mm: kernel BUG at mm/mlock.c:82!
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've stumbled on the following spew.
Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In try_to_unmap_cluster():
page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte);
BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page));
if (locked_vma) {
mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */
if (page == check_page)
ret = SWAP_MLOCK;
continue; /* don't unmap */
}And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
I couldn't find anything that recently changed in those codepaths, so I'm a bit lost.
[ 253.869145] kernel BUG at mm/mlock.c:82! [ 253.869549] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 253.870098] Dumping ftrace buffer: [ 253.870098] (ftrace buffer empty) [ 253.870098] Modules linked in: [ 253.870098] CPU: 10 PID: 9162 Comm: trinity-child75 Tainted: G W 3.13.0-rc 4-next-20131216-sasha-00011-g5f105ec-dirty #4137 [ 253.873310] task: ffff8800c98cb000 ti: ffff8804d34e8000 task.ti: ffff8804d34e8000 [ 253.873310] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81281f28>] [<ffffffff81281f28>] mlock_vma_page+0x18 /0xc0 [ 253.873310] RSP: 0000:ffff8804d34e99e8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 253.873310] RAX: 006fffff8038002c RBX: ffffea00474944c0 RCX: ffff880807636000 [ 253.873310] RDX: ffffea0000000000 RSI: 00007f17a9bca000 RDI: ffffea00474944c0 [ 253.873310] RBP: ffff8804d34e99f8 R08: ffff880807020000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 253.873310] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000002000 R12: 00007f17a9bca000 [ 253.873310] R13: ffffea00474944c0 R14: 00007f17a9be0000 R15: ffff880807020000 [ 253.873310] FS: 00007f17aa31a700(0000) GS:ffff8801c9c00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000 0000 [ 253.873310] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 253.873310] CR2: 00007f17a94fa000 CR3: 00000004d3b02000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 253.873310] DR0: 00007f17a74ca000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 253.873310] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600 [ 253.873310] Stack: [ 253.873310] 0000000b3de28067 ffff880b3de28e50 ffff8804d34e9aa8 ffffffff8128bc31 [ 253.873310] 0000000000000301 ffffea0011850220 ffff8809a4039000 ffffea0011850238 [ 253.873310] ffff8804d34e9aa8 ffff880807636060 0000000000000001 ffff880807636348 [ 253.873310] Call Trace: [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128bc31>] try_to_unmap_cluster+0x1c1/0x340 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128c60a>] try_to_unmap_file+0x20a/0x2e0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128c7b3>] try_to_unmap+0x73/0x90 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b526d>] __unmap_and_move+0x18d/0x250 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b53e9>] unmap_and_move+0xb9/0x180 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b559b>] migrate_pages+0xeb/0x2f0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a0660>] ? queue_pages_pte_range+0x1a0/0x1a0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a193c>] migrate_to_node+0x9c/0xc0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a30b8>] do_migrate_pages+0x1b8/0x240 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a3456>] SYSC_migrate_pages+0x316/0x380 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a31ec>] ? SYSC_migrate_pages+0xac/0x380 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff811763c6>] ? vtime_account_user+0x96/0xb0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a34ce>] SyS_migrate_pages+0xe/0x10 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff843c4990>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 [ 253.873310] Code: 0f 1f 00 65 48 ff 04 25 10 25 1d 00 48 83 c4 08 5b c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 53 48 83 ec 08 66 66 66 66 90 48 8b 07 48 89 fb a8 01 75 10 <0f> 0b 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 eb fe 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f0 0f ba 2f 15 [ 253.873310] RIP [<ffffffff81281f28>] mlock_vma_page+0x18/0xc0 [ 253.873310] RSP <ffff8804d34e99e8> [ 253.904194] ---[ end trace be59c4a7f8edab3f ]---
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
cc'd more people.
Quoted 19 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've
stumbled on the following spew.Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }
Quoted 2 lines
And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Yes, I didn't see any place locked the corresponding page in try_to_unmap_cluster().
I'm afraid adding lock_page() over there may cause potential deadlock. How about just remove the BUG_ON() in mlock_vma_page()?
Quoted 71 lines
I couldn't find anything that recently changed in those codepaths, so I'm a bit lost.
[ 253.869145] kernel BUG at mm/mlock.c:82! [ 253.869549] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 253.870098] Dumping ftrace buffer: [ 253.870098] (ftrace buffer empty) [ 253.870098] Modules linked in: [ 253.870098] CPU: 10 PID: 9162 Comm: trinity-child75 Tainted: G W 3.13.0-rc 4-next-20131216-sasha-00011-g5f105ec-dirty #4137 [ 253.873310] task: ffff8800c98cb000 ti: ffff8804d34e8000 task.ti: ffff8804d34e8000 [ 253.873310] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81281f28>] [<ffffffff81281f28>] mlock_vma_page+0x18 /0xc0 [ 253.873310] RSP: 0000:ffff8804d34e99e8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 253.873310] RAX: 006fffff8038002c RBX: ffffea00474944c0 RCX: ffff880807636000 [ 253.873310] RDX: ffffea0000000000 RSI: 00007f17a9bca000 RDI: ffffea00474944c0 [ 253.873310] RBP: ffff8804d34e99f8 R08: ffff880807020000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 253.873310] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000002000 R12: 00007f17a9bca000 [ 253.873310] R13: ffffea00474944c0 R14: 00007f17a9be0000 R15: ffff880807020000 [ 253.873310] FS: 00007f17aa31a700(0000) GS:ffff8801c9c00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000 0000 [ 253.873310] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 253.873310] CR2: 00007f17a94fa000 CR3: 00000004d3b02000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 253.873310] DR0: 00007f17a74ca000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 253.873310] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600 [ 253.873310] Stack: [ 253.873310] 0000000b3de28067 ffff880b3de28e50 ffff8804d34e9aa8 ffffffff8128bc31 [ 253.873310] 0000000000000301 ffffea0011850220 ffff8809a4039000 ffffea0011850238 [ 253.873310] ffff8804d34e9aa8 ffff880807636060 0000000000000001 ffff880807636348 [ 253.873310] Call Trace: [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128bc31>] try_to_unmap_cluster+0x1c1/0x340 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128c60a>] try_to_unmap_file+0x20a/0x2e0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128c7b3>] try_to_unmap+0x73/0x90 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b526d>] __unmap_and_move+0x18d/0x250 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b53e9>] unmap_and_move+0xb9/0x180 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b559b>] migrate_pages+0xeb/0x2f0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a0660>] ? queue_pages_pte_range+0x1a0/0x1a0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a193c>] migrate_to_node+0x9c/0xc0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a30b8>] do_migrate_pages+0x1b8/0x240 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a3456>] SYSC_migrate_pages+0x316/0x380 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a31ec>] ? SYSC_migrate_pages+0xac/0x380 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff811763c6>] ? vtime_account_user+0x96/0xb0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a34ce>] SyS_migrate_pages+0xe/0x10 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff843c4990>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 [ 253.873310] Code: 0f 1f 00 65 48 ff 04 25 10 25 1d 00 48 83 c4 08 5b c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 53 48 83 ec 08 66 66 66 66 90 48 8b 07 48 89 fb a8 01 75 10 <0f> 0b 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 eb fe 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f0 0f ba 2f 15 [ 253.873310] RIP [<ffffffff81281f28>] mlock_vma_page+0x18/0xc0 [ 253.873310] RSP <ffff8804d34e99e8> [ 253.904194] ---[ end trace be59c4a7f8edab3f ]---Signature · 4 lines
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Signature · 8 lines
Regards, -Bob -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 22 lines · Bob Liu
cc'd more people.
Quoted 19 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've
stumbled on the following spew.Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Yes, I didn't see any place locked the corresponding page in
try_to_unmap_cluster().I'm afraid adding
lock_page()over there may cause potential deadlock. How about just remove theBUG_ON()inmlock_vma_page()?
Welp, it's been there for 5 years now - there should be a good reason to justify removing it.
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Hi Sasha,
Quoted 26 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 25 lines · Bob Liu
cc'd more people.
Quoted 21 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've
stumbled on the following spew.Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Yes, I didn't see any place locked the corresponding page in
try_to_unmap_cluster().I'm afraid adding
lock_page()over there may cause potential deadlock. How about just remove theBUG_ON()inmlock_vma_page()?Welp, it's been there for 5 years now - there should be a good reason to justify removing it.
Page should be locked before invoke try_to_unmap(), this check can't be removed since this bug is just triggered by confirm !check page hold page lock in virtual scan during nolinear VMAs pages aging. Avoid to confirm !check page hold page lock is acceptable.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Quoted 9 lines
Thanks,
Sasha--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 44 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wanpeng Li
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:27 AM
To: Sasha Levin
Cc: Bob Liu; Andrew Morton; [email protected]; Michel Lespinasse; [email protected]; Motohiro Kosaki JP; [email protected]
Subject: Re: mm: kernel BUG atmm/mlock.c:82!Hi Sasha,
Quoted 31 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 29 lines · Bob Liu
cc'd more people.
Quoted 18 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've stumbled on the following spew.
Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }Quoted 2 lines
And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Yes, I didn't see any place locked the corresponding page in
try_to_unmap_cluster().I'm afraid adding
lock_page()over there may cause potential deadlock. How about just remove theBUG_ON()inmlock_vma_page()?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Welp, it's been there for 5 years now - there should be a good reason to
justify removing it.
Quoted 1 line
Page should be locked before invoke
try_to_unmap(), this check can't be removed since this bug is just triggered by confirm !check page hold page lock in virtual scan during nolinear VMAs pages aging. Avoid to confirm !check page hold page lock is acceptable.
That's a try_to_unmap()'s assumption and it already have BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page)).
We can remove wrong BUG_ON from mlock_vma_page() simply. Mlock_vma_page() doesn't depend on page-locked.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Hi Motohiro,
Quoted 48 lines · Motohiro Kosaki
Quoted 48 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wanpeng Li
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:27 AM
To: Sasha Levin
Cc: Bob Liu; Andrew Morton; [email protected]; Michel Lespinasse; [email protected]; Motohiro Kosaki JP; [email protected]
Subject: Re: mm: kernel BUG atmm/mlock.c:82!Hi Sasha,
Quoted 25 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 24 lines · Bob Liu
cc'd more people.
Quoted 20 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've stumbled on the following spew.
Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Yes, I didn't see any place locked the corresponding page in
try_to_unmap_cluster().I'm afraid adding
lock_page()over there may cause potential deadlock. How about just remove theBUG_ON()inmlock_vma_page()?Welp, it's been there for 5 years now - there should be a good reason to
justify removing it.
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Page should be locked before invoke
try_to_unmap(), this check can't be removed since this bug is just triggered by confirm !check page hold page lock in virtual scan during nolinear VMAs pages aging. Avoid to confirm !check page hold page lock is acceptable.That's a try_to_unmap()'s assumption and it already have BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page)).
We can remove wrongBUG_ONfrommlock_vma_page()simply.Mlock_vma_page()doesn't depend on page-locked.
There is a race between mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(). Both of them should hold page lock and have a BUG_ON assumption.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Quoted 1 line
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 55 lines · Wanpeng Li
Hi Motohiro,
Quoted 53 lines · Motohiro Kosaki
Quoted 52 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wanpeng Li
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:27 AM
To: Sasha Levin
Cc: Bob Liu; Andrew Morton; [email protected]; Michel Lespinasse; [email protected]; Motohiro Kosaki JP; [email protected]
Subject: Re: mm: kernel BUG atmm/mlock.c:82!Hi Sasha,
Quoted 25 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 24 lines · Bob Liu
cc'd more people.
Quoted 20 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've stumbled on the following spew.
Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Yes, I didn't see any place locked the corresponding page in
try_to_unmap_cluster().I'm afraid adding
lock_page()over there may cause potential deadlock. How about just remove theBUG_ON()inmlock_vma_page()?Welp, it's been there for 5 years now - there should be a good reason to
justify removing it.
Quoted 1 line
Page should be locked before invoke
try_to_unmap(), this check can't be removed since this bug is just triggered by confirm !check page hold page lock in virtual scan during nolinear VMAs pages aging. Avoid to confirm !check page hold page lock is acceptable.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
That's a try_to_unmap()'s assumption and it already have BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page)).
We can remove wrongBUG_ONfrommlock_vma_page()simply.Mlock_vma_page()doesn't depend on page-locked.There is a race between
mlock_vma_page()andmunlock_vma_page(). Both of them should hold page lock and have aBUG_ONassumption.
If mlock_vma_page() really need pagelocked, then we have to add lock_page() in try_to_unmap_cluster().
Else just remove the BUG_ON() to make things simple.
Signature · 8 lines
Regards, -Bob -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 55 lines · Wanpeng Li
Hi Motohiro,
Quoted 53 lines · Motohiro Kosaki
Quoted 52 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wanpeng Li
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:27 AM
To: Sasha Levin
Cc: Bob Liu; Andrew Morton; [email protected]; Michel Lespinasse; [email protected]; Motohiro Kosaki JP; [email protected]
Subject: Re: mm: kernel BUG atmm/mlock.c:82!Hi Sasha,
Quoted 25 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 24 lines · Bob Liu
cc'd more people.
Quoted 20 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've stumbled on the following spew.
Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Yes, I didn't see any place locked the corresponding page in
try_to_unmap_cluster().I'm afraid adding
lock_page()over there may cause potential deadlock. How about just remove theBUG_ON()inmlock_vma_page()?Welp, it's been there for 5 years now - there should be a good reason to
justify removing it.
Quoted 1 line
Page should be locked before invoke
try_to_unmap(), this check can't be removed since this bug is just triggered by confirm !check page hold page lock in virtual scan during nolinear VMAs pages aging. Avoid to confirm !check page hold page lock is acceptable.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
That's a try_to_unmap()'s assumption and it already have BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page)).
We can remove wrongBUG_ONfrommlock_vma_page()simply.Mlock_vma_page()doesn't depend on page-locked.There is a race between
mlock_vma_page()andmunlock_vma_page(). Both of them should hold page lock and have aBUG_ONassumption.
I think the atomic operations on PageMlocked prevent such races. Also these functions seem to be always called with mmap_sem held.
Quoted 11 lines
Regards,
Wanpeng LiQuoted 1 line
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20131218020239.GA16603@hacker.(null)
Quoted 67 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Wanpeng Li [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:03 PM
To: Motohiro Kosaki
Cc: Bob Liu; Andrew Morton; [email protected]; Michel Lespinasse; [email protected]; Motohiro Kosaki JP; [email protected]; Sasha Levin
Subject: Re: mm: kernel BUG atmm/mlock.c:82!Hi Motohiro,
Quoted 4 lines · Motohiro Kosaki
Quoted 4 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Quoted 50 lines
Quoted 49 lines
Behalf Of Wanpeng Li
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:27 AM
To: Sasha Levin
Cc: Bob Liu; Andrew Morton; [email protected]; Michel Lespinasse; [email protected]; Motohiro Kosaki JP; [email protected]
Subject: Re: mm: kernel BUG atmm/mlock.c:82!Hi Sasha,
Quoted 25 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 24 lines · Bob Liu
cc'd more people.
Quoted 20 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've stumbled on the following spew.
Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Yes, I didn't see any place locked the corresponding page in
try_to_unmap_cluster().I'm afraid adding
lock_page()over there may cause potential deadlock. How about just remove theBUG_ON()inmlock_vma_page()?Welp, it's been there for 5 years now - there should be a good reason to
justify removing it.
Quoted 1 line
Page should be locked before invoke
try_to_unmap(), this check can't be removed since this bug is just triggered by confirm !check page hold page lock in virtual scan during nolinear VMAs pages aging. Avoid to confirm !check page hold page lock is acceptable.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
That's a try_to_unmap()'s assumption and it already have
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page)).
Quoted 1 line
We can remove wrong
BUG_ONfrommlock_vma_page()simply.
Mlock_vma_page()doesn't depend on page-locked.Quoted 1 line
There is a race between
mlock_vma_page()andmunlock_vma_page(). Both of them should hold page lock and have aBUG_ONassumption.
Please explain which race you are worried. The main race of mlock and munlock are closed by PG_mlocked, not PG_locked.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Hi Sasha,
Quoted 17 lines · Sasha Levin
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next kernel, I've stumbled on the following spew.
Codewise, it's pretty straightforward. In
try_to_unmap_cluster():page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, *pte); BUG_ON(!page || PageAnon(page)); if (locked_vma) { mlock_vma_page(page); /* no-op if already mlocked */ if (page == check_page) ret = SWAP_MLOCK; continue; /* don't unmap */ }
Quoted 2 lines
And the BUG triggers once we see that 'page' isn't locked.
Could you test this patch?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=138726757627739&w=2
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Quoted 51 lines
I couldn't find anything that recently changed in those codepaths, so I'm a bit lost.
[ 253.869145] kernel BUG at mm/mlock.c:82! [ 253.869549] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 253.870098] Dumping ftrace buffer: [ 253.870098] (ftrace buffer empty) [ 253.870098] Modules linked in: [ 253.870098] CPU: 10 PID: 9162 Comm: trinity-child75 Tainted: G W 3.13.0-rc 4-next-20131216-sasha-00011-g5f105ec-dirty #4137 [ 253.873310] task: ffff8800c98cb000 ti: ffff8804d34e8000 task.ti: ffff8804d34e8000 [ 253.873310] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81281f28>] [<ffffffff81281f28>] mlock_vma_page+0x18 /0xc0 [ 253.873310] RSP: 0000:ffff8804d34e99e8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 253.873310] RAX: 006fffff8038002c RBX: ffffea00474944c0 RCX: ffff880807636000 [ 253.873310] RDX: ffffea0000000000 RSI: 00007f17a9bca000 RDI: ffffea00474944c0 [ 253.873310] RBP: ffff8804d34e99f8 R08: ffff880807020000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 253.873310] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000002000 R12: 00007f17a9bca000 [ 253.873310] R13: ffffea00474944c0 R14: 00007f17a9be0000 R15: ffff880807020000 [ 253.873310] FS: 00007f17aa31a700(0000) GS:ffff8801c9c00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000 0000 [ 253.873310] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 253.873310] CR2: 00007f17a94fa000 CR3: 00000004d3b02000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 253.873310] DR0: 00007f17a74ca000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 253.873310] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600 [ 253.873310] Stack: [ 253.873310] 0000000b3de28067 ffff880b3de28e50 ffff8804d34e9aa8 ffffffff8128bc31 [ 253.873310] 0000000000000301 ffffea0011850220 ffff8809a4039000 ffffea0011850238 [ 253.873310] ffff8804d34e9aa8 ffff880807636060 0000000000000001 ffff880807636348 [ 253.873310] Call Trace: [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128bc31>] try_to_unmap_cluster+0x1c1/0x340 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128c60a>] try_to_unmap_file+0x20a/0x2e0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff8128c7b3>] try_to_unmap+0x73/0x90 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b526d>] __unmap_and_move+0x18d/0x250 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b53e9>] unmap_and_move+0xb9/0x180 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812b559b>] migrate_pages+0xeb/0x2f0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a0660>] ? queue_pages_pte_range+0x1a0/0x1a0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a193c>] migrate_to_node+0x9c/0xc0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a30b8>] do_migrate_pages+0x1b8/0x240 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a3456>] SYSC_migrate_pages+0x316/0x380 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a31ec>] ? SYSC_migrate_pages+0xac/0x380 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff811763c6>] ? vtime_account_user+0x96/0xb0 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff812a34ce>] SyS_migrate_pages+0xe/0x10 [ 253.873310] [<ffffffff843c4990>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 [ 253.873310] Code: 0f 1f 00 65 48 ff 04 25 10 25 1d 00 48 83 c4 08 5b c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 53 48 83 ec 08 66 66 66 66 90 48 8b 07 48 89 fb a8 01 75 10 <0f> 0b 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 eb fe 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f0 0f ba 2f 15 [ 253.873310] RIP [<ffffffff81281f28>] mlock_vma_page+0x18/0xc0 [ 253.873310] RSP <ffff8804d34e99e8> [ 253.904194] ---[ end trace be59c4a7f8edab3f ]---
Quoted 5 lines
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>