
Thanks!
Gerlando
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Am 18.02.2013 11:38, schrieb Gerlando Falauto:
Quoted 6 lines
Hi Michael,
first of all thanks for your answer :-)
On 02/18/2013 11:19 AM, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
On my project I do no automatic i2c detection, but all is controlled via user space. So I always know where and which devices and buses get connected.
You mean you add devices through sysfs? That's another approach I was thinking I'd follow, except it still doesn't solve my problem... meaning I have no reliable way of telling the numbers assigned to the busses added.
Under the assumption that bus numbers increase (which might not be true in some special cases that do not hit me), you simply compare existing buses before and after add.
This will be no more necessary if your patch works as intended. Due to other work load I will not be able to test in the next weeks :-(
Signature · 2 lines
KR Michael