Device Tree Child Node Parsing Question
Hi,
What is the best way to queue devicetree child nodes so the node is passed in the platform_device pointer to the probe() function?
Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt has the following:
"For Linux DT support, the generic behaviour is for child devices to be registered by the parent's device driver at driver .probe() time."
"Actually, it turns out that registering children of some platform_devices as more platform_devices is a common pattern, and the device tree support code reflects that and makes the above example
simpler. The second argument to of_platform_populate() is anof_device_id table, and any node that matches an entry in that table
will also get its child nodes registered."
I tried calling of_platform_populate() in the probe of the a10_sysctl node but it doesn't appear to setup the platform device data properly for the sub-child nodes.
The top child node (a10_sysctl) is probed properly and has a valid of_node passed in. However, the sub-child nodes such as gpio4 have null passed in for pdev->dev.of_node (gpio4 probe prototype is int a10sycon_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev).
My current solution is to call of_find_matching_node() in a10sycon_gpio_probe() to get a valid node pointer but other examples tend to dereference pdev->dev.of_node.
Thank you in advance for your insight.
Thor
My device tree looks like this:
/ {
soc {
spi0: spi@fff00000 {
compatible = "snps,dw-spi-mmio";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
reg = <0xfff00000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <0 154 4>;
num-chipselect = <4>;
clocks = <&per_base_clk>;
status = "okay";
a10_sysctl: a10_sysctl@0 {
compatible = "altr,a10sycon";
reg = <0>;
interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
/* low-level active IRQ at GPIO2_24 */
interrupts = <24 0x8>;
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
spi-max-frequency = <100000>;
gpio4: gpio-controller {
compatible = "altr,a10sycon-gpio";
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
ngpios = <16>;
};
a10rst: a10rst {
compatible = "altr,a10sycon-reset";
#reset-cells = <1>;
};
};
};--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 549999A7.2010608-yzvPICuk2ABMcg4IHK0kFoH6Mc4MB0Vx@public.gmane.org
Quoted 27 lines · Thor Thayer
Hi,
What is the best way to queue devicetree child nodes so the node is passed in the
platform_devicepointer to theprobe()function?
Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txthas the following:"For Linux DT support, the generic behaviour is for child devices to be registered by the parent's device driver at driver .probe() time."
"Actually, it turns out that registering children of some
platform_devicesas moreplatform_devicesis a common pattern, and the
device tree support code reflects that and makes the above example simpler. The second argument toof_platform_populate()is anof_device_idtable, and any node that matches an entry in that table will also get its child nodes registered."I tried calling
of_platform_populate()in the probe of thea10_sysctlnode but it doesn't appear to setup the platform device data properly for the sub-child nodes.The top child node (
a10_sysctl) is probed properly and has a validof_nodepassed in. However, the sub-child nodes such as gpio4 have null passed in forpdev->dev.of_node(gpio4 probe prototype is inta10sycon_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev).
Quoted 5 lines
My current solution is to call
of_find_matching_node()ina10sycon_gpio_probe()to get a valid node pointer but other examples tend to dereferencepdev->dev.of_node.Thank you in advance for your insight.
This should work. There are quite a few users already including unit tests. Can you tell what you are doing differently from those users?
Rob
Quoted 33 lines
Thor
My device tree looks like this:
/ { soc { spi0: spi@fff00000 { compatible = "snps,dw-spi-mmio"; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; reg = <0xfff00000 0x1000>; interrupts = <0 154 4>; num-chipselect = <4>; clocks = <&per_base_clk>; status = "okay"; a10_sysctl: a10_sysctl@0 { compatible = "altr,a10sycon"; reg = <0>; interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>; /* low-level active IRQ at GPIO2_24 */ interrupts = <24 0x8>; interrupt-controller; #interrupt-cells = <2>; spi-max-frequency = <100000>; gpio4: gpio-controller { compatible = "altr,a10sycon-gpio"; gpio-controller; #gpio-cells = <2>; ngpios = <16>;
Quoted 8 lines
};
a10rst: a10rst {
compatible = "altr,a10sycon-reset";
#reset-cells = <1>;
};
};
};--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CAL_JsqLzbEuQgNZoBbzr4R=Nj9_Qs=60uLhzENbZzTaaTgxnZg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Quoted 24 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 22 lines · Thor Thayer
Hi,
What is the best way to queue devicetree child nodes so the node is passed in the
platform_devicepointer to theprobe()function?
Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txthas the following:"For Linux DT support, the generic behaviour is for child devices to be registered by the parent's device driver at driver .probe() time."
"Actually, it turns out that registering children of some
platform_devicesas moreplatform_devicesis a common pattern, and the
device tree support code reflects that and makes the above example simpler. The second argument toof_platform_populate()is anof_device_idtable, and any node that matches an entry in that table will also get its child nodes registered."I tried calling
of_platform_populate()in the probe of thea10_sysctlnode but it doesn't appear to setup the platform device data properly for the sub-child nodes.
<snip>
Quoted 7 lines
This should work. There are quite a few users already including unit tests. Can you tell what you are doing differently from those users?
Rob
Quoted 1 line
<snip>
Just to tie up this conversation in case anyone else has an issue, it ended up being my debug issue. The of_platform_populate() was working properly. The issue was that I was also calling a mfd_add_devices() using a devices table and I was watching the mfd_add_devices() probe. Simply removing the mfd_add_devices() and the table and using of_platform_populate() as below worked.
of_platform_populate(spi->dev.of_node, a10sycon_spi_of_match,
NULL, &spi->dev);
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 15 lines · Thor Thayer
Hi,
What is the best way to queue devicetree child nodes so the node is passed in the
platform_devicepointer to theprobe()function?
Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txthas the following:"For Linux DT support, the generic behaviour is for child devices to be registered by the parent's device driver at driver .probe() time."
"Actually, it turns out that registering children of some
platform_devicesas moreplatform_devicesis a common pattern, and the device tree support code reflects that and makes the above example
simpler. The second argument toof_platform_populate()is anof_device_idtable, and any node that matches an entry in that table
will also get its child nodes registered."
Quoted 3 lines
I tried calling
of_platform_populate()in the probe of thea10_sysctlnode but it doesn't appear to setup the platform device data properly for the sub-child nodes.The top child node (
a10_sysctl) is probed properly and has a validof_nodepassed in. However, the sub-child nodes such as gpio4 have null passed in forpdev->dev.of_node(gpio4 probe prototype is inta10sycon_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev).
Gpio4 is the child node of a10_sysctl? You call of_platform_populate() in the probe of the a10_sysctl node, this action does no matter with gpio4.
Yours,
Yunlei
Quoted 45 lines
My current solution is to call
of_find_matching_node()ina10sycon_gpio_probe()to get a valid node pointer but other examples tend to dereferencepdev->dev.of_node.Thank you in advance for your insight.
Thor
My device tree looks like this:
/ { soc { spi0: spi@fff00000 { compatible = "snps,dw-spi-mmio"; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; reg = <0xfff00000 0x1000>; interrupts = <0 154 4>; num-chipselect = <4>; clocks = <&per_base_clk>; status = "okay"; a10_sysctl: a10_sysctl@0 { compatible = "altr,a10sycon"; reg = <0>; interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>; /* low-level active IRQ at GPIO2_24 */ interrupts = <24 0x8>; interrupt-controller; #interrupt-cells = <2>; spi-max-frequency = <100000>; gpio4: gpio-controller { compatible = "altr,a10sycon-gpio"; gpio-controller; #gpio-cells = <2>; ngpios = <16>; }; a10rst: a10rst { compatible = "altr,a10sycon-reset"; #reset-cells = <1>; }; }; };
Quoted 6 lines
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html