RT5390 rev 0503 problems
Quoted 11 lines · wireless newbie
Has anyone experience with Ralink RT5390 chip with revision 0503? I have that chip on my wireless usb module (WPER-172gn). I'm able to use only one antenna with it but it has very poor rx signal level that way. Adding second antenna for testing purposes clearly improves rx level but that is no option for me.
I noticed in the list that someone had same sort of problem with rt5390 rev 1502. Problem was hardware antenna diversity that wasn't handled properly on the driver. Driver patch was provided to fix that. I applied those same changes for rev 0503 and that solved my rx level problem too.
is it like this ?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=134136097328697
Yes, that is exactly the same patch that I used. It does it's job fixing my signal levels with one antenna. I was just wondering if there could be something
else that is different with this revision, because the performance seems to be worse than with rt3070 on same environment.
2013/5/6 Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>:
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 11 lines · wireless newbie
Has anyone experience with Ralink RT5390 chip with revision 0503? I have that chip on my wireless usb module (WPER-172gn). I'm able to use only one antenna with it but it has very poor rx signal level that way. Adding second antenna for testing purposes clearly improves rx level but that is no option for me.
I noticed in the list that someone had same sort of problem with rt5390 rev 1502. Problem was hardware antenna diversity that wasn't handled properly on the driver. Driver patch was provided to fix that. I applied those same changes for rev 0503 and that solved my rx level problem too.
is it like this ?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=134136097328697