general discussion, DT (fragments?) and TrustZone
Hi,
I am Atmel AT91 Co-Maintainer and would like to attend the ARM Linux mini-summit or BoF. I will be attending ELC as well.
I'd love to discuss the following topics with you guys:
- current effort toward AT91 DT conversion, where do we stand, what are the future plans and what are the best ways to move old platforms to DT-only
- integration of AT91 to ARM multiplatform initiative. Following our adoption of CCF, I would like to summarize what is remaining to be done before integrating the multiplatform single zImage kernel
- best DT practices for handling little differences in hardware platforms:
- subtle HW changes in relation to board revisions
- addition of daughter boards, modules, capes, shields
- use of DT fragments: status, best practices, location of DT fragments
Without a proper mechanism we quickly observe a huge amount of different .dtsi/.dts files popping up!
- TrustZone and the Linaro Open Source Trusted Execution Environment:
how ARM Linux will interact with this initiative and which part of the Linux kernel would implement the calls to the TEE API.
Thanks, bye.
Signature · 1 line
Nicolas Ferre