Btrfs: make raid attr array more readable
One small error (see below):
Quoted 118 lines
As the title said, this patch just make raid attr array more readable.
Cc Liu Bo <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Miao Xie <[email protected]>--- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 10 +++++++++- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 22 +++++++++------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)fs/btrfs/ctree.h +9
-1@@ -953,7 +953,15 @@ struct btrfs_dev_replace_item {#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP (1ULL << 5)#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 (1ULL << 6)#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RESERVED BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE -#define BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES 5 + +enum btrfs_raid_types { +BTRFS_RAID_RAID10 , +BTRFS_RAID_RAID1 , +BTRFS_RAID_DUP , +BTRFS_RAID_RAID0 , +BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE , +BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES +};#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA | \ BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM | \fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +9
-13@@ -5547,20 +5547,16 @@ wait_block_group_cache_done(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)int __get_raid_index (u64 flags) { -int index; -if (flags &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 ) - index =0 ; +return BTRFS_RAID_RAID10 ;else if (flags &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 ) - index =1 ; +return BTRFS_RAID_RAID1 ;else if (flags &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP ) - index =2 ; +return BTRFS_RAID_DUP ;else if (flags &BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 ) - index =3 ; +return BTRFS_RAID_RAID0 ;else - index =4 ; - -return index; +return BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE ; }static int get_block_group_index (struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)@@ -7520,16 +7516,16 @@ int btrfs_can_relocate(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr) index =get_block_group_index (block_group); } -if (index ==0 ) { +if (index ==BTRFS_RAID_RAID10 ) { dev_min =4 ;/* Divide by 2 */ min_free >>=1 ; - }else if (index ==1 ) { + }else if (index ==BTRFS_RAID_RAID1 ) { dev_min =2 ; - }else if (index ==2 ) { + }else if (index ==BTRFS_RAID_DUP ) {/* Multiply by 2 */ min_free <<=1 ; - }else if (index ==3 ) { + }else if (index ==BTRFS_RAID_RAID0 ) { dev_min = fs_devices->rw_devices;do_div (min_free, dev_min); }fs/btrfs/volumes.c +23
-5@@ -3492,13 +3492,48 @@ static int btrfs_cmp_device_info(const void *a, const void *b) }struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES ] = { - {2 ,1 ,0 ,4 ,2 ,2 /* raid10 */ }, - {1 ,1 ,2 ,2 ,2 ,2 /* raid1 */ }, - {1 ,2 ,1 ,1 ,1 ,2 /* dup */ }, - {1 ,1 ,0 ,2 ,1 ,1 /* raid0 */ }, - {1 ,1 ,1 ,1 ,1 ,1 /* single */ }, + [BTRFS_RAID_RAID10 ] = { + .sub_stripes =2 , + .dev_stripes =1 , + .devs_max =0 ,/* 0 == as many as possible */ + .devs_min =4 , + .devs_increment =2 , + .ncopies =2 , + }, + [BTRFS_RAID_RAID1 ] = { + .sub_stripes =1 , + .dev_stripes =1 , + .devs_max =2 , + .devs_min =2 , + .devs_increment =2 , + .ncopies =2 , + }, + [BTRFS_RAID_DUP ] = { + .sub_stripes =1 , + .dev_stripes =2 , + .devs_max =1 , + .devs_min =1 , + .devs_increment =1 , + .ncopies =2 ,
fs/btrfs/volumes.c static int btrfs_cmp_device_info(const void *a, const void *b) · line 3527
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +10
-0+ }, + [BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = { + .sub_stripes = 1, + .dev_stripes = 1, + .devs_max = 0, + .devs_min = 2, + .devs_increment = 1, + .ncopies = 1, + }, + [BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = {
Shouldn't this rather be BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE ?
Quoted 19 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +8
-1+ .sub_stripes = 1, + .dev_stripes = 1, + .devs_max = 1, + .devs_min = 1, + .devs_increment = 1, + .ncopies = 1, + }, }; - + static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *extent_root, struct map_lookup **map_ret,Signature · 5 lines
1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html