xfs_repair: copy, don't clear, stripe geometry in backup SB
PATCH 1/1 xfs_repair: copy, don't clear, stripe geometry in backup SB
Today, if we have a filesystem with stripe geometry and a damaged primary superblock, we will zero out stripe geometry if we have copied the backup.
I'm guessing this might be because changing geometry with mount options only updates the primary, so backups aren't guaranteed to be current or correct.
Unfortunately, that leaves us with sb 0 w/ no geom, and backups *with* geom, so the next repair finds the mismatch, and complains. (In other words, the 2nd repair does not come up clean.)_ And ... the second repair copies the backup stripe geometry back into the primary!
Rather than clearing stripe geometry in this case, just leave it at what was found in the backup super, and inform the user that this was done. This leaves a consistent filesystem, and gives the user a heads-up to double-check the result.
This can all be demonstrated and tested by running xfs/030 with geometry set in MKFS_OPTIONS. (To really make the test pass, we need to filter the warning out of repair output.)
---
repair/globals.h +1 -1
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ EXTERN int lazy_count; /* What to set if to if converting */ EXTERN int primary_sb_modified; EXTERN int bad_ino_btree; -EXTERN int clear_sunit; +EXTERN int copied_sunit; EXTERN int fs_is_dirty;/* for hunting down the root inode */
repair/sb.c +1 -1
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ find_secondary_sb(xfs_sb_t *rsb)*/ memmove (rsb, &bufsb,sizeof (xfs_sb_t)); rsb->sb_inprogress =0 ; - clear_sunit =1 ; + copied_sunit =1 ;if (verify_set_primary_sb (rsb,0 , &dirty) ==XR_OK ) { do_warn(
repair/xfs_repair.c +4 -6
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ process_args(int argc, char **argv) delete_attr_ok =1 ; force_geo =0 ; assume_xfs =0 ; - clear_sunit =0 ; + copied_sunit =0 ; sb_inoalignmt =0 ; sb_unit =0 ; sb_width =0 ;
@@ -898,13 +898,11 @@ _("Warning: project quota information would be cleared.\n" dsb->sb_qflags &=cpu_to_be16 (~XFS_ALL_QUOTA_CHKD ); } -if (clear_sunit) { +if (copied_sunit) {do_warn ( -_ ("Note - stripe unit (%d) and width (%d) fields have been reset.\n" -"Please set with mount -o sunit=<value>,swidth=<value>\n" ), +_ ("Note - stripe unit (%d) and width (%d) were copied from a backup superblock.\n" +"Please reset with mount -o sunit=<value>,swidth=<value> if necessary\n" ),be32_to_cpu (dsb->sb_unit),be32_to_cpu (dsb->sb_width)); - dsb->sb_unit =0 ; - dsb->sb_width =0 ; }libxfs_writebuf (sbp,0 );
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 19 lines · Eric Sandeen
Today, if we have a filesystem with stripe geometry and a damaged primary superblock, we will zero out stripe geometry if we have copied the backup.
I'm guessing this might be because changing geometry with mount options only updates the primary, so backups aren't guaranteed to be current or correct.
Unfortunately, that leaves us with sb 0 w/ no geom, and backups *with* geom, so the next repair finds the mismatch, and complains. (In other words, the 2nd repair does not come up clean.)_ And ... the second repair copies the backup stripe geometry back into the primary!
Rather than clearing stripe geometry in this case, just leave it at what was found in the backup super, and inform the user that this was done. This leaves a consistent filesystem, and gives the user a heads-up to double-check the result.
Quoted 6 lines
This can all be demonstrated and tested by running xfs/030 with geometry set in
MKFS_OPTIONS. (To really make the test pass, we need to filter the warning out of repair output.)Signed-off-by Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>---
Seems reasonable to me.
Quoted 58 lines
repair/globals.h +1
-1@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ EXTERN int lazy_count; /* What to set if to if converting */ EXTERN int primary_sb_modified; EXTERN int bad_ino_btree; -EXTERN int clear_sunit; +EXTERN int copied_sunit; EXTERN int fs_is_dirty;/* for hunting down the root inode */ repair/sb.c +1
-1@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ find_secondary_sb(xfs_sb_t *rsb)*/ memmove (rsb, &bufsb,sizeof (xfs_sb_t)); rsb->sb_inprogress =0 ; - clear_sunit =1 ; + copied_sunit =1 ;if (verify_set_primary_sb (rsb,0 , &dirty) ==XR_OK ) { do_warn(repair/xfs_repair.c +4
-6@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ process_args(int argc, char **argv) delete_attr_ok =1 ; force_geo =0 ; assume_xfs =0 ; - clear_sunit =0 ; + copied_sunit =0 ; sb_inoalignmt =0 ; sb_unit =0 ; sb_width =0 ;@@ -898,13 +898,11 @@ _("Warning: project quota information would be cleared.\n" dsb->sb_qflags &=cpu_to_be16 (~XFS_ALL_QUOTA_CHKD ); } -if (clear_sunit) { +if (copied_sunit) {do_warn ( -_ ("Note - stripe unit (%d) and width (%d) fields have been reset.\n" -"Please set with mount -o sunit=<value>,swidth=<value>\n" ), +_ ("Note - stripe unit (%d) and width (%d) were copied from a backup superblock.\n" +"Please reset with mount -o sunit=<value>,swidth=<value> if necessary\n" ),be32_to_cpu (dsb->sb_unit),be32_to_cpu (dsb->sb_width)); - dsb->sb_unit =0 ; - dsb->sb_width =0 ; }libxfs_writebuf (sbp,0 );
Quoted 4 lines
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 14 lines · Eric Sandeen
Today, if we have a filesystem with stripe geometry and a damaged primary superblock, we will zero out stripe geometry if we have copied the backup.
I'm guessing this might be because changing geometry with mount options only updates the primary, so backups aren't guaranteed to be current or correct.
Unfortunately, that leaves us with sb 0 w/ no geom, and backups *with* geom, so the next repair finds the mismatch, and complains. (In other words, the 2nd repair does not come up clean.)_ And ... the second repair copies the backup stripe geometry back into the primary!
Quoted 8 lines
Rather than clearing stripe geometry in this case, just leave it at what was found in the backup super, and inform the user that this was done. This leaves a consistent filesystem, and gives the user a heads-up to double-check the result.
This can all be demonstrated and tested by running xfs/030 with geometry set in
MKFS_OPTIONS. (To really make the test pass, we need to filter the warning out of repair output.)
There are a few other tests that also fail due to this. Can you please send an updated filter patch to [email protected]?
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 7 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected] _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs