drivers: tty: serial: xilinx_uartps: check related config macro before processing 'sysrq'
Subsystems (2)
Hello Maintainers:
Please help check this patch, when you have time, thanks.
And now I find it is already fixed, but I still feel it can be
improved: "add defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE)".
Thanks.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [PATCH] drivers: tty: serial: xilinx_uartps: check related config macro before processing 'sysrq'
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:21:49 +0800
From: Chen Gang <[email protected]>
To: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
CC: Greg KH <[email protected]>, James Hogan <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Need check CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE or SUPPORT_SYSRQ just like the structure definiation has done. Or may cause compiling issue.
The related error (with allmodconfig for metag):
CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.o
drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c: In function 'xuartps_isr':
drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c:247: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member named 'sysrq'
--- drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c +2 -1
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xuartps_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)* uart_handle_sysrq_char() doesn't work if * spinlocked, for some reason */ +#if defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE ) || defined(SUPPORT_SYSRQ )if (port->sysrq) {spin_unlock (&port->lock); if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(port,
@@ -253,7 +254,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xuartps_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) }spin_lock (&port->lock); } - +#endif port->icount.rx++;if (isrstatus &XUARTPS_IXR_PARITY ) {
Signature · 9 lines
1.7.7.6 Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share and attitude like air, water and life which God blessed
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Chen Gang
Hello Maintainers:
Please help check this patch, when you have time, thanks.
And now I find it is already fixed, but I still feel it can be
improved: "adddefined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE)".
What do you mean by this?
What can I do with this patch, it's not in a format I can apply it in, and you say it's not needed anymore, so I guess I'll just delete it :(
greg k-h
Quoted 10 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 6 lines · Chen Gang
Hello Maintainers:
Please help check this patch, when you have time, thanks.
And now I find it is already fixed, but I still feel it can be
improved: "adddefined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE)".What do you mean by this?
Excuse me, I did not say quite clear enough originally.
What I mean is:
------------------------patch begin---------------------------------
drivers: tty: serial: xilinx_uartps: add CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE switch macro
For structure member 'sysrq', the related header defines it when "#ifdefined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE) || defined(SUPPORT_SYSRQ)", so need add CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE for consistency.
The related patch is
"c2db11e tty: xuartps: Properly guard sysrq specific code"
--- drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c +1 -1
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xuartps_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)continue ; } -#ifdef SUPPORT_SYSRQ +#if defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE ) || defined(SUPPORT_SYSRQ )/* * uart_handle_sysrq_char() doesn't work if * spinlocked, for some reason
Signature · 3 lines
1.7.11.7 ------------------------patch end-------------------------------------
Quoted 5 lines
What can I do with this patch, it's not in a format I can apply it in, and you say it's not needed anymore, so I guess I'll just delete it :(
greg k-h
Thanks.
Signature · 3 lines
Chen Gang Open, share and attitude like air, water and life which God blessed