dfu: some wrong usb_qualifier_descriptor settings?
Hello Lukasz,
In the dfu spez [1] chapter 4.2.1 the following fields are specified:
bDeviceClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in U-Boot to 2.
bDeviceSubClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in U-Boot to 2.
bcdUSB = xxxxh (Description: USB specification release number in binary coded decimal -> 0110h) Currently set to 0x200
If I look in ./drivers/usb/gadget/f_dfu.c:
static const struct usb_qualifier_descriptor dev_qualifier = {
.bLength = sizeof dev_qualifier,
.bDescriptorType = USB_DT_DEVICE_QUALIFIER,
.bcdUSB = __constant_cpu_to_le16(0x0200),
.bDeviceClass = USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC,
.bNumConfigurations = 1,};
bDeviceClass = USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC = 0xff ?
Hmm... why states the doc this should be set to 0 = USB_CLASS_PER_INTERFACE? 2 is USB_CLASS_COMM ... which seems more appropriate ...
bDeviceSubClass is not defined ...
bcdUSB = 0x0200 which should be 0x0110 ... oh, as [1] is the dfu 1.1 specification it should be 0x0110 but the spec [1] says 0100 ... is the spec here buggy? is there a dfu 2.0 specification availiable?
Has this differences to the spec some reason? Or can we change them to the values specified in the spec?
Thanks!
bye,
Heiko
[1]: http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/DFU_1.1.pdf
Signature · 2 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Hi Heiko,
Quoted 21 lines
Hello Lukasz,
In the dfu spez [1] chapter 4.2.1 the following fields are specified:
bDeviceClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in U-Boot to 2.
bDeviceSubClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in U-Boot to 2.
bcdUSB = xxxxh (Description: USB specification release number in binary coded decimal -> 0110h) Currently set to
0x200If I look in
./drivers/usb/gadget/f_dfu.c:static const struct
usb_qualifier_descriptordev_qualifier= {.bLength = sizeof dev_qualifier, .bDescriptorType = USB_DT_DEVICE_QUALIFIER, .bcdUSB = __constant_cpu_to_le16(0x0200), .bDeviceClass = USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC, .bNumConfigurations = 1,
Quoted 7 lines
};
bDeviceClass =
USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC=0xff?Hmm... why states the doc this should be set to 0 =
USB_CLASS_PER_INTERFACE? 2 isUSB_CLASS_COMM... which seems more appropriate ...
The bDeviceClass seems to be set to wrong value. I think that it should have values as they are specified by the standard.
Quoted 5 lines
bDeviceSubClass is not defined ...
bcdUSB =0x0200which should be0x0110... oh, as [1] is the dfu 1.1 specification it should be0x0110but the spec [1] says 0100 ... is the spec here buggy? is there a dfu 2.0 specification availiable?
The 2.0 value is a reminiscent of the original DFU code (once prepared for Linux) and was wrongly set to indicate USB 2.0.
I think that we should have 0x0110, which indicates supported DFU version 1.1.
Quoted 3 lines
Has this differences to the spec some reason? Or can we change them to the values specified in the spec?
I think that values which you have pointed out are wrong and should be changed to the one from spec.
Quoted 7 lines
Thanks!
bye,
Heiko[1]: http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/DFU_1.1.pdf
Signature · 5 lines
Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
Hello Lukasz,
Am 22.08.2014 14:11, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
Quoted 47 lines
Hi Heiko,
Quoted 21 lines
Hello Lukasz,
In the dfu spez [1] chapter 4.2.1 the following fields are specified:
bDeviceClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in U-Boot to 2.
bDeviceSubClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in U-Boot to 2.
bcdUSB = xxxxh (Description: USB specification release number in binary coded decimal -> 0110h) Currently set to
0x200If I look in
./drivers/usb/gadget/f_dfu.c:static const struct
usb_qualifier_descriptordev_qualifier= {.bLength = sizeof dev_qualifier, .bDescriptorType = USB_DT_DEVICE_QUALIFIER, .bcdUSB = __constant_cpu_to_le16(0x0200), .bDeviceClass = USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC, .bNumConfigurations = 1,Quoted 7 lines
};
bDeviceClass =
USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC=0xff?Hmm... why states the doc this should be set to 0 =
USB_CLASS_PER_INTERFACE? 2 isUSB_CLASS_COMM... which seems more appropriate ...The bDeviceClass seems to be set to wrong value. I think that it should have values as they are specified by the standard.
Quoted 5 lines
bDeviceSubClass is not defined ...
bcdUSB =0x0200which should be0x0110... oh, as [1] is the dfu 1.1 specification it should be0x0110but the spec [1] says 0100 ... is the spec here buggy? is there a dfu 2.0 specification availiable?The 2.0 value is a reminiscent of the original DFU code (once prepared for Linux) and was wrongly set to indicate USB 2.0.
I think that we should have
0x0110, which indicates supported DFU version 1.1.Quoted 1 line
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Has this differences to the spec some reason? Or can we change them to the values specified in the spec?
I think that values which you have pointed out are wrong and should be changed to the one from spec.
Thanks! Changed. I send a patch soon.
bye,
Heiko
Signature · 2 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany