Bug in x86_64 do_cpuid()
It seems there's a bug in the x86_64 version of do_cpuid() that causes fio to segfault when built with clang at lower optimization levels:
static inline void do_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx)
{
asm volatile("cpuid"
: "=a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "=r" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx)
: "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx)
: "memory");
}via Tijl Coosemans:
Should be: "=c" (*ecx)
But you can also use the '+' modifier and remove the input operands:
: "+a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "+c" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx) :
: "memory"
Signature · 1 line
Bruce Cran
Quoted 14 lines · Bruce Cran
It seems there's a bug in the
x86_64version ofdo_cpuid()that causes fio to segfault when built with clang at lower optimization levels:static inline void do_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx){ asm volatile("cpuid" : "=a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "=r" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx) : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx) : "memory"); }via Tijl Coosemans:
Quoted 7 lines
Should be: "=c" (*ecx)
But you can also use the '+' modifier and remove the input operands:
: "+a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "+c" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx) :
: "memory"
+a/+c doesn't work, but =c will do the trick.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe