Skip to contentSkip to conversation

SCTP Quick failover status

DISCUSSION Vlad Yasevich 2 participants 2 messages Jul 22, 2014 – Jul 23, 2014 SCTP protocol

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Karen E. Egede Nielsen

Hi Vlad,

Would it possibly be feasible for you to provide feedback on as to whether:

* Linux SCTP supports the most recent version of the SCTP PF draft,
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover/, ?

It appears that Linux partially supports the latest draft. Some of the newer language in section 4.1 is not supported. The API doesn't appear to be supported either.

We'll work on adding this functionality.

Quoted 4 lines

* The Linux SCTP implementers group have any comments to the draft in question ?

I do not. I've cc'd the implementers mailing list to see if anyone else has any comments.

Thanks
-vlad

Quoted 29 lines

The draft is proposed for publication as Proposed Standard[*] by tsvwg. The check up towards potential comments from Linux SCTP
was a request made by the chairs at the tsvwg at IETF90.

Many thanks in advance !

BR, Karen

[* Even if present version says Experimental]

PS. As you can see Michael kindly provided you as a good reference.. :-)

Quoted 10 lines

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Tuexen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 22. juli 2014 15:52
To: Karen E. Egede Nielsen
Cc: Vlad Yasevich
Subject: SCTP Quick failover status

Hi Karen,

Vlad, who is the Linux SCTP kernel maintainer, might be able to comment

on

Quoted 1 line

the status of the Linux implementation if quick failover and if there

were any

Quoted 4 lines

comments related to the ID.

Best regards
Michael

#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Vlad Yasevich
Quoted 5 lines · Karen E. Egede Nielsen

Hi Vlad,

Would it possibly be feasible for you to provide feedback on as to whether:

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines

* Linux SCTP supports the most recent version of the SCTP PF draft,
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover/, ?

It appears that Linux partially supports the latest draft. Some of the newer language in section 4.1 is not supported. The API doesn't appear to be supported either.

We'll work on adding this functionality.

Looks like items 6 and 7 are missing from the list, as well as the socket api bits. I'll try get to this in the next week or so.
Neil