NFSD Secinfo no name
Subsystems (2)
Hi Bruce,
On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me.
- Bryan
Quoted 3 lines · Bryan Schumaker
Hi Bruce,
On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me.
My real question was whether the bug you reported here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=130192462122087&w=2
appears to have been fixed (in my for-2.6.40 branch) to your satisfaction?
--b.
Quoted 11 lines · J. Bruce Fields
Quoted 3 lines · Bryan Schumaker
Hi Bruce,
On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me.
My real question was whether the bug you reported here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=130192462122087&w=2appears to have been fixed (in my for-2.6.40 branch) to your satisfaction?
Yes it has. That's what I was trying to answer, sorry if I wasn't clear.
Quoted 2 lines
--b.
Quoted 6 lines · Bryan Schumaker
Quoted 5 lines · J. Bruce Fields
Quoted 3 lines · Bryan Schumaker
Hi Bruce,
On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
My real question was whether the bug you reported here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=130192462122087&w=2appears to have been fixed (in my for-2.6.40 branch) to your satisfaction?
Yes it has. That's what I was trying to answer, sorry if I wasn't clear.
Oh, sorry, I misundertood then. Got it, thanks!
--b.