firewire net: IPv6 support (RFC3146).
Subsystems (3)
RFC PATCH 5/6 firewire net: IPv6 support (RFC3146).
Send packets for IPv6 multicast via GASP.
--- drivers/firewire/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ drivers/firewire/net.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/firewire/Kconfig +8 -0
@@ -51,9 +51,17 @@ config FIREWIRE_NET other implementations of RFC 2734 as found on several operating systems. Multicast support is currently limited. + Optional IPv6 support is available if you say Y here. + To compile this driver as a module, say M here: The module will be called firewire-net. +config FIREWIRE_NET_IPV6 + bool "IPv6 networking over 1394" + depends on FIREWIRE_NET=y + help + This enabless IPv6 over IEEE 1394, based on RFC 3146. + config FIREWIRE_NOSY tristate "Nosy - a FireWire traffic sniffer for PCILynx cards" depends on PCI
drivers/firewire/net.c +10 -3
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@#include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <asm/unaligned.h> +#include <linux/ipv6.h> +#include <net/addrconf.h> #include <net/arp.h> #include <net/firewire.h>
@@ -1329,13 +1331,18 @@ static netdev_tx_t fwnet_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *net) dg_size = skb->len;/* -* Set the transmission type for the packet. ARP packets and IP -* broadcast packets are sent via GASP. +* Set the transmission type for the packet. ARP packets, IPv4 +* broadcast packets, IPv6 multicast packets are sent via GASP. */ if (memcmp(hdr_buf.h_dest, net->broadcast, FWNET_ALEN) == 0 || proto == htons(ETH_P_ARP) || (proto == htons(ETH_P_IP) - &&IN_MULTICAST (ntohl (ip_hdr (skb)->daddr)))) { + && IN_MULTICAST(ntohl(ip_hdr(skb)->daddr))) +#if defined(CONFIG_FIREWIRE_NET_IPV6 ) + || (proto == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) + && ipv6_addr_is_multicast(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr)) +#endif + ) { max_payload = dev->broadcast_xmt_max_payload; datagram_label_ptr = &dev->broadcast_xmt_datagramlabel;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Quoted 15 lines · On Jan 12 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
Send packets for IPv6 multicast via GASP.
CC Stephan Gatzka <[email protected]>CC Stefan Richter <[email protected]>Signed-off-by YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[email protected]>--- drivers/firewire/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ drivers/firewire/net.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/firewire/Kconfig +0
-0
drivers/firewire/Kconfig config FIREWIRE_NET · line 55
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/firewire/Kconfig +2
-0@@ -51,9 +51,17 @@ config FIREWIRE_NET other implementations of RFC 2734 as found on several operating systems. Multicast support is currently limited. + Optional IPv6 support is available if you say Y here. +
This is a bit premature. At least one thing which is still missing (also missing in Stephan's patch from previous week) is the RFC 3146 clause 5 Configuration ROM entry.
drivers/firewire/Kconfig config FIREWIRE_NET · line 64
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/firewire/Kconfig +6
-0To compile this driver as a module, say M here: The module will be called firewire-net. +config FIREWIRE_NET_IPV6 + bool "IPv6 networking over 1394" + depends on FIREWIRE_NET=y + help + This enabless IPv6 over IEEE 1394, based on RFC 3146. +
I would rather like this to be like an invisible option which is automatically on if IPV6=y || (IPV6=m && FIREWIRE_NET=m), and off otherwise.
Or, as alluded to in my other post, it is going to be written such that
- if IPV6=n, FIREWIRE_NET can be n, y, or m. RFC 3146 support won't be built in in any case.
- If IPV6=y, FIREWIRE_NET can be n, y, or m. RFC 3146 support will be built in.
- If IPV6=m, FIREWIRE_NET can be only n or m. RFC 3146 support will be built in in the latter case.
Quoted 28 lines
drivers/firewire/Kconfig +0
-0config FIREWIRE_NOSY tristate "Nosy - a FireWire traffic sniffer for PCILynx cards" depends on PCIdrivers/firewire/net.c +4
-2@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@#include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <asm/unaligned.h> +#include <linux/ipv6.h> +#include <net/addrconf.h> #include <net/arp.h> #include <net/firewire.h> @@ -1329,13 +1331,18 @@ static netdev_tx_t fwnet_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *net) dg_size = skb->len;/* -* Set the transmission type for the packet. ARP packets and IP -* broadcast packets are sent via GASP. +* Set the transmission type for the packet. ARP packets, IPv4 +* broadcast packets, IPv6 multicast packets are sent via GASP. */ if (memcmp(hdr_buf.h_dest, net->broadcast, FWNET_ALEN) == 0 || proto == htons(ETH_P_ARP) || (proto == htons(ETH_P_IP)
drivers/firewire/net.c static netdev_tx_t fwnet_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *net) · line 1348
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/firewire/net.c +6
-1- && IN_MULTICAST(ntohl(ip_hdr(skb)->daddr)))) { + && IN_MULTICAST(ntohl(ip_hdr(skb)->daddr))) +#if defined(CONFIG_FIREWIRE_NET_IPV6 ) + || (proto == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) + && ipv6_addr_is_multicast(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr)) +#endif + ) { max_payload = dev->broadcast_xmt_max_payload; datagram_label_ptr = &dev->broadcast_xmt_datagramlabel;
This hunk is fine with me.
Signature · 3 lines
Stefan Richter -=====-===-= ---= -==-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
Quoted 4 lines
This is a bit premature. At least one thing which is still missing (also missing in Stephan's patch from previous week) is the RFC 3146 clause 5 Configuration ROM entry.
Argh, my fault. I already had it when I began to implement this stuff. It got lost somewhere...
No problem, I'll add it.
Quoted 3 lines · On Jan 12 Stefan Richter wrote:
At least one thing which is still missing (also
missing in Stephan's patch from previous week) is the RFC 3146 clause 5 Configuration ROM entry.
Another thing: As far as I understand, the current code assumes that peers will use the same unicast_FIFO for IPv4 unicast as for IPv6 unicast. This is not necessarily true. Either firewire-net needs to maintain two lists of peers (one for IPv4, another for IPv6), or it needs to maintain two unicast_FIFOs per peer.
Signature · 3 lines
Stefan Richter -=====-===-= ---= -==-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
Quoted 7 lines
Another thing: As far as I understand, the current code assumes that peers will use the same
unicast_FIFOfor IPv4 unicast as for IPv6 unicast. This is not necessarily true. Either firewire-net needs to maintain two lists of peers (one for IPv4, another for IPv6), or it needs to maintain twounicast_FIFOsper peer.
Thanks for pointing that out. I would go for two unicast_Fifos per peer.
Quoted 9 lines · On Jan 12 Stephan Gatzka wrote:
Quoted 7 lines
Another thing: As far as I understand, the current code assumes that peers will use the same
unicast_FIFOfor IPv4 unicast as for IPv6 unicast. This is not necessarily true. Either firewire-net needs to maintain two lists of peers (one for IPv4, another for IPv6), or it needs to maintain twounicast_FIFOsper peer.Thanks for pointing that out. I would go for two
unicast_Fifosper peer.
Indeed. Plus, if we look up an IPv6 peer whose IPv6 unicast_FIFO is as yet unkown but whose IPv4 unicast_FIFO is already known, we could optimistically use the latter until we learn the former. And vice versa.
Signature · 3 lines
Stefan Richter -=====-===-= ---= -==-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/