rbd: no need for file mapping calculation
Subsystems (2)
cover rbd: no need for file mapping calculation
Currently every osd request submitted by the rbd code undergoes a file mapping operation, which is common with what the ceph file system uses. But some analysis shows that there is no need to do this for rbd, because it already takes care of its own blocking of image data into distinct objects. Removing this simplifies things. I especially think removing this improves things conceptually, removing a complex mapping operation from the I/O path.
-Alex
[PATCH REPOST 1/3] rbd: pull in ceph_calc_raw_layout() [PATCH REPOST 2/3] rbd: open code rbd_calc_raw_layout() [PATCH REPOST 3/3] rbd: don't bother calculating file mapping
PATCH 1/3 rbd: pull in ceph_calc_raw_layout()
This is the first in a series of patches aimed at eliminating the use of ceph_calc_raw_layout() by rbd.
It simply pulls in a copy of that function and renames it rbd_calc_raw_layout().
--- drivers/block/rbd.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/block/rbd.c +0 -0
@@ -1101,6 +1101,40 @@ static void rbd_layout_init(struct
ceph_file_layout *layout, u64 pool_id)
layout->fl_pg_pool = cpu_to_le32((u32) pool_id);
}
+int rbd_calc_raw_layout(struct ceph_file_layout *layout,
+ u64 off, u64 *plen, u64 *bno,
+ struct ceph_osd_request *req,
+ struct ceph_osd_req_op *op)
+{
+ u64 orig_len = *plen;
+ u64 objoff, objlen; /* extent in object */
+ int r;
+
+ /* object extent? */
+ r = ceph_calc_file_object_mapping(layout, off, orig_len, bno,
+ &objoff, &objlen);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return r;
+ if (objlen < orig_len) {
+ *plen = objlen;
+ dout(" skipping last %llu, final file extent %llu~%llu\n",
+ orig_len - *plen, off, *plen);
+ }
+
+ if (op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_READ || op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE) {
+ op->extent.offset = objoff;
+ op->extent.length = objlen;
+ }
+ req->r_num_pages = calc_pages_for(off, *plen);
+ req->r_page_alignment = off & ~PAGE_MASK;
+ if (op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE)
+ op->payload_len = *plen;
+
+ dout("calc_layout bno=%llx %llu~%llu (%d pages)\n",
+ *bno, objoff, objlen, req->r_num_pages);
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Send ceph osd request
*/
@@ -1167,7 +1201,7 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
osd_req->r_oid_len = strlen(osd_req->r_oid);
rbd_layout_init(&osd_req->r_file_layout, rbd_dev->spec->pool_id);
- ret = ceph_calc_raw_layout(&osd_req->r_file_layout,
+ ret = rbd_calc_raw_layout(&osd_req->r_file_layout,
ofs, &len, &bno, osd_req, op);
rbd_assert(ret == 0);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 2/3 rbd: open code rbd_calc_raw_layout()
In reply to Alex ElderThis patch gets rid of rbd_calc_raw_layout() by simply open coding it in its one caller.
--- drivers/block/rbd.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
drivers/block/rbd.c +0 -0
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static struct ceph_osd_req_op
*rbd_create_rw_op(int opcode, u32 payload_len)
return NULL;
/*
* op extent offset and length will be set later on
- * in calc_raw_layout()
+ * after ceph_calc_file_object_mapping().
*/
op->op = opcode;
op->payload_len = payload_len;
@@ -1101,40 +1101,6 @@ static void rbd_layout_init(struct ceph_file_layout *layout, u64 pool_id)
layout->fl_pg_pool = cpu_to_le32((u32) pool_id);
}
-int rbd_calc_raw_layout(struct ceph_file_layout *layout,
- u64 off, u64 *plen, u64 *bno,
- struct ceph_osd_request *req,
- struct ceph_osd_req_op *op)
-{
- u64 orig_len = *plen;
- u64 objoff, objlen; /* extent in object */
- int r;
-
- /* object extent? */
- r = ceph_calc_file_object_mapping(layout, off, orig_len, bno,
- &objoff, &objlen);
- if (r < 0)
- return r;
- if (objlen < orig_len) {
- *plen = objlen;
- dout(" skipping last %llu, final file extent %llu~%llu\n",
- orig_len - *plen, off, *plen);
- }
-
- if (op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_READ || op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE) {
- op->extent.offset = objoff;
- op->extent.length = objlen;
- }
- req->r_num_pages = calc_pages_for(off, *plen);
- req->r_page_alignment = off & ~PAGE_MASK;
- if (op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE)
- op->payload_len = *plen;
-
- dout("calc_layout bno=%llx %llu~%llu (%d pages)\n",
- *bno, objoff, objlen, req->r_num_pages);
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* Send ceph osd request
*/
@@ -1158,6 +1124,8 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
struct ceph_osd_request *osd_req;
int ret;
u64 bno;
+ u64 obj_off = 0;
+ u64 obj_len = 0;
struct timespec mtime = CURRENT_TIME;
struct rbd_request *rbd_req;
struct ceph_osd_client *osdc;
@@ -1201,9 +1169,22 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
osd_req->r_oid_len = strlen(osd_req->r_oid);
rbd_layout_init(&osd_req->r_file_layout, rbd_dev->spec->pool_id);
- ret = rbd_calc_raw_layout(&osd_req->r_file_layout,
- ofs, &len, &bno, osd_req, op);
+ ret = ceph_calc_file_object_mapping(&osd_req->r_file_layout, ofs, len,
+ &bno, &obj_off, &obj_len);
rbd_assert(ret == 0);
+ if (obj_len < len) {
+ dout(" skipping last %llu, final file extent %llu~%llu\n",
+ len - obj_len, ofs, obj_len);
+ len = obj_len;
+ }
+ if (op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_READ || op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE) {
+ op->extent.offset = obj_off;
+ op->extent.length = obj_len;
+ if (op->op == CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE)
+ op->payload_len = obj_len;
+ }
+ osd_req->r_num_pages = calc_pages_for(ofs, len);
+ osd_req->r_page_alignment = ofs & ~PAGE_MASK;
ceph_osdc_build_request(osd_req, ofs, len, 1, op,
snapc, snapid, &mtime);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 3/3 rbd: don't bother calculating file mapping
In reply to Alex ElderWhen rbd_do_request() has a request to process it initializes a ceph file layout structure and uses it to compute offsets and limits for the range of the request using ceph_calc_file_object_mapping().
The layout used is fixed, and is based on RBD_MAX_OBJ_ORDER (30). It sets the layout's object size and stripe unit to be 1 GB (2^30), and sets the stripe count to be 1.
The job of ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() is to determine which of a sequence of objects will contain data covered by range, and within that object, at what offset the range starts. It also truncates the length of the range at the end of the selected object if necessary.
This is needed for ceph fs, but for rbd it really serves no purpose. It does its own blocking of images into objects, echo of which is (1 << obj_order) in size, and as a result it ignores the "bno" value returned by ceph_calc_file_object_mapping(). In addition, by the point a request has reached this function, it is already destined for a single rbd object, and its length will not exceed that object's extent. Because of this, and because the mapping will result in blocking up the range using an integer multiple of the image's object order, ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() will never change the offset or length values defined by the request.
In other words, this call is a big no-op for rbd data requests.
There is one exception. We read the header object using this function, and in that case we will not have already limited the request size. However, the header is a single object (not a file or rbd image), and should not be broken into pieces anyway. So in fact we should *not* be calling ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() when operating on the header object.
So...
Don't call ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() in rbd_do_request(), because useless for image data and incorrect to do sofor the image header.
--- drivers/block/rbd.c | 18 ++++-------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
drivers/block/rbd.c +4 -14
@@ -1123,9 +1123,6 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq, {struct ceph_osd_request *osd_req;int ret; -u64 bno; -u64 obj_off =0 ; -u64 obj_len =0 ;struct timespec mtime =CURRENT_TIME ;struct rbd_request *rbd_req;struct ceph_osd_client *osdc;
@@ -1169,19 +1166,12 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq, osd_req->r_oid_len =strlen (osd_req->r_oid);rbd_layout_init (&osd_req->r_file_layout, rbd_dev->spec->pool_id); - ret =ceph_calc_file_object_mapping (&osd_req->r_file_layout, ofs, len, - &bno, &obj_off, &obj_len); -rbd_assert (ret ==0 ); -if (obj_len < len) { -dout (" skipping last %llu, final file extent %llu~%llu\n" , - len - obj_len, ofs, obj_len); - len = obj_len; - } +if (op->op ==CEPH_OSD_OP_READ || op->op ==CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE ) { - op->extent.offset = obj_off; - op->extent.length = obj_len; + op->extent.offset = ofs; + op->extent.length = len;if (op->op ==CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE ) - op->payload_len = obj_len; + op->payload_len = len; } osd_req->r_num_pages =calc_pages_for (ofs, len); osd_req->r_page_alignment = ofs & ~PAGE_MASK ;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Quoted 8 lines · Alex Elder
Currently every osd request submitted by the rbd code undergoes a file mapping operation, which is common with what the ceph file system uses. But some analysis shows that there is no need to do this for rbd, because it already takes care of its own blocking of image data into distinct objects. Removing this simplifies things. I especially think removing this improves things conceptually, removing a complex mapping operation from the I/O path.
Quoted 5 lines
-Alex
[PATCH REPOST 1/3] rbd: pull in
ceph_calc_raw_layout()[PATCH REPOST 2/3] rbd: open coderbd_calc_raw_layout()[PATCH REPOST 3/3] rbd: don't bother calculating file mapping
We'll want to use similar methods later for fancier rbd striping with format 2 images, but that'll take more restructuring later anyway. This is fine for now.