EAPOL bridging
Subsystems (3)
Hello,
I have some trouble bridging EAPOL frames. I'd like to do this to allow wired 802.1x authentication from within a kvm virtual machine. I have the following setup:
kvm -- tap0 -- br0 -- eth1 -- 802.1x authenticator (switch) -- more network
and it doesn't work. I've added a few logging rules to ebtables. I only see an EAPOL frame going through the INPUT chain of tap0. It seems to be dropped by the bridge. The EAPOL frame is an ethernet link local multicast frame with destination address 01-80-C2-00-00-03, "IEEE Std 802.1X PAE address".
I've looked at http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/groupmac/tutorial.html, which says that frames with a destination in the range 01-80-C2-00-00-00 to 01-80-C2-00-00-0F should not be forwarded by standard conformant bridges. I've also looked at net/bridge/br_input.c and br_handle_frame() seems quite intent on "bending" the standard when STP is disabled, but only for 01-80-C2-00-00-00. However there are more applications that use similar addresses, EAPOL included: http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/groupmac/Standard_Group_MAC_Address_assignments.pdf
Given the current state of affairs, would it be acceptable to make the code more permissive by forwarding all the range of reserved group addresses when STP is disabled? If not, what would be the way to go about enabling 802.1x authentication from within a virtual machine?
BTW, it seems this issue has been raised before, https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2007-November/005629.html
with the conclusion that
Quoted 2 lines
Despite what the standards say, many users are using bridging code for invisible firewalls etc, and in those cases they want STP and EAPOL frames to be forwarded.
Thanks,
-Ben
Quoted 23 lines · On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:06:28 -0400 Benjamin Poirier…
Hello,
I have some trouble bridging EAPOL frames. I'd like to do this to allow wired 802.1x authentication from within a kvm virtual machine. I have the following setup:
kvm -- tap0 -- br0 -- eth1 -- 802.1x authenticator (switch) -- more network
and it doesn't work. I've added a few logging rules to ebtables. I only see an EAPOL frame going through the INPUT chain of tap0. It seems to be dropped by the bridge. The EAPOL frame is an ethernet link local multicast frame with destination address 01-80-C2-00-00-03, "IEEE Std 802.1X PAE address".
I've looked at http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/groupmac/tutorial.html,
which says that frames with a destination in the range 01-80-C2-00-00-00 to 01-80-C2-00-00-0F should not be forwarded by standard conformant bridges. I've also looked atnet/bridge/br_input.candbr_handle_frame()seems quite intent on "bending" the standard when STP is disabled, but only for 01-80-C2-00-00-00. However there are more applications that use similar addresses, EAPOL included:
http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/groupmac/Standard_Group_MAC_Address_assignments.pdf
Quoted 10 lines
Given the current state of affairs, would it be acceptable to make the code more permissive by forwarding all the range of reserved group addresses when STP is disabled? If not, what would be the way to go about enabling 802.1x authentication from within a virtual machine?
BTW, it seems this issue has been raised before,
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2007-November/005629.html
with the conclusion thatQuoted 2 lines
Despite what the standards say, many users are using bridging code for invisible firewalls etc, and in those cases they want STP and EAPOL frames to be forwarded.
I would just take off the last byte (dest check).
PATCH 1/1 bridge: Forward reserved group addresses if !STP
Make all frames sent to reserved group MAC addresses (01:80:c2:00:00:00 to 01:80:c2:00:00:0f) be forwarded if STP is disabled. This enables forwarding EAPOL frames, among other things.
--- net/bridge/br_input.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
net/bridge/br_input.c +1 -1
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff *skb) goto drop;/* If STP is turned off, then forward */ -if (p->br->stp_enabled ==BR_NO_STP && dest[5 ] ==0 ) +if (p->br->stp_enabled ==BR_NO_STP ) goto forward; if (NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, skb, skb->dev,
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Re: [PATCH] bridge: Forward reserved group addresses if !STP
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:09:35 -0400 Benjamin Poirier…
Make all frames sent to reserved group MAC addresses (01:80:c2:00:00:00 to 01:80:c2:00:00:0f) be forwarded if STP is disabled. This enables forwarding EAPOL frames, among other things.
Signed-off-by Benjamin Poirier <[email protected]>
Re: [PATCH] bridge: Forward reserved group addresses if !STP
From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:28:58 -0700
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:09:35 -0400 Benjamin Poirier…
Make all frames sent to reserved group MAC addresses (01:80:c2:00:00:00 to 01:80:c2:00:00:0f) be forwarded if STP is disabled. This enables forwarding EAPOL frames, among other things.
Signed-off-by Benjamin Poirier <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.