Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Powerpc continued support?

DISCUSSION Chris Jones 4 participants 5 messages Jun 5, 2012

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I am just thinking about Powerpc support in the kernel. Are there any plans to remove its support? And if so, how much space would be saved by its removal or at least disablement of Powerpc specific modules?

Is it worth looking into this for a custom kernel?

Regards

Chris Jones

Signature · 7 lines
OpenSUSE Linux x86_64 (PC) | Android (Smartphone) | Windows x86
(Gaming!)
Kernel developer | Lead Developer of SDL | Lead Developer of Nest Linux | Gamer and Emulator nut | Web Services
| Digital Imaging Services
Controllers: Logitech Precision | PS3 controller | XB360 controller | Logitech
Attack 3 j/stick
Emulators: Fusion | Gens | ZSNES | Project64 | PCSX-R | Stella | WinVICE | WinUAE
#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Chris Jones

I am just thinking about Powerpc support in the kernel. Are there any plans to remove its support? And if so, how much space would be saved by its removal or at least disablement of Powerpc specific modules?

No plans to remove it at all. It's one of the more active architecture ports Linux has. Why on earth would it be removed?

Quoted 1 line

Is it worth looking into this for a custom kernel?

Sure... whatever floats your boat I guess.

josh

#2 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Josh Boyer
Quoted 3 lines · Chris Jones

I am just thinking about Powerpc support in the kernel. Are there any plans to remove its support? And if so, how much space would be saved by its removal or at least disablement of Powerpc specific modules?

No plans to remove it at all. It's one of the more active architecture ports Linux has. Why on earth would it be removed?

Sure, fair enough. I had no idea it was still so popular. But I can understand that if there's continued use, then there would be obvious reasons for continued support of the arch.

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Is it worth looking into this for a custom kernel?

Sure... whatever floats your boat I guess.

Something I might look into for custom kernel I suppose.

Regards

Chris Jones

#3 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Chris Jones

Sure, fair enough. I had no idea it was still so popular. But I can understand that if there's continued use, then there would be obvious reasons for continued support of the arch.

PPC is heavily used in embedded devices.

Signature · 2 lines
Thanks,
//richard
#4 lore raw
In reply to Chris Jones
Quoted 4 lines · Chris Jones
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line

Is it worth looking into this for a custom kernel?

Sure... whatever floats your boat I guess.

Something I might look into for custom kernel I suppose.

You do realize that ppc-only modules are not going to be built on e.g. x86, don't you? Not to mention the arch/powerpc stuff...