openssl 1.0?
Hello,
I wanted to get some feedback from the community about OpenSSL 1.0. We currently only support 0.9.8 in oe-core. Specifically: should we add openssl 1.0 to oe-core, and should the rest of our recipes build against it by default?
I imagine if we add 1.0 we'll still want to keep the 0.9.8 around for some time.
Thoughts?
Scott
Signature · 3 lines
Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center
Op 9 nov. 2011, om 03:02 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven:
Quoted 3 lines
Hello,
I wanted to get some feedback from the community about OpenSSL 1.0. We currently only support 0.9.8 in oe-core. Specifically: should we add openssl 1.0 to oe-core, and should the rest of our recipes build against it by default?
The openssl in meta-oe is working fine, just keep in mind that the SOVERSION changed, so you need a PR bump for everything that links against openssl when switching.
regards,
Koen
Quoted 8 lines · Koen Kooi
Op 9 nov. 2011, om 03:02 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven:
Quoted 3 lines
Hello,
I wanted to get some feedback from the community about OpenSSL 1.0. We currently only support 0.9.8 in oe-core. Specifically: should we add openssl 1.0 to oe-core, and should the rest of our recipes build against it by default?
The openssl in meta-oe is working fine, just keep in mind that the SOVERSION changed, so you need a PR bump for everything that links against openssl when switching.
FWIW I've list of packages to rebuild and manual fix for git-native needed after openssl upgrade.
http://wiki.shr-project.org/trac/wiki/Building%20SHR#Cannotparserecipesordo_rootfsafteropensslupgrade
Regards,
Signature · 1 line
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
Quoted 3 lines · On Wednesday 09 November 2011 10:28:21 Koen Kooi wrote:
The openssl in meta-oe is working fine, just keep in mind that the SOVERSION changed, so you need a PR bump for everything that links against openssl when switching.
Last I checked it still needed the fix we have in OE-core to work with SELinux enabled for the -native case. (I know, I know, send patches...)
Cheers,
Paul
Signature · 2 lines
Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Quoted 9 lines · Koen Kooi
Op 9 nov. 2011, om 03:02 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven:
Quoted 3 lines
Hello,
I wanted to get some feedback from the community about OpenSSL 1.0. We currently only support 0.9.8 in oe-core. Specifically: should we add openssl 1.0 to oe-core, and should the rest of our recipes build against it by default?
The openssl in meta-oe is working fine, just keep in mind that the SOVERSION changed, so you need a PR bump for everything that links against openssl when switching.
About 2 months have gone by with OE-core containing OpenSSL 1.0, can we deprecate the 0.9.8 version at this point?
If people still need 0.9.8, we can move it to meta-oe.
I will submit an RFC Patch later today to remove 0.9.8 from OE-core.
Sau!
Quoted 10 lines
regards,
Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core