TX53: Not Bootable from next tree
Hi,
I've just flashed barebox from the next tree onto a TX53-8030 module, and have to report, that the board won't boot.
Currently I've tried to run it with MMU off and setting the text-base to 0x71000000, with no positive results.
I'll do further investigation, but meanwhile does anyone have barebox running on a TX53 board?
Cheers,
Christian
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Quoted 10 lines · Christian Kapeller
Hi,
I've just flashed barebox from the next tree onto a TX53-8030 module, and have to report, that the board won't boot.
Currently I've tried to run it with MMU off and setting the text-base to
0x71000000, with no positive results.I'll do further investigation, but meanwhile does anyone have barebox running on a TX53 board?
I just tested that it works for me as second stage. I can't test 1st stage atm as I currently have no physical access to the board.
Some guesses: Have you checked the correct the correct board revision in the config? It's the default, so I assume it's correct.
Are you using the barebox-flash-image link or barebox.bin? You have to use the former because it's a compressed image.
You might want to disable compressed image support in
General settings ->
memory layout ->
[ ] pre-bootoloader image
And see if that works.
Sascha
Signature · 9 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I've just flashed barebox from the next tree onto a TX53-8030 module, and have to report, that the board won't boot.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Currently I've tried to run it with MMU off and setting the text-base to
0x71000000, with no positive results.I'll do further investigation, but meanwhile does anyone have barebox running on a TX53 board?
I just tested that it works for me as second stage. I can't test 1st stage atm as I currently have no physical access to the board.
Until now I've used bb in a 2nd stage configuration on top of the supplied Redboot, and it worked without any problem.
Additionally I had CONFIG_MACH_DO_LOW_LEVEL_INIT disabled which skips another pll setup step, that was already done by Redboot.
Quoted 2 lines
Some guesses: Have you checked the correct the correct board revision in the config? It's the default, so I assume it's correct.
Yes, I did check for the correct board revision, and am using the correct one: CONFIG_TX53_REV_XX30=y
Quoted 2 lines
Are you using the barebox-flash-image link or barebox.bin? You have to use the former because it's a compressed image.
I've noticed, that the link target changes depending on build configuration. So I've flashed the file pointed to by barebox-flash-image.
Quoted 4 lines
You might want to disable compressed image support in
General settings ->
memory layout ->
[ ] pre-bootoloader image
Just tried that, but without changed result.
Currently I am trying to get my PEEDI JTAG probe working with the board, but until then I stay in the dark.
Cheers,
Christian
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox