Skip to contentSkip to conversation

--no-degraded doesn't work

DISCUSSION Phillip Susi 1 participant 1 message Jun 5, 2013 MD RAID

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

It seems that --no-degraded and/or incremental assembly does not refuse to start a degraded array if one of the disks shows as being removed already, possibly by an explicit fail/remove at runtime, or manually starting the array without --no-degraded once.

Shouldn't --no-degraded refuse to start a degraded array even if the missing disk already has been removed from the disk table in the superblock?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRr1W1AAoJEJrBOlT6nu75E5QIAMA7FQ7gu8E1ZS2IJSiik7Ap 3JgEvt7vGlWEU8zexQHgmX7zbzIv1X7WaQfUNBdRfy8ZA2sUluv8LaiRqo4b4lSJ kP5/cYvDJo61PkyTDEFm6dG7V7zTiyVRwns+m2UrafMN0zy3O4Mm7ix+wrjitMsU IcRODfPvOoZ2wMcdlhSlK83vQcEG5gLKSOzCpVpai6a7m+HMDf9eTIm6iZbbjg1h Kbov0TNiHqa3zHUgaO60AxtclxQvytQpyrcqo6M4e/rRExNzuaRD3diIcMwJRClB uj+KTG9L/ek3YhC1m+1B+18Phi+VrRL74V4BUzIUDK2ta2uY9UZbbqmMTtPA9bg= =byYU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----