Skip to contentSkip to conversation

man-pages MT attributes status / update

DISCUSSION Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) 2 participants 3 messages Jan 16, 2015 – Jan 19, 2015 2 messages not in the archive Man-pages: manual pages for Linux -- Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello Ma Shimiao

Now that you have started sending patches that bring the man-pages and glibc MT-safety into agreement, I think we'll soon be ready to release a lot of pent up patches (~350!) into a mainline man-pages release. My thanks to you and you colleagues at Fujitsu for all of this work!

I imagine that there are still some remaining differences between the man-pages and glibc MT-safety markings. Do you have an idea of how many pages remain to be fixed?

By the way, as far as I can tell, we now have all man-pages attributes markings in the "new look" boxed format. Can you confirm?

With all of the preceding in mind, I've done a bit of Git reorganization. I've removed the 'attributes_reformat_2' branch at http://git.kernel.org/cgit/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git . In its place, there is now a new branch 'mt_attributes'. I made that change for a couple of reasons:

1. I rebased the changes in the attributes_reformat' branch against man-pages-3.77. In the process, I resolved a handful of conflicts, and as a result of the rebase the SHA-1 IDs changed.

2. Into 'mt_attributes', I have merged all of the other MT-safety patches that were in a private branch that I was running. These were the patches in the last few months that added ATTRIBUTES to pages that did not have them.

I hope that switching to the new branch does not present any inconvenience to you. Of course, with this change, now the 'mt_attributes' branch shows all of the patches from you and your colleagues that I have merged. With luck, the view in that branch should be completely consistent with your local copy.

Cheers,

Michael

Signature · 7 lines
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#2 lore raw

Hello Michael

Quoted 6 lines · Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Hello Ma Shimiao

Now that you have started sending patches that bring the man-pages and glibc MT-safety into agreement, I think we'll soon be ready to release a lot of pent up patches (~350!) into a mainline man-pages release. My thanks

That's a good news!

Quoted 2 lines

to you and you colleagues at Fujitsu for all of this work!

You're welcome.

Quoted 4 lines

I imagine that there are still some remaining differences between the man-pages and glibc MT-safety markings. Do you have an idea of how many pages remain to be fixed?

I think there are still 24 pages need to be fixed. I hope I can finish them in this week.

Quoted 4 lines

By the way, as far as I can tell, we now have all man-pages attributes markings in the "new look" boxed format. Can you confirm?

There is a page man3/iconv.3 which is still not in the "new look". Peng has sent a patch to fix it at 10/14/2014 03:39 PM, but the patch has not been applied.

Quoted 12 lines

With all of the preceding in mind, I've done a bit of Git reorganization. I've removed the 'attributes_reformat_2' branch at http://git.kernel.org/cgit/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git . In its place, there is now a new branch 'mt_attributes'. I made that change for a couple of reasons:

1. I rebased the changes in the attributes_reformat' branch against man-pages-3.77. In the process, I resolved a handful of conflicts, and as a result of the rebase the SHA-1 IDs changed.

Quoted 7 lines

2. Into 'mt_attributes', I have merged all of the other MT-safety patches that were in a private branch that I was running. These were the patches in the last few months that added ATTRIBUTES to pages that did not have them.

I hope that switching to the new branch does not present any inconvenience to you. Of course, with this change, now

No, it doesn't.

Best regards

Quoted 10 lines

the 'mt_attributes' branch shows all of the patches from you and your colleagues that I have merged. With luck, the view in that branch should be completely consistent with your local copy.

Cheers,

Michael

Signature · 7 lines
Ma Shimiao
Development Dept.I
Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#4 lore raw

Hello Ma Shimiao

Quoted 3 lines · Ma Shimiao

Hello Michael

On 01/16/2015 04:35 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:

[...]

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

I imagine that there are still some remaining differences between the man-pages and glibc MT-safety markings. Do you have an idea of how many pages remain to be fixed?

I think there are still 24 pages need to be fixed. I hope I can finish them in this week.

Great!

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

By the way, as far as I can tell, we now have all man-pages attributes markings in the "new look" boxed format. Can you confirm?

There is a page man3/iconv.3 which is still not in the "new look". Peng has sent a patch to fix it at 10/14/2014 03:39 PM, but the patch has not been applied.

Thanks for spotting that! Fixed now.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I hope that switching to the new branch does not present any inconvenience to you. Of course, with this change, now

No, it doesn't.

Good.

Cheers,

Michael

Signature · 7 lines
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html