linux-next: ahci_platform broken build
Hi,
Quoted 26 lines · Tim Gardner
Gents - while reviewing some patches for arm64 in Ubuntu I noticed that there is at least one patch sequence in linux-next that breaks the build.
156c5887948cd191417f18026aab9ce26e5a95daahci-platform: Add support for devices with more then 1 clock039ece38da45f5e6a94be3aa7611cf3634bc2461libahci: Allow drivers to overridestart_engineFor example:
git reset --hard
156c5887948cd191417f18026aab9ce26e5a95daecho "CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM=y" >> .config make oldconfig scripts prepare
make M=drivers/ataWARNING: Symbol version dump
/home/rtg/linux/linux-next/Module.symvers
is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions.CC drivers/ata/libata-core.o CC drivers/ata/libata-scsi.o CC drivers/ata/libata-eh.o CC drivers/ata/libata-transport.o CC drivers/ata/libata-sff.o CC drivers/ata/libata-pmp.o CC drivers/ata/libata-acpi.o LD drivers/ata/libata.o CC drivers/ata/ahci.o CC drivers/ata/libahci.o CC drivers/ata/ahci_platform.o
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c: In function ‘ahci_probe’:drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c:209:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ahci_enable_clks’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c:293:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ahci_disable_clks’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [drivers/ata/ahci_platform.o] Error 1
make: *** [_module_drivers/ata] Error 2The compile problem is then fixed in
96a01ba52c60fdd74dd6e8cf06645d06515b1396(ahci-platform: Addenable_/disable_resourceshelper functions) which is not really kosher.
Ah good catch, at some point I decided to prefix all the ahci_* functions defined in ahci_platform.c with ahci_platform_ instead of just ahci_. Somehow the functions got added with their new names directly in the "ahci-platform: Add support for devices with more then 1 clock" patch (this is intentional), but the calls added in that patch kept using the old names. Then in the "ahci-platform: Add enable_ / disable_resources helper functions" patch
the calls get moved to another place and now show up with the proper ahci_platform_* names. My bad.
Tejun it is probably easiest if you fix this up directly in your tree, let me know if you want a fixed up resend of the 2 patches in question instead.
Regards,
Hans
Gents - while reviewing some patches for arm64 in Ubuntu I noticed that there is at least one patch sequence in linux-next that breaks the build.
156c5887948cd191417f18026aab9ce26e5a95da ahci-platform: Add support for devices with more then 1 clock 039ece38da45f5e6a94be3aa7611cf3634bc2461 libahci: Allow drivers to override start_engine
For example:
git reset --hard 156c5887948cd191417f18026aab9ce26e5a95da echo "CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM=y" >> .config make oldconfig scripts prepare
make M=drivers/ata
WARNING: Symbol version dump /home/rtg/linux/linux-next/Module.symvers
is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions.
CC drivers/ata/libata-core.o CC drivers/ata/libata-scsi.o CC drivers/ata/libata-eh.o CC drivers/ata/libata-transport.o CC drivers/ata/libata-sff.o CC drivers/ata/libata-pmp.o CC drivers/ata/libata-acpi.o LD drivers/ata/libata.o CC drivers/ata/ahci.o CC drivers/ata/libahci.o CC drivers/ata/ahci_platform.o
drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c: In function ‘ahci_probe’:drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c:209:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ahci_enable_clks’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c:293:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ahci_disable_clks’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [drivers/ata/ahci_platform.o] Error 1
make: *** [_module_drivers/ata] Error 2
The compile problem is then fixed in 96a01ba52c60fdd74dd6e8cf06645d06515b1396 (ahci-platform: Add enable_ / disable_resources helper functions) which is not really kosher.
It seems like you ought to fix this before the 3.15 merge window opens.
rtg
Signature · 1 line
Tim Gardner [email protected]
Quoted 2 lines · Hans de Goede
Tejun it is probably easiest if you fix this up directly in your tree, let me know if you want a fixed up resend of the 2 patches in question instead.
It already happened and got resolved in the span of few patches. Shit happens. Let's just try to test each step better next time.
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
tejun