Skip to contentSkip to conversation

CRC endianess problem on DGE-510T

PATCH Daniel Hellstrom 2 participants 3 messages Jun 10, 2011

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello,

I'm having problems with the PCI network board D-LINK DGE-510T on SPARC32/LEON. The CRC calculated by ether_crc_le() does not match the CRC, however after swapping the result it matches. This is the same behaviour with the 3 boards I have. After applying the patch below everything works.

Does anyone know if this is a correct patch or has had similar problems on big endian machines?

Daniel

From: Daniel Hellstrom <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0200
[PATCH] dl2k: EEPROM CRC calculation wrong endianess on bigendian machine

---
drivers/net/dl2k.c | 2 +-

1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/net/dl2k.c +1 -1
index c445457..4bbbd7b 100644
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ parse_eeprom (struct net_device *dev)
       if (np->pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_DLINK) {  /* D-Link Only */
               /* Check CRC */
               crc = ~ether_crc_le (256 - 4, sromdata);
-               if (psrom->crc != crc) {
+               if (psrom->crc != cpu_to_le32(crc)) {q
                       printk (KERN_ERR "%s: EEPROM data CRC error.\n",
                                       dev->name);
                       return -1;

--
1.5.4

#1 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Daniel Hellstrom

Hello,

I'm having problems with the PCI network board D-LINK DGE-510T on SPARC32/LEON. The CRC calculated by ether_crc_le() does not match the CRC, however after swapping the result it matches. This is the same behaviour with the 3 boards I have. After applying the patch below everything works.

Does anyone know if this is a correct patch or has had similar problems on big endian machines?

No idea about this hardware, but it looks reasonable - the contents of the EEPROM are treated as being in little-endian order, except when reading the CRC for comparison.

Quoted 19 lines

Daniel

From: Daniel Hellstrom <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0200
[PATCH] dl2k: EEPROM CRC calculation wrong endianess on bigendian machine

---
 drivers/net/dl2k.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/net/dl2k.c +0 -0
index c445457..4bbbd7b 100644

drivers/net/dl2k.c parse_eeprom (struct net_device *dev) · line 349

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/dl2k.c +1 -1
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ parse_eeprom (struct net_device *dev)
        if (np->pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_DLINK) {  /* D-Link Only */
                /* Check CRC */
                crc = ~ether_crc_le (256 - 4, sromdata);
-               if (psrom->crc != crc) {
+               if (psrom->crc != cpu_to_le32(crc)) {q

q?

Ben.

Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/dl2k.c +0 -1
                        printk (KERN_ERR "%s: EEPROM data CRC error.\n",
                                        dev->name);
                        return -1;
--

1.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Signature · 3 lines
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
#2 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Ben Hutchings
Quoted 4 lines · Daniel Hellstrom

Hello,

I'm having problems with the PCI network board D-LINK DGE-510T on SPARC32/LEON. The CRC calculated by ether_crc_le() does not match the CRC, however after swapping the result it matches. This is the same behaviour with the 3 boards I have. After applying the patch below everything works.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Does anyone know if this is a correct patch or has had similar problems on big endian machines?

No idea about this hardware, but it looks reasonable - the contents of the EEPROM are treated as being in little-endian order, except when reading the CRC for comparison.

Ok, then I will submit my patch to the list.

The funny thing is that other vendors than DLINK doesn't check the CRC, they might have tested it on a big endian machine... but it might just be a coincidence.

Thanks,
Daniel

Quoted 49 lines
Quoted 21 lines

Daniel

From: Daniel Hellstrom <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0200
[PATCH] dl2k: EEPROM CRC calculation wrong endianess on bigendian machine

---
drivers/net/dl2k.c | 2 +-

1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/net/dl2k.c +0 -0
index c445457..4bbbd7b 100644

drivers/net/dl2k.c parse_eeprom (struct net_device *dev) · line 351

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/net/dl2k.c +1 -1
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ parse_eeprom (struct net_device *dev)
       if (np->pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_DLINK) {  /* D-Link Only */
               /* Check CRC */
               crc = ~ether_crc_le (256 - 4, sromdata);
-               if (psrom->crc != crc) {
+               if (psrom->crc != cpu_to_le32(crc)) {q
 
 

q?

Ben.

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/dl2k.c +0 -0
                       printk (KERN_ERR "%s: EEPROM data CRC error.\n",
                                       dev->name);
                       return -1;

--
1.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html