Skip to contentSkip to conversation

In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf

DISCUSSION Jeremy Puhlman 1 participant 1 message May 26, 2011

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I was working with some layerinfo code, and I noticed that the value of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf
in the meta-intel repo are kind of all over the map:

for each in */conf/layer.conf; do cat $each; done | grep BBFILE_COLLECTIONS
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_crownbay += "crownbay" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_crownbay-noemgd += "crownbay-noemgd" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_fishriver += "fishriver" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_jasperforest += "jasperforest" BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_sugarbay += "sugarbay"

For the above layers when I just list out oe-core and one of the above, the results from BBFILE_COLLECTIONS ends up
just being what ever was set above.

BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "n450"
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "emenlow"

When using these layers, the final BBFILE_COLLECTIONS is the list of all the layers as expected.

Was just curious if there was a intentional reason why the difference(i.e. is there some code that I am missing that fixes this up)?

Signature · 2 lines
Jeremy Puhlman
Montavista Sofware, LLC.