unmaintained layers

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-aarch64
meta-acer
meta-ada
meta-android
meta-angstrom
meta-arago-distro
meta-arago-extras
meta-asus
meta-aurora
meta-baryon
meta-beagleboard
meta-beagleboard-extras
meta-browser
meta-bug
meta-buglabs
meta-chicken
meta-chiefriver
meta-clutter
meta-crownbay
meta-crystalforest
meta-cubox
meta-darwin
meta-eca
meta-efikamx
meta-efl
meta-eldk
meta-emenlow
meta-erlang
meta-ettus
meta-filesystems
meta-fri2
meta-fsl-arm
meta-fsl-arm-extra
meta-fsl-demos
meta-fsl-ppc
meta-fso
meta-games
meta-geeksphone
meta-gir
meta-gnome
meta-gpe
meta-gstreamer10
meta-guacamayo
meta-gumstix
meta-gumstix-community
meta-gumstix-extras
meta-hamradio
meta-handheld
meta-hipos
meta-htc

meta-igep
meta-initramfs
meta-intel
meta-ivi
meta-jasperforest
meta-java
meta-kde
meta-kernel-dev

meta-kirkwood
meta-linaro
meta-linaro-toolchain
meta-lsi
meta-lxcbench
meta-measured
meta-mentor
meta-micro
meta-mingw
meta-minnow
meta-mono
meta-multimedia
meta-n450
meta-netbookpro
meta-netmodule
meta-networking
meta-nokia
meta-nslu2

meta-nuc
meta-oe
meta-openmoko
meta-openpandora
meta-openstack
meta-openstack-compute-deploy
meta-openstack-controller-deploy
meta-openstack-qemu

meta-opie
meta-oracle-java
meta-osmocombb
meta-ouya
meta-palm
meta-perl
meta-picosam9
meta-qt3
meta-qt5
meta-raspberrypi
meta-realtime

meta-ro-rootfs
meta-romley
meta-ros
meta-ruby
meta-samsung
meta-sdr
meta-security
meta-selinux
meta-shr
meta-shr-distro
meta-slugos
meta-smalltalk
meta-sourcery
meta-sugarbay
meta-sunxi

meta-sys940x
meta-systemd
meta-telephony
meta-telldus
meta-ti
meta-tlk
meta-tracing
meta-virtualization

meta-web-kiosk
meta-webos
meta-webos-ports
meta-webserver
meta-woce
meta-x10
meta-xfce
meta-xilinx
meta-xilinx-community
meta-yassl
meta-yocto
meta-yocto-bsp
meta-zynq
meta-zynq-milo
openembedded-core
toolchain-layer

Thank you for your input, and best regards,
Trevor

[1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Quoted 6 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ?

Quoted 52 lines

meta-aarch64
meta-acer
meta-ada
meta-android
meta-angstrom
meta-arago-distro
meta-arago-extras
meta-asus
meta-aurora
meta-baryon
meta-beagleboard
meta-beagleboard-extras
meta-browser
meta-bug
meta-buglabs
meta-chicken
meta-chiefriver
meta-clutter
meta-crownbay
meta-crystalforest
meta-cubox
meta-darwin
meta-eca
meta-efikamx
meta-efl
meta-eldk
meta-emenlow
meta-erlang
meta-ettus
meta-filesystems
meta-fri2
meta-fsl-arm
meta-fsl-arm-extra
meta-fsl-demos
meta-fsl-ppc
meta-fso
meta-games
meta-geeksphone
meta-gir
meta-gnome
meta-gpe
meta-gstreamer10
meta-guacamayo
meta-gumstix
meta-gumstix-community
meta-gumstix-extras
meta-hamradio
meta-handheld
meta-hipos
meta-htc

Quoted 8 lines

meta-igep
meta-initramfs
meta-intel
meta-ivi
meta-jasperforest
meta-java
meta-kde
meta-kernel-dev

maintained.

Quoted 18 lines

meta-kirkwood
meta-linaro
meta-linaro-toolchain
meta-lsi
meta-lxcbench
meta-measured
meta-mentor
meta-micro
meta-mingw
meta-minnow
meta-mono
meta-multimedia
meta-n450
meta-netbookpro
meta-netmodule
meta-networking
meta-nokia
meta-nslu2

Quoted 8 lines

meta-nuc
meta-oe
meta-openmoko
meta-openpandora
meta-openstack
meta-openstack-compute-deploy
meta-openstack-controller-deploy
meta-openstack-qemu

All openstack layers are maintained.

Quoted 11 lines

meta-opie
meta-oracle-java
meta-osmocombb
meta-ouya
meta-palm
meta-perl
meta-picosam9
meta-qt3
meta-qt5
meta-raspberrypi
meta-realtime

mantained

Quoted 8 lines

meta-ro-rootfs
meta-romley
meta-ros
meta-ruby
meta-samsung
meta-sdr
meta-security
meta-selinux

Quoted 7 lines

meta-shr
meta-shr-distro
meta-slugos
meta-smalltalk
meta-sourcery
meta-sugarbay
meta-sunxi

Quoted 8 lines

meta-sys940x
meta-systemd
meta-telephony
meta-telldus
meta-ti
meta-tlk
meta-tracing
meta-virtualization

maintained

But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list, since it is long and I scanned
it quickly.

Bruce

Quoted 29 lines

meta-web-kiosk
meta-webos
meta-webos-ports
meta-webserver
meta-woce
meta-x10
meta-xfce
meta-xilinx
meta-xilinx-community
meta-yassl
meta-yocto
meta-yocto-bsp
meta-zynq
meta-zynq-milo
openembedded-core
toolchain-layer

Thank you for your input, and best regards,
Trevor

[1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Quoted 9 lines · Bruce Ashfield

Quoted 6 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Quoted 3 lines

Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an
opt-in query ?

I agree.. see below for mine..

Quoted 6 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ?

Quoted 50 lines

meta-aarch64
meta-acer
meta-ada
meta-android
meta-angstrom
meta-arago-distro
meta-arago-extras
meta-asus
meta-aurora
meta-baryon
meta-beagleboard
meta-beagleboard-extras
meta-browser
meta-bug
meta-buglabs
meta-chicken
meta-chiefriver
meta-clutter
meta-crownbay
meta-crystalforest
meta-cubox
meta-darwin
meta-eca
meta-efikamx
meta-efl
meta-eldk
meta-emenlow
meta-erlang
meta-ettus
meta-filesystems
meta-fri2
meta-fsl-arm
meta-fsl-arm-extra
meta-fsl-demos
meta-fsl-ppc
meta-fso
meta-games
meta-geeksphone
meta-gir
meta-gnome
meta-gpe
meta-gstreamer10
meta-guacamayo
meta-gumstix
meta-gumstix-community
meta-gumstix-extras
meta-hamradio
meta-handheld
meta-hipos
meta-htc

Quoted 8 lines

meta-igep
meta-initramfs
meta-intel
meta-ivi
meta-jasperforest
meta-java
meta-kde
meta-kernel-dev

maintained.

Quoted 18 lines

meta-kirkwood
meta-linaro
meta-linaro-toolchain
meta-lsi
meta-lxcbench
meta-measured
meta-mentor
meta-micro
meta-mingw
meta-minnow
meta-mono
meta-multimedia
meta-n450
meta-netbookpro
meta-netmodule
meta-networking
meta-nokia
meta-nslu2

Quoted 8 lines

meta-nuc
meta-oe
meta-openmoko
meta-openpandora
meta-openstack
meta-openstack-compute-deploy
meta-openstack-controller-deploy
meta-openstack-qemu

All openstack layers are maintained.

Quoted 11 lines

meta-opie
meta-oracle-java
meta-osmocombb
meta-ouya
meta-palm
meta-perl
meta-picosam9
meta-qt3
meta-qt5
meta-raspberrypi
meta-realtime

mantained

Quoted 15 lines

meta-ro-rootfs
meta-romley
meta-ros
meta-ruby
meta-samsung
meta-sdr
meta-security
meta-selinux
meta-shr
meta-shr-distro
meta-slugos
meta-smalltalk
meta-sourcery
meta-sugarbay
meta-sunxi

Quoted 8 lines

meta-sys940x
meta-systemd
meta-telephony
meta-telldus
meta-ti
meta-tlk
meta-tracing
meta-virtualization

maintained

But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list, since it is long and I scanned
it quickly.

Bruce

Quoted 29 lines

meta-web-kiosk
meta-webos
meta-webos-ports
meta-webserver
meta-woce
meta-x10
meta-xfce
meta-xilinx
meta-xilinx-community
meta-yassl
meta-yocto
meta-yocto-bsp
meta-zynq
meta-zynq-milo
openembedded-core
toolchain-layer

Thank you for your input, and best regards,
Trevor

[1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Signature · 6 lines

"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Quoted 10 lines · Mark Hatle

Quoted 9 lines · Bruce Ashfield

Quoted 6 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Quoted 5 lines

Quoted 3 lines

Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an
opt-in query ?

I agree.. see below for mine..

To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this way works too.

Interestingly enough, had I sorted the list on commit activity, according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/?s=idle
meta-realtime hasn't been touched in 10 months which would make me suspect it was abandoned.

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Quoted 4 lines · Bruce Ashfield

Quoted 2 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hi everyone,

Quoted 6 lines

Quoted 4 lines

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ?

Versus an

Quoted 1 line

opt-in query ?

Quoted 9 lines · Bruce Ashfield

Quoted 6 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Quoted 2 lines

Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ?

Some BSPs are valid for very long time without any commit in it. So I think it will show a lot of false-possitives.

Quoted 169 lines

Quoted 51 lines

meta-aarch64
meta-acer
meta-ada
meta-android
meta-angstrom
meta-arago-distro
meta-arago-extras
meta-asus
meta-aurora
meta-baryon
meta-beagleboard
meta-beagleboard-extras
meta-browser
meta-bug
meta-buglabs
meta-chicken
meta-chiefriver
meta-clutter
meta-crownbay
meta-crystalforest
meta-cubox
meta-darwin
meta-eca
meta-efikamx
meta-efl
meta-eldk
meta-emenlow
meta-erlang
meta-ettus
meta-filesystems
meta-fri2
meta-fsl-arm
meta-fsl-arm-extra
meta-fsl-demos
meta-fsl-ppc
meta-fso
meta-games
meta-geeksphone
meta-gir
meta-gnome
meta-gpe
meta-gstreamer10
meta-guacamayo
meta-gumstix
meta-gumstix-community
meta-gumstix-extras
meta-hamradio
meta-handheld
meta-hipos
meta-htc

Quoted 8 lines

meta-igep
meta-initramfs
meta-intel
meta-ivi
meta-jasperforest
meta-java
meta-kde
meta-kernel-dev

maintained.

Quoted 18 lines

meta-kirkwood
meta-linaro
meta-linaro-toolchain
meta-lsi
meta-lxcbench
meta-measured
meta-mentor
meta-micro
meta-mingw
meta-minnow
meta-mono
meta-multimedia
meta-n450
meta-netbookpro
meta-netmodule
meta-networking
meta-nokia
meta-nslu2

Quoted 8 lines

meta-nuc
meta-oe
meta-openmoko
meta-openpandora
meta-openstack
meta-openstack-compute-deploy
meta-openstack-controller-deploy
meta-openstack-qemu

All openstack layers are maintained.

Quoted 11 lines

meta-opie
meta-oracle-java
meta-osmocombb
meta-ouya
meta-palm
meta-perl
meta-picosam9
meta-qt3
meta-qt5
meta-raspberrypi
meta-realtime

mantained

Quoted 15 lines

meta-ro-rootfs
meta-romley
meta-ros
meta-ruby
meta-samsung
meta-sdr
meta-security
meta-selinux
meta-shr
meta-shr-distro
meta-slugos
meta-smalltalk
meta-sourcery
meta-sugarbay
meta-sunxi

Quoted 8 lines

meta-sys940x
meta-systemd
meta-telephony
meta-telldus
meta-ti
meta-tlk
meta-tracing
meta-virtualization

maintained

But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list, since it is long and I scanned
it quickly.

Bruce

Quoted 24 lines

meta-web-kiosk
meta-webos
meta-webos-ports
meta-webserver
meta-woce
meta-x10
meta-xfce
meta-xilinx
meta-xilinx-community
meta-yassl
meta-yocto
meta-yocto-bsp
meta-zynq
meta-zynq-milo
openembedded-core
toolchain-layer

Thank you for your input, and best regards,
Trevor

Quoted 5 lines

[1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Quoted 7 lines

--
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]

Quoted 14 lines · Mark Hatle

Quoted 12 lines · Bruce Ashfield

Quoted 6 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an
opt-in query ?

Quoted 1 line

I agree.. see below for mine..

To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this way works too.

Interestingly enough, had I sorted the list on commit activity, according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/?s=idle
meta-realtime hasn't been touched in 10 months which would make me suspect it was abandoned.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Quoted 15 lines · Trevor Woerner

Quoted 14 lines · Mark Hatle

Quoted 12 lines · Bruce Ashfield

Quoted 6 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an
opt-in query ?

Quoted 5 lines

Quoted 1 line

I agree.. see below for mine..

To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this way works too.

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-gumstix-community

meta-xfce

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Trevor Woerner
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:45 AM
To: openembedded-core
Subject: [OE-core] unmaintained layers

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-xilinx

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-aarch64

meta-acer
meta-ada
meta-android
meta-angstrom
meta-arago-distro
meta-arago-extras
meta-asus
meta-aurora
meta-baryon
meta-beagleboard
meta-beagleboard-extras
meta-browser
meta-bug
meta-buglabs
meta-chicken
meta-chiefriver
meta-clutter
meta-crownbay
meta-crystalforest
meta-cubox
meta-darwin
meta-eca
meta-efikamx
meta-efl
meta-eldk
meta-emenlow
meta-erlang
meta-ettus
meta-filesystems
meta-fri2
meta-fsl-arm
meta-fsl-arm-extra
meta-fsl-demos
meta-fsl-ppc
meta-fso
meta-games
meta-geeksphone
meta-gir
meta-gnome
meta-gpe
meta-gstreamer10
meta-guacamayo
meta-gumstix
meta-gumstix-community
meta-gumstix-extras
meta-hamradio
meta-handheld
meta-hipos
meta-htc
meta-igep
meta-initramfs
meta-intel
meta-ivi
meta-jasperforest
meta-java
meta-kde
meta-kernel-dev
meta-kirkwood

meta-linaro
meta-linaro-toolchain

meta-lsi
meta-lxcbench
meta-measured
meta-mentor
meta-micro
meta-mingw
meta-minnow
meta-mono
meta-multimedia
meta-n450
meta-netbookpro
meta-netmodule
meta-networking
meta-nokia
meta-nslu2
meta-nuc
meta-oe
meta-openmoko
meta-openpandora
meta-openstack
meta-openstack-compute-deploy
meta-openstack-controller-deploy
meta-openstack-qemu
meta-opie
meta-oracle-java
meta-osmocombb
meta-ouya
meta-palm
meta-perl
meta-picosam9
meta-qt3
meta-qt5
meta-raspberrypi
meta-realtime
meta-ro-rootfs
meta-romley
meta-ros
meta-ruby
meta-samsung
meta-sdr
meta-security
meta-selinux
meta-shr
meta-shr-distro
meta-slugos
meta-smalltalk
meta-sourcery
meta-sugarbay
meta-sunxi
meta-sys940x
meta-systemd
meta-telephony
meta-telldus
meta-ti
meta-tlk
meta-tracing
meta-virtualization
meta-web-kiosk
meta-webos
meta-webos-ports
meta-webserver
meta-woce
meta-x10
meta-xfce
meta-xilinx
meta-xilinx-community
meta-yassl
meta-yocto
meta-yocto-bsp
meta-zynq
meta-zynq-milo
openembedded-core
toolchain-layer

Thank you for your input, and best regards,
Trevor

[1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-filesystems

meta-perl

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-hipos

is maintained.

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

Quoted 4 lines

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers are maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem.

We have some immediate issues with patches to particular layers going unmerged. That's in the process of being resolved.

However, looking to the future it was suggested at the TSC meeting it would be nice to have some kind of measure or indication for the layer (ideally in the layer index) as to how well-maintained it is. Is there a practical and objective measurement we can have about the layer's maintenance status? I don't have a good idea of what this would actually mean - how many outstanding patches it has? How recently it has been built/tested?

This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers are maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem.

Also, if it does appear that a layer has gone "unmaintained" by popular consensus, what should actually be done about it?

Hi Paul,

Quoted 5 lines · Paul Eggleton

This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers are maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem.

Also, if it does appear that a layer has gone "unmaintained" by popular consensus, what should actually be done about it?

I was hoping I could put together a list of the layers which are no longer maintained to see if we could find people who might be interested in stepping up and taking on their maintenance. Or at the very least, clarifying a given layers' maintenance status.

At the last OE TSC meeting the issue of unmaintained layers was brought up, I asked several times if people could specify to which layers they were referring, but nobody replied. So people are concerned about layers that have no maintainer, but nobody can say which ones (?). In my opinion I thought it would be easier to solve this problem if we could at least start by defining it.

As to what can be done about it: if a layer is not maintained, and nobody cares for the layer, we should drop it from the list or at least mark it as such ("buyer beware"). If a layer is not maintained, and people do care, then we'll need to try to find someone to take responsibility for it (we should, at the very least, make the attempt). Also I think we should identify layers that people do care about, whose maintenance is questionable, which are not hosted in a way where the community can apply necessary patches to easily.

Best regards,
Trevor
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

BTW, I maintain meta-sdr.

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-baryon
meta-security
meta-web-kiosk

Thank you for your input, and best regards,
Trevor

[1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-aarch64
meta-acer
meta-ada
meta-android
meta-angstrom
meta-arago-distro
meta-arago-extras
meta-asus
meta-aurora
meta-baryon
meta-beagleboard
meta-beagleboard-extras
meta-browser
meta-bug
meta-buglabs
meta-chicken
meta-chiefriver
meta-clutter
meta-crownbay
meta-crystalforest
meta-cubox
meta-darwin
meta-eca
meta-efikamx
meta-efl
meta-eldk
meta-emenlow
meta-erlang
meta-ettus
meta-filesystems
meta-fri2
meta-fsl-arm
meta-fsl-arm-extra
meta-fsl-demos
meta-fsl-ppc
meta-fso
meta-games
meta-geeksphone
meta-gir
meta-gnome
meta-gpe
meta-gstreamer10
meta-guacamayo
meta-gumstix
meta-gumstix-community
meta-gumstix-extras
meta-hamradio
meta-handheld
meta-hipos
meta-htc
meta-igep
meta-initramfs
meta-intel
meta-ivi
meta-jasperforest
meta-java
meta-kde
meta-kernel-dev
meta-kirkwood
meta-linaro
meta-linaro-toolchain
meta-lsi
meta-lxcbench
meta-measured
meta-mentor
meta-micro
meta-mingw
meta-minnow
meta-mono
meta-multimedia
meta-n450
meta-netbookpro
meta-netmodule
meta-networking
meta-nokia
meta-nslu2
meta-nuc
meta-oe
meta-openmoko
meta-openpandora
meta-openstack
meta-openstack-compute-deploy
meta-openstack-controller-deploy
meta-openstack-qemu
meta-opie
meta-oracle-java

meta-osmocombb
meta-ouya
meta-palm
meta-perl
meta-picosam9
meta-qt3
meta-qt5
meta-raspberrypi

Hi everyone,

At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained?

meta-zynq-milo

Worse than unmaintained - this one was taken out of existence last Friday. I've already notified Paul Eggleton, so it should removed from the list soon.