ext4 extent issue when page size > block size
Hi,
While running openldap unit tests on a ppc64 system, we have had issues with the cp command. cp uses the FS_IOC_FIEMAP ioctl to optimize the copy and it appeared that the ext4 extent list of the file did not match all the data which was 'written' on disk.
The system we use has a 64kB page size but the page size being greater than the filesystem block seems to be the top level reason of the problem. One can use a 1kB block size filesystem to reproduce the issue on a 4kB page size system.
Attached is a simple test case from Anton, which creates extents as follow :
lseek(48K -1) -> creates [11/1) p = mmap(128K) *(p) = 1 -> creates [0/1) with a fault lseek(128K) -> creates [31/1) *(p + 49K) = 1 -> creates [12/1) and then merges in [11/2) munmap(128K)
On a 4kB page size system, the extent list returned by FS_IOC_FIEMAP looks correct :
Extent 0: logical: 0 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x006 Extent 1: logical: 45056 physical: 0 length: 8192 flags 0x006 Extent 2: logical: 126976 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x007
But, with a 64kB page size, we miss the in-the-middle extent (no page fault but the data is on disk) :
Extent 0: logical: 0 physical: 0 length: 49152 flags 0x006 Extent 1: logical: 126976 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x007
This looks wrong. Right ? Or are we doing something wrong ? I have been digging in the ext4 page writeback code. There are some caveats when blocksize < pagesize but I am not sure my understanding is correct.
Many thanks,
C.
/*
* mmap vs extent issue
*
* Copyright (C) 2014 Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>, IBM *
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/fiemap.h>
static void check_fiemap(int fd)
{
struct fiemap *fiemap;
unsigned long i, ex_size;
fiemap = malloc(sizeof(struct fiemap));
if (!fiemap) {
perror("malloc");
exit(1);
}
memset(fiemap, 0, sizeof(struct fiemap));
fiemap->fm_length = ~0;
if (ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap) == -1) {
perror("ioctl(FIEMAP)");
exit(1);
}
ex_size = sizeof(struct fiemap_extent) * fiemap->fm_mapped_extents;
fiemap = realloc(fiemap, sizeof(struct fiemap) + ex_size);
if (!fiemap) {
perror("realloc");
exit(1);
}
memset(fiemap->fm_extents, 0, ex_size);
fiemap->fm_extent_count = fiemap->fm_mapped_extents;
fiemap->fm_mapped_extents = 0;
if (ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap) < 0) {
perror("ioctl(FIEMAP)");
exit(1);
}
for (i = 0; i < fiemap->fm_mapped_extents; i++) {
unsigned long start = fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_logical;
unsigned long end = fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_logical +
fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_length;
if (start <= 48*1024 && end > 48*1024) {
printf("GOOD\n");
exit(0);
}
}
printf("BAD:\n");
for (i = 0; i < fiemap->fm_mapped_extents; i++) {
printf("%ld:\t%016llx %016llx\n", i,
fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_logical,
fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_length);
}
exit(1);
}int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char name[] = "mmap-lseek-XXXXXX";
int fd;
char *p;
fd = mkstemp(name);
if (fd == -1) {
perror("mkstemp");
exit(1);
}
/* Create a 48 kB file */
lseek(fd, 48 * 1024 - 1, SEEK_SET);
if (write(fd, "\0", 1) != 1) {
perror("write");
exit(1);
}
/* Map it, allowing space for it to grow */
p = mmap(NULL, 128 * 1024, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
exit(1);
}
/* Write to the start of the file */
*(p) = 1;
/* Extend the file */
lseek(fd, 128 * 1024 - 1, SEEK_SET);
if (write(fd, "\0", 1) != 1) {
perror("write");
exit(1);
}
/* write to the new space in the first page */
*(p + 49 * 1024) = 1;
munmap(p, 128 * 1024);
check_fiemap(fd);
close(fd);
return 0;
}Hello,
Quoted 32 lines · Cedric Le Goater
While running openldap unit tests on a ppc64 system, we have had issues with the cp command. cp uses the
FS_IOC_FIEMAPioctl to optimize the copy and it appeared that the ext4 extent list of the file did not match all the data which was 'written' on disk.The system we use has a 64kB page size but the page size being greater than the filesystem block seems to be the top level reason of the problem. One can use a 1kB block size filesystem to reproduce the issue on a 4kB page size system.
Attached is a simple test case from Anton, which creates extents as follow :
lseek(48K -1) -> creates [11/1) p = mmap(128K) *(p) = 1 -> creates [0/1) with a fault lseek(128K) -> creates [31/1) *(p + 49K) = 1 -> creates [12/1) and then merges in [11/2) munmap(128K)On a 4kB page size system, the extent list returned by
FS_IOC_FIEMAPlooks correct :Extent 0: logical: 0 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x006 Extent 1: logical: 45056 physical: 0 length: 8192 flags 0x006 Extent 2: logical: 126976 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x007But, with a 64kB page size, we miss the in-the-middle extent (no page fault but the data is on disk) :
Quoted 7 lines
Extent 0: logical: 0 physical: 0 length: 49152 flags 0x006 Extent 1: logical: 126976 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x007This looks wrong. Right ? Or are we doing something wrong ? I have been digging in the ext4 page writeback code. There are some caveats when blocksize < pagesize but I am not sure my understanding is correct.
So you are completely right with the observation that in case like you
describe we don't create delayed allocation extent for the block just beyond EOF. This is a problem which exists since day one when delayed allocation was introduced for ext4 (but also xfs and I dare to say any other fs doing delayed allocation). The culprit really is that we create delayed allocation extents on page fault - at that time file is only 48KB so we naturally don't allocate blocks for blocks beyond those 48KB. However after extending the file, the part of the page at offsets beyond 48KB suddently becomes part of the file and if you write some data there (no page fault happens because the page is already marked writeable in the page tables), we won't have any delayed allocation extent backing that data.
One thing to note here is that posix specifically says that extending file while it is mmaped has undefined consequences for the mmap so technically speaking if we would just throw away the data, we would still adhere to it. I don't think we should be so harsh but I mention this to explain why some weirdness may be acceptable.
Anyway, fixing this isn't completely easy. I was looking into that some years ago and the best solution I've found back then was to writeprotect the last partial page whenever blocksize < pagesize, we are extending the file and creating hole in the last partial page beyond original EOF. This actually requires tweaking not only truncate path but also write path and the locking was somewhat hairy there because we need to writeprotect the tail page before updating i_size and make sure noone can fault it in again before the i_size is updated.
Honza
Quoted 127 lines
/*
* mmap vs extent issue
*
* Copyright (C) 2014 Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>, IBM *
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. */#include <
stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/fiemap.h>static void
check_fiemap(int fd){ struct fiemap *fiemap; unsigned long i, ex_size; fiemap = malloc(sizeof(struct fiemap)); if (!fiemap) { perror("malloc"); exit(1); } memset(fiemap, 0, sizeof(struct fiemap)); fiemap->fm_length = ~0; if (ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap) == -1) { perror("ioctl(FIEMAP)"); exit(1); } ex_size = sizeof(struct fiemap_extent) * fiemap->fm_mapped_extents; fiemap = realloc(fiemap, sizeof(struct fiemap) + ex_size); if (!fiemap) { perror("realloc"); exit(1); } memset(fiemap->fm_extents, 0, ex_size); fiemap->fm_extent_count = fiemap->fm_mapped_extents; fiemap->fm_mapped_extents = 0; if (ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap) < 0) { perror("ioctl(FIEMAP)"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < fiemap->fm_mapped_extents; i++) { unsigned long start = fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_logical; unsigned long end = fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_logical + fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_length; if (start <= 48*1024 && end > 48*1024) { printf("GOOD\n"); exit(0); } } printf("BAD:\n"); for (i = 0; i < fiemap->fm_mapped_extents; i++) { printf("%ld:\t%016llx %016llx\n", i, fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_logical, fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_length); } exit(1); }int
main(int argc, char *argv[]){ char name[] = "mmap-lseek-XXXXXX"; int fd; char *p; fd = mkstemp(name); if (fd == -1) { perror("mkstemp"); exit(1); } /* Create a 48 kB file */ lseek(fd, 48 * 1024 - 1, SEEK_SET); if (write(fd, "\0", 1) != 1) { perror("write"); exit(1); } /* Map it, allowing space for it to grow */ p = mmap(NULL, 128 * 1024, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); if (p == MAP_FAILED) { perror("mmap"); exit(1); } /* Write to the start of the file */ *(p) = 1; /* Extend the file */ lseek(fd, 128 * 1024 - 1, SEEK_SET); if (write(fd, "\0", 1) != 1) { perror("write"); exit(1); } /* write to the new space in the first page */ *(p + 49 * 1024) = 1; munmap(p, 128 * 1024); check_fiemap(fd); close(fd); return 0; }
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Quoted 22 lines · Jan Kara
Hello,
Quoted 19 lines · Cedric Le Goater
While running openldap unit tests on a ppc64 system, we have had issues with the cp command. cp uses the
FS_IOC_FIEMAPioctl to optimize the copy and it appeared that the ext4 extent list of the file did not match all the data which was 'written' on disk.The system we use has a 64kB page size but the page size being greater than the filesystem block seems to be the top level reason of the problem. One can use a 1kB block size filesystem to reproduce the issue on a 4kB page size system.
Attached is a simple test case from Anton, which creates extents as follow :
lseek(48K -1) -> creates [11/1) p = mmap(128K) *(p) = 1 -> creates [0/1) with a fault lseek(128K) -> creates [31/1) *(p + 49K) = 1 -> creates [12/1) and then merges in [11/2) munmap(128K)
This shoul dbe easy to reproduce on a 4k page size machine using 512 byte block size. Yup, it is.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
On a 4kB page size system, the extent list returned by
FS_IOC_FIEMAPlooks correct :Extent 0: logical: 0 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x006 Extent 1: logical: 45056 physical: 0 length: 8192 flags 0x006 Extent 2: logical: 126976 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x007
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
But, with a 64kB page size, we miss the in-the-middle extent (no page fault but the data is on disk) :
Extent 0: logical: 0 physical: 0 length: 49152 flags 0x006 Extent 1: logical: 126976 physical: 0 length: 4096 flags 0x007
Pretty much the same:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..3]: 11..14 0 (11..14) 4 00000 1: [4..14]: hole 11 2: [15..15]: 15..15 0 (15..15) 1 00000
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
This looks wrong. Right ? Or are we doing something wrong ? I have been digging in the ext4 page writeback code. There are some caveats when blocksize < pagesize but I am not sure my understanding is correct.
So you are completely right with the observation that in case like you
describe we don't create delayed allocation extent for the block just beyond EOF. This is a problem which exists since day one when delayed allocation was introduced for ext4 (but also xfs and I dare to say any other fs doing delayed allocation).
The above was done on XFS, because ext4 doesn't support 512 byte block sizes.
Quoted 7 lines
delayed allocation extents on page fault - at that time file is only 48KB so we naturally don't allocate blocks for blocks beyond those 48KB. However after extending the file, the part of the page at offsets beyond 48KB suddently becomes part of the file and if you write some data there (no page fault happens because the page is already marked writeable in the page tables), we won't have any delayed allocation extent backing that data.
Quoted 5 lines
One thing to note here is that posix specifically says that extending file while it is mmaped has undefined consequences for the mmap so technically speaking if we would just throw away the data, we would still adhere to it. I don't think we should be so harsh but I mention this to explain why some weirdness may be acceptable.
Right - if you touch the mmap()d range beyond EOF before the file is extended, we segv the application. So, really, it's just a bad idea to do this.
Quoted 8 lines
Anyway, fixing this isn't completely easy. I was looking into that some years ago and the best solution I've found back then was to writeprotect the last partial page whenever blocksize < pagesize, we are extending the file and creating hole in the last partial page beyond original EOF. This actually requires tweaking not only truncate path but also write path and the locking was somewhat hairy there because we need to writeprotect the tail page before updating
i_sizeand make sure noone can fault it in again before thei_sizeis updated.
It's just another "we can't synchronise page faults against IO" problem, just like we have with hole punching. The way we've optimised truncate by using page locks and isize and mapping checks is fine for simple cases where EOF isn't changing, but the moment we need isize update vs page fault serialisation, or IO vs page-fault-inside-EOF serialisation, we're screwed.
The whole concept that page faults are immune to/exempted from filesystem IO serialisation requirements is fundamentally broken. Until we fix that we're not going to be able to solve these nasty corner cases.
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected]