mm/slab_common.c:196:6: sparse: symbol 'print_slabinf
Quoted 2 lines · Fengguang Wu
Hi Glauber,
Fenghuang,
Quoted 7 lines
FYI, there are new sparse warnings show up in
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glommer/memcg.git slab-common/slabinfo head: 0521160acc51bc8385807752e69dd38d976aef22 commit: 162166afaaa413f42fc655f3a87140b9a08c0a6e [18/21] move print_slabinfo_header to slab_common.c+
mm/slab_common.c:196:6: sparse: symbol 'print_slabinfo_header' was not declared. Should it be static?
I fixed that.
Quoted 8 lines
--
+mm/slub.c:1713:6: sparse: symbol 'init_kmem_cache_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
+mm/slub.c:1938:5: sparse: symbol 'put_cpu_partial' was not declared. Should it be static?
+mm/slub.c:1068:40: sparse: context imbalance in 'free_debug_processing' - different lock contexts for basic block
+mm/slub.c:1856:28: sparse: context imbalance in 'deactivate_slab' - unexpected unlock
+mm/slub.c:1885:44: sparse: context imbalance in 'unfreeze_partials' - unexpected unlock
+mm/slub.c:2539:31: sparse: context imbalance in '__slab_free' - unexpected unlock
My patch does not touch those functions at all. (I checked in git blame, and they are in the tree for a while now).
If you want to send a patch fixing this upstream, you can add my Acked-by
(I could do that too, but you deserve the credit!)
Quoted 9 lines · Glauber Costa
Quoted 2 lines · Fengguang Wu
Hi Glauber,
Fenghuang,
Quoted 2 lines
FYI, there are new sparse warnings show up in
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glommer/memcg.git slab-common/slabinfo head: 0521160acc51bc8385807752e69dd38d976aef22 commit: 162166afaaa413f42fc655f3a87140b9a08c0a6e [18/21] move print_slabinfo_header to slab_common.c+
mm/slab_common.c:196:6: sparse: symbol 'print_slabinfo_header' was not declared. Should it be static?I fixed that.
Thanks!
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
--
+mm/slub.c:1713:6: sparse: symbol 'init_kmem_cache_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
+mm/slub.c:1938:5: sparse: symbol 'put_cpu_partial' was not declared. Should it be static?
+mm/slub.c:1068:40: sparse: context imbalance in 'free_debug_processing' - different lock contexts for basic block
+mm/slub.c:1856:28: sparse: context imbalance in 'deactivate_slab' - unexpected unlock
+mm/slub.c:1885:44: sparse: context imbalance in 'unfreeze_partials' - unexpected unlock
+mm/slub.c:2539:31: sparse: context imbalance in '__slab_free' - unexpected unlock
Quoted 6 lines
My patch does not touch those functions at all. (I checked in git blame, and they are in the tree for a while now).
If you want to send a patch fixing this upstream, you can add my Acked-by
(I could do that too, but you deserve the credit!)
OK, I'll send a standalone patch for making the functions static.
Thanks,
Fengguang