Skip to contentSkip to conversation

dmsetup arguments

DISCUSSION [email protected] 2 participants 4 messages Jun 14, 2013 – Jun 19, 2013 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author
#0 lore raw

Hi,

XFStests suite generic/311 test fails on command: "sbin/dmsetup load flakey-test --table "0 150000001 flakey /dev/sdc2 0 0 180 1 drop_writes" with error: "device-mapper: reload ioctl on flakey-test failed: Invalid argument", so as I understand the command format provided to ioctl is incorrect here. Kernel logs has message:

"Jun 13 16:47:15 tests kernel: device-mapper: table: 252:3: flakey: dm-flakey: Invalid argument count

Jun 13 16:47:15 tests kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table"

Looking into the source code of package LVM2.02.98 which devmapper library belongs to I find argument "drop_writes" used in the command only in documentation doc/kernel/flakey.txt:

"Optional feature parameters:
If no feature parameters are present, during the periods of unreliability, all I/O returns errors.

drop_writes:
All write I/O is silently ignored.
Read I/O is handled correctly."

This argument feature was added in the patch from "27 Jun 2011":

"[dm-devel] [PATCH 0/9] dm flakey: add features
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* /From/: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
* /To/: <dm-devel redhat com>
* /Cc/: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
* /Subject/: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/9] dm flakey: add features
* /Date/: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:53:34 -0400

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Add "drop_writes", "corrupt_bio_byte" and "debug" features to the flakey target."

https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-June/msg00081.html

but was patch modifications included in library of LVM2.02.98 package? Or may be it was already removed from it after?

Thanks,
Alexander Tsvetkov

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:51:25PM +0400, [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

XFStests suite generic/311 test fails on command: "sbin/dmsetup load flakey-test --table "0 150000001 flakey /dev/sdc2 0 0 180 1 drop_writes" with error: "device-mapper: reload ioctl on flakey-test
failed: Invalid argument", so as I understand the command format provided to ioctl is incorrect here. Kernel logs has message:

Quoted 4 lines

"Jun 13 16:47:15 tests kernel: device-mapper: table: 252:3: flakey:
dm-flakey: Invalid argument count

Jun 13 16:47:15 tests kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: error adding

target to table"

What kernel and version of dmsetup are you using? If it is too old to support the flakey target, then we need a new require rule check for the test to avoid old versions of dmsetup...

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 7 lines
Dave Chinner
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
#3 lore raw
In reply to a message not in the archive
Quoted 14 lines · On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:08:44PM +0400, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 13 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 12 lines · On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:51:25PM +0400, [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

XFStests suite generic/311 test fails on command: "sbin/dmsetup load flakey-test --table "0 150000001 flakey /dev/sdc2 0 0 180 1 drop_writes" with error: "device-mapper: reload ioctl on flakey-test
failed: Invalid argument", so as I understand the command format provided to ioctl is incorrect here. Kernel logs has message:

"Jun 13 16:47:15 tests kernel: device-mapper: table: 252:3: flakey:
dm-flakey: Invalid argument count

Jun 13 16:47:15 tests kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: error adding

target to table"

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

What kernel and version of dmsetup are you using? If it is too old to support the flakey target, then we need a new require rule check for the test to avoid old versions of dmsetup...

Kernel version is 2.6.39, version of device-mapper-libs is 1.02.77.

So it's an old version of both the kernel and DM, so it's probably not been tested at all. Like I said - it probably needs a better check in _require_dm_flakey() to determine if the test should be run or not.

Patches are welcome...

Cheers,

Dave.

PS: please reply-to-all for mailing list traffic, not by private email. I've re-added the XFS list to the CC list.

PPS: Top posting destroys the context of your reply - nobody has any idea of what part of the previous message you are responding to. Repsonding inline is much easier to follow with when conversions get long...

Signature · 7 lines
Dave Chinner
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
author
#4 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 14 lines · On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:08:44PM +0400, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 13 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 12 lines · On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:51:25PM +0400, [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

XFStests suite generic/311 test fails on command: "sbin/dmsetup load flakey-test --table "0 150000001 flakey /dev/sdc2 0 0 180 1 drop_writes" with error: "device-mapper: reload ioctl on flakey-test
failed: Invalid argument", so as I understand the command format provided to ioctl is incorrect here. Kernel logs has message:

"Jun 13 16:47:15 tests kernel: device-mapper: table: 252:3: flakey:
dm-flakey: Invalid argument count

Jun 13 16:47:15 tests kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: error adding

target to table"

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines

What kernel and version of dmsetup are you using? If it is too old to support the flakey target, then we need a new require rule check for the test to avoid old versions of dmsetup...

Kernel version is 2.6.39, version of device-mapper-libs is 1.02.77.

So it's an old version of both the kernel and DM, so it's probably not been tested at all. Like I said - it probably needs a better check in _require_dm_flakey() to determine if the test should be run or not.

I agree about kernel version, but why DM version of 1.02.77 is also old? I though that I am using the latest version of DM referenced by these sources:

"Releases
The userspace code (dmsetup and libdevmapper) is now maintained alongside the LVM2 source available from http://sources.redhat.com/lvm2/."

http://www.sourceware.org/dm/

and

"Source code

The source code is stored in git and can be accessed with git clone git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/lvm2.git
There is a web interface to git at http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/lvm2.git"

http://sources.redhat.com/lvm2/

so finally I've got DM of version 1.02.77 within lvm2 package of version 2.02.98 from http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/lvm2.git, it's of latest released version in the provided list. Most recent lvm2 package from master branch of 2.02.99 version contains DM ofversion 1.02.78 which has no attribute "drop_writes" in sources as well.

Thanks,
Alexander Tsvetkov

Quoted 6 lines

Patches are welcome...

Cheers,

Dave.

Quoted 7 lines

PS: please reply-to-all for mailing list traffic, not by private email. I've re-added the XFS list to the CC list.

PPS: Top posting destroys the context of your reply - nobody has any idea of what part of the previous message you are responding to. Repsonding inline is much easier to follow with when conversions get long...

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs