Documentation: filter-branch env-filter example
PATCH 1/1 Documentation: filter-branch env-filter example
filter-branch --env-filter example that shows how to change the email address in all commits by a certain developer.
--- Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt +13 -0
@@ -329,6 +329,19 @@ git filter-branch --msg-filter ' ' HEAD~10..HEAD -------------------------------------------------------- +You can modify committer/author personal information using `--env-filter`. +For example, to update some developer's email address use this command: + +-------------------------------------------------------- +git filter-branch --env-filter ' + if [ $GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL = [email protected] ] + then + [email protected] + fi + export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL +' -- --all +-------------------------------------------------------- + To restrict rewriting to only part of the history, specify a revision range in addition to the new branch name. The new branch name will point to the top-most revision that a 'git rev-list' of this range
Signature · 1 line
1.7.11.7
Quoted 3 lines · Tadeusz Andrzej Kadłubowski
filter-branch --env-filter example that shows how to change the email address in all commits by a certain developer.
---
Thanks. Sign-off?
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt +0
-0
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt git filter-branch --msg-filter ' · line 337
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt +6
-0@@ -329,6 +329,19 @@ git filter-branch --msg-filter ' ' HEAD~10..HEAD -------------------------------------------------------- +You can modify committer/author personal information using `--env-filter`. +For example, to update some developer's email address use this command: + +-------------------------------------------------------- +git filter-branch --env-filter ' + if [ $GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL = [email protected] ]
Quote the variable in double-quotes, like this:
if [ "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" = [email protected] ]
Otherwise the comparison will break, if the e-mail part had a whitespace in it, or if it were empty, which is an example of a more likely situation where you would want to fix commits using a procedure like this, no?
But more on the example later...
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt git filter-branch --msg-filter ' · line 344
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt +7
-0+ then + [email protected] + fi + export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL +' -- --all +-------------------------------------------------------- +
I do not think an illustration of env-filter is a bad addition per-se, but the sample scenario is not a realistic one. No sane project should be encouraged to rewrite their entire history every time one of the contributors change his e-mail address. That is what the mailmap mechanism is for.
The only scenario that justifies use of the given sample I can think of is to rewrite the author and committer in an unpublished project because you noticed that you forgot to set user.name and user.email up before you created these commits correctly.
Taking all of the above, the added text may look more like this, I think:
The --env-filter can be used to modify committer and/or author identity. For example, if you found out that your commits have wrong identity of yours due to misconfigured user.email, you can make correction, before publishing the project, like this:
--------------------------------------------------------
git filter-branch --env-filter '
if test "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" = "root@localhost" then
[email protected] export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL
fi
if test "$GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL" = "root@localhost" then
[email protected] export GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL
fi
' -- --all
--------------------------------------------------------
By the way, I left the "export" in; "git filter-branch --help" explicitly says that you need to re-export it. But I am not sure if they are necessary, especially after 3c730fab2cae (filter-branch:
use git-sh-setup's ident parsing functions, 2012-10-18) by Peff, which added extra "export" to make sure all six identity variables are exported. After applying the above rewrite, we may want to do the following as a separate, follow-up patch.
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt +1 -4
@@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ OPTIONS This filter may be used if you only need to modify the environment in which the commit will be performed. Specifically, you might want to rewrite the author/committer name/email/time environment - variables (see linkgit:git-commit-tree[1] for details). Do not forget - to re-export the variables. + variables (see linkgit:git-commit-tree[1] for details). --tree-filter <command>:: This is the filter for rewriting the tree and its contents.
@@ -340,12 +339,10 @@ git filter-branch --env-filter ' if test "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" = "root@localhost" then [email protected] - export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL fi if test "$GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL" = "root@localhost" then [email protected] - export GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL fi ' -- --all --------------------------------------------------------
Quoted 8 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quote the variable in double-quotes, like this:
if [ "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" = [email protected] ]
Otherwise the comparison will break, if the e-mail part had a whitespace in it, or if it were empty, which is an example of a more likely situation where you would want to fix commits using a procedure like this, no?
Yeah, definitely. If you are cleaning up a broken ident that cannot be parsed, the failure mode is to put the whole author line in $GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL, which would almost certainly include spaces.
Quoted 9 lines
Taking all of the above, the added text may look more like this, I think:
The
--env-filtercan be used to modify committer and/or author identity. For example, if you found out that your commits have wrong identity of yours due to misconfigured user.email, you can make correction, before publishing the project, like this:
Quoted 14 lines
--------------------------------------------------------
git filter-branch --env-filter '
if test "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" = "root@localhost" then
[email protected] exportGIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL
fi
if test "$GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL" = "root@localhost" then
[email protected] exportGIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL
fi
' -- --all
--------------------------------------------------------
That looks better, though there are a few English nits; here's my edited version:
The --env-filter option can be used to modify committer and/or author identity. For example, if you found out that your commits have the wrong identity due to a misconfigured user.email, you can make a correction, before publishing the project, like this:
Quoted 7 lines
By the way, I left the "export" in; "git filter-branch --help" explicitly says that you need to re-export it. But I am not sure if they are necessary, especially after
3c730fab2cae(filter-branch:
use git-sh-setup's ident parsing functions, 2012-10-18) by Peff, which added extra "export" to make sure all six identity variables are exported. After applying the above rewrite, we may want to do the following as a separate, follow-up patch.
I think it has always been the case that we export them after setting them; just look at the preimage from 3c730fab, and you can see exports there.
I think the advice in the documentation about re-exporting is because some versions of the bourne shell will not reliably pass the new version of the variable when you do this:
VAR=old
export VAR
VAR=new
some_subprocess ;# we see $VAR=old here!
I do not recall ever running across such a shell myself, but rather hearing about it third-hand in a portability guide somewhere. Apple's shell documentation seems to indicate that /bin/sh in older versions of OS X had this behavior:
which makes me think that BSD ash may behave that way. It is certainly not necessary to re-export under bash or dash. I shudder to think what horrible, 1980's-era behavior is codified in Solaris /bin/sh.
We could explicitly re-export all of the ident variables preemptively before calling commit-tree, just to save the user the hassle of remembering to do so. It would be a no-op on sane shells, and I doubt the runtime cost is very high. I suppose it would break somebody who explicitly did:
unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME ;# use the value from user.name
in their env-filter, but that seems like a pretty unlikely corner case.
-Peff
Quoted 11 lines · Jeff King
I think the advice in the documentation about re-exporting is because some versions of the bourne shell will not reliably pass the new version of the variable when you do this:
VAR=old
export VAR
VAR=new
some_subprocess;# we see $VAR=old here!I do not recall ever running across such a shell myself, but rather hearing about it third-hand in a portability guide somewhere.
The closest I could find in the autoconf shell guidelines[1] is that the automagic export marking for incoming variables is not always accurate:
export
The builtin export dubs a shell variable environment variable. Each update of exported variables corresponds to an update of the environment variables. Conversely, each environment variable received by the shell when it is launched should be imported as a shell variable marked as exported.
Alas, many shells, such as Solaris 2.5, IRIX 6.3, IRIX 5.2, AIX 4.1.5, and Digital UNIX 4.0, forget to export the environment variables they receive. As a result, two variables coexist: the environment variable and the shell variable. The following code demonstrates this failure:
#! /bin/sh
echo $FOO
FOO=bar
echo $FOO
exec /bin/sh $0
when run with FOO=foo' in the environment, these shells will print alternately foo' and bar', although it should only print foo' and then a sequence of `bar's.
Therefore you should export again each environment variable that you update.
I don't know what the behavior would be on such shells of:
#!/bin/sh echo $FOO FOO=bar export FOO echo $FOO exec /bin/sh $0
I.e., would the "export" correctly reconcile the local and environment copies of the variable, or are they forever broken? I don't have such a system to test on. But that would more closely match what we are doing.
-Peff
[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html#Limitations-of-Builtins
Quoted 3 lines · Jeff King
I think it has always been the case that we export them after setting them; just look at the preimage from
3c730fab, and you can see exports there.
Yeah, I think the only difference is a broken commit case where sed expression did not find what it was looking for, in which case we do not do the export.
Quoted 3 lines
I think the advice in the documentation about re-exporting is because some versions of the bourne shell will not reliably pass the new version of the variable ...
Ahh, old and painful memory of Solaris days comes back to me. OK, let's keep the export then.
Thanks.