Skip to contentSkip to conversation

arm-soc: Xilinx Zynq dt changes for v3.14

DISCUSSION Michal Simek 5 participants 8 messages Dec 13, 2013 – Dec 27, 2013

lore
Share & tools
lore

Michal Simek

author
#0 lore raw

Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof,

Please pull these dt changes to your tree.

Thanks,
Michal

The following changes since commit dc1ccc48159d63eca5089e507c82c7d22ef60839:

Linux 3.13-rc2 (2013-11-29 12:57:14 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-dt-for-3.14

for you to fetch changes up to 41e4cdb95efa7e8fc88c65cb3c7221e89b9efb49:

arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node (2013-12-12 09:50:23 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
arm: Xilinx Zynq dt patches for v3.14

- Add gem support
- Add cpus node
- TTC cleanup

----------------------------------------------------------------
Soren Brinkmann (2):
arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes
arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node

Steffen Trumtrar (1):
ARM: zynq: add gem support

 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts |  5 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts |  5 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts   |  5 +++++
 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Signature · 14 lines
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131213/34badfe2/attachment.sig>
#1 lore raw

1. Address it to arm at kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people individually. The whole point of arm at kernel.org is that it reaches the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that you send your email without you needing to know who they are.

2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as a pull request message.

Thanks.

author
#2 lore raw

Hi Russell,

Quoted 7 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux

1. Address it to arm at kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people individually. The whole point of arm at kernel.org is that it reaches the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that you send your email without you needing to know who they are.

2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as a pull request message.

Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done before and this is the first complain I have got.

Thanks,
Michal

Signature · 14 lines
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131213/faae07da/attachment.sig>
#3 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Michal Simek

Hi Russell,

Quoted 5 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux

1. Address it to arm at kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people individually. The whole point of arm at kernel.org is that it reaches the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that you send your email without you needing to know who they are.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as a pull request message.

Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done before and this is the first complain I have got.

I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint.

-Olof

author
#4 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Olof Johansson
Quoted 8 lines · Michal Simek

Hi Russell,

Quoted 5 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux

1. Address it to arm at kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people individually. The whole point of arm at kernel.org is that it reaches the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that you send your email without you needing to know who they are.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as a pull request message.

Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done before and this is the first complain I have got.

I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint.

that's how I take it.
The point here is just if I should send pull request again.

Thanks,
Michal

Signature · 14 lines
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131218/eef9e1d8/attachment.sig>
#5 lore raw
Quoted 13 lines · Michal Simek
Quoted 12 lines · Olof Johansson
Quoted 11 lines · Michal Simek

Hi Russell,

Quoted 7 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux

1. Address it to arm at kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people individually. The whole point of arm at kernel.org is that it reaches the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that you send your email without you needing to know who they are.

2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as a pull request message.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done before and this is the first complain I have got.

I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint.

that's how I take it.
The point here is just if I should send pull request again.

No need to send again.

Kevin

#6 lore raw
In reply to Michal Simek
Quoted 3 lines · Michal Simek

Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof,

Please pull these dt changes to your tree.

Pulled, however:

Quoted 6 lines

Soren Brinkmann (2):
arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes
arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node

Steffen Trumtrar (1):
ARM: zynq: add gem support

Minor nit: Please be consistent with patch subjects. We try to stick to:

ARM: <platform>: <...>

-Olof

#7 lore raw

Hi Olof,

Quoted 11 lines · Olof Johansson
Quoted 3 lines · Michal Simek

Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof,

Please pull these dt changes to your tree.

Pulled, however:

Quoted 4 lines

Soren Brinkmann (2):
arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes
arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Steffen Trumtrar (1):
ARM: zynq: add gem support

Minor nit: Please be consistent with patch subjects. We try to stick to:

ARM: <platform>: <...>

I'll keep that in mind for future submissions,

Thanks,
S?ren