Suspend issues with a LaCie USB hard disk connected
Hi,
I'm facing an issue putting an embedded system to sleep while a Lacie external USB hard disk is connected. Relevant kernel messages that occur at the attempt are:
[ 13.834731] PM: Sending message for entering DeepSleep mode [ 13.846575] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache [ 13.858818] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.862432] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 [ 13.867349] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.870626] Sense Key : 0x5 [current] [ 13.874602] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.877879] ASC=0x20 ASCQ=0x0 [ 13.885053] dpm_run_callback(): scsi_bus_suspend+0x0/0x20 returns -5 [ 13.901130] PM: Device 0:0:0:0 failed to suspend async: error -5 [ 13.907507] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event
detected
What happens is that in sd_sync_cache(), scsi_execute_req_flags() returns 0x08000002, so driver_byte(res) evaluates to DRIVER_SENSE and host_byte(res) is DID_OK, which is an unhandled case that leads to -EIO eventually.
I have admittedly not much clue about the SCSI layer, so I wonder what would be the best way to fix this. Should DID_OK just be handled as non-error condition in the switch? Should the suspend call chain ignore such errors from sd_sync_cache()?
I'm open to suggestions and happy to test patches.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 24 lines · Daniel Mack
Hi,
I'm facing an issue putting an embedded system to sleep while a Lacie external USB hard disk is connected. Relevant kernel messages that occur at the attempt are:
[ 13.834731] PM: Sending message for entering DeepSleep mode [ 13.846575] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache [ 13.858818] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.862432] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 [ 13.867349] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.870626] Sense Key : 0x5 [current] [ 13.874602] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.877879] ASC=0x20 ASCQ=0x0 [ 13.885053] dpm_run_callback(): scsi_bus_suspend+0x0/0x20 returns -5 [ 13.901130] PM: Device 0:0:0:0 failed to suspend async: error -5 [ 13.907507] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake eventdetected
What happens is that in
sd_sync_cache(),scsi_execute_req_flags()returns0x08000002, sodriver_byte(res)evaluates toDRIVER_SENSEandhost_byte(res)isDID_OK, which is an unhandled case that leads to-EIOeventually.
Quoted 6 lines
I have admittedly not much clue about the SCSI layer, so I wonder what would be the best way to fix this. Should
DID_OKjust be handled as non-error condition in the switch? Should the suspend call chain ignore such errors fromsd_sync_cache()?I'm open to suggestions and happy to test patches.
The Sense Key and ASC values indicate that the drive did not understand the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command. A usbmon trace would verify this; see the instructions in Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt.
Assuming that really is what happened, we have to decide how to handle the situation.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
Sorry for the long, primarily holiday-related delay on this.
Quoted 28 lines · Alan Stern
Quoted 27 lines · Daniel Mack
I'm facing an issue putting an embedded system to sleep while a Lacie external USB hard disk is connected. Relevant kernel messages that occur at the attempt are:
[ 13.834731] PM: Sending message for entering DeepSleep mode [ 13.846575] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache [ 13.858818] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.862432] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 [ 13.867349] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.870626] Sense Key : 0x5 [current] [ 13.874602] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.877879] ASC=0x20 ASCQ=0x0 [ 13.885053] dpm_run_callback(): scsi_bus_suspend+0x0/0x20 returns -5 [ 13.901130] PM: Device 0:0:0:0 failed to suspend async: error -5 [ 13.907507] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake eventdetected
What happens is that in
sd_sync_cache(),scsi_execute_req_flags()returns0x08000002, sodriver_byte(res)evaluates toDRIVER_SENSEandhost_byte(res)isDID_OK, which is an unhandled case that leads to-EIOeventually.I have admittedly not much clue about the SCSI layer, so I wonder what would be the best way to fix this. Should
DID_OKjust be handled as non-error condition in the switch? Should the suspend call chain ignore such errors fromsd_sync_cache()?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
I'm open to suggestions and happy to test patches.
The Sense Key and ASC values indicate that the drive did not understand the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command. A usbmon trace would verify this; see the instructions in
Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt.Assuming that really is what happened, we have to decide how to handle the situation.
Ok, this is the usbmon trace that I captured when the system goes to suspend with the USB storage media connected but unmounted:
cebe5e00 3629314504 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 10000000 00000000 00000a35 00000000 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e00 3629315214 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cebe5e00 3629315413 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e00 3629315492 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 10000000 00000000 01 cebe5e00 3629315571 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 11000000 12000000 80000603 00000012 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e00 3629315606 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cecd4580 3629315681 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 18 <cecd4580 3629315744 C Bi:1:003:1 0 18 = 70000500 0000000a 00000000 20000000 0000cebe5e00 3629315772 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e00 3629315817 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 11000000 00000000 00 cebe5e00 3629319750 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 12000000 00000000 00000a35 00000000 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e00 3629319826 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cebe5e00 3629319856 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e00 3629319910 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 12000000 00000000 01 cebe5e00 3629319964 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 13000000 12000000 80000603 00000012 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e00 3629319996 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cecd4300 3629320026 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 18 <cecd4300 3629320086 C Bi:1:003:1 0 18 = 70000500 0000000a 00000000 20000000 0000cebe5e00 3629320111 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e00 3629320152 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 13000000 00000000 00 cebe5e00 3629320360 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 14000000 00000000 00000a35 00000000 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e00 3629320610 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cebe5e00 3629320670 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e00 3629320714 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 14000000 00000000 01 cebe5e00 3629320752 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 15000000 12000000 80000603 00000012 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e00 3629320809 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cecd4300 3629320834 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 18 <cecd4300 3629320863 C Bi:1:003:1 0 18 = 70000500 0000000a 00000000 20000000 0000cebe5e00 3629320885 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e00 3629320923 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 15000000 00000000 00 ceb36280 3629350243 C Ii:1:001:1 -2:2048 0cecd4800 3630011191 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0001 0004 4 < cecd4800 3630011333 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 07051200cecd4800 3630011574 S Co:1:001:0 s 23 01 0011 0001 0000 0 cecd4800 3630011699 C Co:1:001:0 0 0cecd4800 3630011745 S Co:1:001:0 s 23 01 0014 0001 0000 0 cecd4800 3630011789 C Co:1:001:0 0 0ceb36280 3630112579 S Ii:1:001:1 -115:2048 4 <cecd4500 3630112825 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0001 0004 4 < cecd4500 3630112952 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 07050000cecd4500 3630113001 S Co:1:001:0 s 23 01 0002 0001 0000 0 cecd4500 3630113084 C Co:1:001:0 0 0ceb36280 3630122552 C Ii:1:001:1 0:2048 1 = 02ceb36280 3630122566 S Ii:1:001:1 -115:2048 4 <cecd4500 3630152573 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0001 0004 4 < cecd4500 3630152625 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 03050000cecd4500 3630172588 S Ci:1:003:0 s 80 00 0000 0000 0002 2 < cecd4500 3630172603 E Ci:1:003:0 -19 0cecd4500 3630172744 S Co:1:001:0 s 23 03 0004 0001 0000 0 cecd4500 3630184219 C Co:1:001:0 0 0cecd4500 3630242590 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0001 0004 4 < cecd4500 3630242657 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 13050000cecd4500 3630302564 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0001 0004 4 < cecd4500 3630302609 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 13050000ceb36280 3630315035 C Ii:1:001:1 0:2048 1 = 02
FWIW, the following patch seems to work fine on our machines, but as I said, I'm uncertain wrt to whether that's the right approach.
drivers/scsi/sd.c +1 -0
@@ -1469,6 +1469,7 @@ static int sd_sync_cache(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)return 0 ;switch (host_byte (res)) { +case DID_OK :/* ignore errors due to racing a disconnection */ case DID_BAD_TARGET :case DID_NO_CONNECT :
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 42 lines · Daniel Mack
Hi,
Sorry for the long, primarily holiday-related delay on this.
Quoted 28 lines · Alan Stern
Quoted 27 lines · Daniel Mack
I'm facing an issue putting an embedded system to sleep while a Lacie external USB hard disk is connected. Relevant kernel messages that occur at the attempt are:
[ 13.834731] PM: Sending message for entering DeepSleep mode [ 13.846575] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache [ 13.858818] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.862432] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 [ 13.867349] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.870626] Sense Key : 0x5 [current] [ 13.874602] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.877879] ASC=0x20 ASCQ=0x0 [ 13.885053] dpm_run_callback(): scsi_bus_suspend+0x0/0x20 returns -5 [ 13.901130] PM: Device 0:0:0:0 failed to suspend async: error -5 [ 13.907507] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake eventdetected
What happens is that in
sd_sync_cache(),scsi_execute_req_flags()returns0x08000002, sodriver_byte(res)evaluates toDRIVER_SENSEandhost_byte(res)isDID_OK, which is an unhandled case that leads to-EIOeventually.I have admittedly not much clue about the SCSI layer, so I wonder what would be the best way to fix this. Should
DID_OKjust be handled as non-error condition in the switch? Should the suspend call chain ignore such errors fromsd_sync_cache()?Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
I'm open to suggestions and happy to test patches.
The Sense Key and ASC values indicate that the drive did not understand the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command. A usbmon trace would verify this; see the instructions in
Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt.Assuming that really is what happened, we have to decide how to handle the situation.
Quoted 8 lines
Ok, this is the usbmon trace that I captured when the system goes to suspend with the USB storage media connected but unmounted:
cebe5e003629314504 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 10000000 0000000000000a3500000000 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e003629315214 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cebe5e003629315413 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e003629315492 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 10000000 00000000 01
That's the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command, with an error return status.
Quoted 8 lines
cebe5e003629315571 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 11000000 12000000 80000603 00000012 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e003629315606 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cecd45803629315681 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 18 <cecd45803629315744 C Bi:1:003:1 0 18 = 700005000000000a00000000 20000000 0000cebe5e003629315772 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e003629315817 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 11000000 00000000 00
And that's the sense data, confirming SK=5 and ASC=20. This means the drive doesn't understand the command.
There's more stuff later on in the usbmon trace that I don't understand. But if everything else works okay, it won't matter.
Quoted 9 lines
FWIW, the following patch seems to work fine on our machines, but as I said, I'm uncertain wrt to whether that's the right approach.
drivers/scsi/sd.c +0
-0
drivers/scsi/sd.c static int sd_sync_cache(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) · line 1475
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/scsi/sd.c +1
-0@@ -1469,6 +1469,7 @@ static int sd_sync_cache(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)return 0 ;switch (host_byte (res)) { +case DID_OK :/* ignore errors due to racing a disconnection */ case DID_BAD_TARGET :case DID_NO_CONNECT :
I don't think that is the right thing to do. Try this patch instead.
Alan Stern
drivers/scsi/sd.c +2 -2
@@ -1463,8 +1463,8 @@ static int sd_sync_cache(struct scsi_dissd_print_sense_hdr (sdkp, &sshdr);/* we need to evaluate the error return */ if (scsi_sense_valid (&sshdr) && -/* 0x3a is medium not present */ - sshdr.asc ==0x3a ) + (sshdr.asc ==0x3a ||/* medium not present */ + sshdr.asc ==0x20 ))/* invalid command */ /* this is no error here */ return 0 ;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Daniel Mack
Tested-byHi Alan,
Quoted 64 lines · Alan Stern
Quoted 42 lines · Daniel Mack
Hi,
Sorry for the long, primarily holiday-related delay on this.
Quoted 28 lines · Alan Stern
Quoted 27 lines · Daniel Mack
I'm facing an issue putting an embedded system to sleep while a Lacie external USB hard disk is connected. Relevant kernel messages that occur at the attempt are:
[ 13.834731] PM: Sending message for entering DeepSleep mode [ 13.846575] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache [ 13.858818] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.862432] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 [ 13.867349] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.870626] Sense Key : 0x5 [current] [ 13.874602] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] [ 13.877879] ASC=0x20 ASCQ=0x0 [ 13.885053] dpm_run_callback(): scsi_bus_suspend+0x0/0x20 returns -5 [ 13.901130] PM: Device 0:0:0:0 failed to suspend async: error -5 [ 13.907507] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake eventdetected
What happens is that in
sd_sync_cache(),scsi_execute_req_flags()returns0x08000002, sodriver_byte(res)evaluates toDRIVER_SENSEandhost_byte(res)isDID_OK, which is an unhandled case that leads to-EIOeventually.I have admittedly not much clue about the SCSI layer, so I wonder what would be the best way to fix this. Should
DID_OKjust be handled as non-error condition in the switch? Should the suspend call chain ignore such errors fromsd_sync_cache()?Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
I'm open to suggestions and happy to test patches.
The Sense Key and ASC values indicate that the drive did not understand the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command. A usbmon trace would verify this; see the instructions in
Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt.Assuming that really is what happened, we have to decide how to handle the situation.
Quoted 8 lines
Ok, this is the usbmon trace that I captured when the system goes to suspend with the USB storage media connected but unmounted:
cebe5e003629314504 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 10000000 0000000000000a3500000000 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e003629315214 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cebe5e003629315413 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e003629315492 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 10000000 00000000 01That's the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command, with an error return status.
Quoted 8 lines
cebe5e003629315571 S Bo:1:003:2 -115 31 = 55534243 11000000 12000000 80000603 00000012 00000000 00000000 000000cebe5e003629315606 C Bo:1:003:2 0 31 >cecd45803629315681 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 18 <cecd45803629315744 C Bi:1:003:1 0 18 = 700005000000000a00000000 20000000 0000cebe5e003629315772 S Bi:1:003:1 -115 13 <cebe5e003629315817 C Bi:1:003:1 0 13 = 55534253 11000000 00000000 00
Quoted 2 lines
And that's the sense data, confirming SK=5 and ASC=20. This means the drive doesn't understand the command.
Ok.
Quoted 2 lines
There's more stuff later on in the usbmon trace that I don't understand. But if everything else works okay, it won't matter.
The host controller tried to reset the port and the device, whatever that results in. You're right, that is unrelated.
Quoted 1 line
I don't think that is the right thing to do. Try this patch instead.
[...]
Quoted 5 lines
Index:
usb-3.13/drivers/scsi/sd.c
===================================================================
drivers/scsi/sd.c static int sd_sync_cache(struct scsi_dis · line 1470
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/sd.c +2
-2@@ -1463,8 +1463,8 @@ static int sd_sync_cache(struct scsi_dissd_print_sense_hdr (sdkp, &sshdr);/* we need to evaluate the error return */ if (scsi_sense_valid (&sshdr) && -/* 0x3a is medium not present */ - sshdr.asc ==0x3a ) + (sshdr.asc ==0x3a ||/* medium not present */ + sshdr.asc ==0x20 ))/* invalid command */ /* this is no error here */ return 0 ;
That seems to work equally well for me, thanks!
Feel free to add when submitting:
Thanks for your help!
Daniel