bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond_alb_monitor()
Subsystems (3)
PATCH v5 3/11 bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond_alb_monitor()
The bond_alb_monitor use bond lock to protect the bond slave list, it is no effect here, we need to use RTNL or RCU to replace bond lock, the bond_alb_monitor will called 10 times one second, RTNL may loss performance here, so I replace bond lock with RCU to protect the bond slave list, also the RTNL is preserved, the logic of the monitor did not changed.
Suggested-by Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
Suggested-by Jay Vosburgh <[email protected]>
Suggested-by Veaceslav Falico <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Ding Tianhong <[email protected]>
--- drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 22 +++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c +9 -13
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static void rlb_rebalance(struct bonding *bond)for (; hash_index !=RLB_NULL_INDEX ; hash_index = client_info->used_next) { client_info = &(bond_info->rx_hashtbl[hash_index]); - assigned_slave =rlb_next_rx_slave (bond); + assigned_slave =__rlb_next_rx_slave (bond);if (assigned_slave && (client_info->slave != assigned_slave)) { client_info->slave = assigned_slave; client_info->ntt =1 ;
@@ -1495,14 +1495,14 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)struct list_head *iter;struct slave *slave; -read_lock (&bond->lock); -if (!bond_has_slaves (bond)) { bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter =0 ; bond_info->lp_counter =0 ; goto re_arm; } +rcu_read_lock (); + bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter++; bond_info->lp_counter++;
@@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)*/ read_lock (&bond->curr_slave_lock); -bond_for_each_slave (bond, slave, iter) +bond_for_each_slave_rcu (bond, slave, iter)alb_send_learning_packets (slave, slave->dev->dev_addr);read_unlock (&bond->curr_slave_lock);
@@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)read_lock (&bond->curr_slave_lock); -bond_for_each_slave (bond, slave, iter) { +bond_for_each_slave_rcu (bond, slave, iter) {tlb_clear_slave (bond, slave,1 );if (slave == bond->curr_active_slave) { SLAVE_TLB_INFO(slave).load =
@@ -1552,11 +1552,9 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)* dev_set_promiscuity requires rtnl and * nothing else. Avoid race with bond_close. */ -read_unlock (&bond->lock); -if (!rtnl_trylock ()) { -read_lock (&bond->lock); +rcu_read_unlock (); +if (!rtnl_trylock ()) goto re_arm; - } bond_info->rlb_promisc_timeout_counter =0 ;
@@ -1568,7 +1566,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work) bond_info->primary_is_promisc =0 ;rtnl_unlock (); -read_lock (&bond->lock); +rcu_read_lock (); }if (bond_info->rlb_rebalance) {
@@ -1590,11 +1588,9 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work) } } } - +rcu_read_unlock (); re_arm:queue_delayed_work (bond->wq, &bond->alb_work, alb_delta_in_ticks); - -read_unlock (&bond->lock); }/* assumption: called before the slave is attached to the bond
Signature · 1 line
1.8.2.1