linux-user/syscall.c: Free the vec[i] in failure processing code block
PATCH 1/1 linux-user/syscall.c: Free the vec[i] in failure processing code block
When failure occurs during allocating vec[i], also need free all allocated vec[i] in failure processing code block before return.
If error is EFAULT when "i == 0", vec[i].iov_base is NULL, then can just skip it, so can still use "while (--i >= 0)" for the free looping.
--- linux-user/syscall.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
linux-user/syscall.c +5 -0
@@ -1873,6 +1873,11 @@ static struct iovec *lock_iovec(int type, abi_ulong target_addr,return vec; fail: +while (--i >=0 ) { +if (tswapal (vec[i].iov_len) >0 ) { +unlock_user (vec[i].iov_base, base,0 ); + } + }unlock_user (target_vec, target_addr,0 ); fail2:free (vec);
Signature · 1 line
1.9.3 (Apple Git-50)
Quoted 16 lines · Chen Gang S
When failure occurs during allocating vec[i], also need free all allocated vec[i] in failure processing code block before return.
If error is EFAULT when "i == 0", vec[i].iov_base is NULL, then can just skip it, so can still use "while (--i >= 0)" for the free looping.
Signed-off-by Chen Gang <[email protected]>--- linux-user/syscall.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)linux-user/syscall.c +0
-0
linux-user/syscall.c static struct iovec *lock_iovec(int type, abi_ulong target_addr, · line 1878
Quoted 6 lines
linux-user/syscall.c +3
-0@@ -1873,6 +1873,11 @@ static struct iovec *lock_iovec(int type, abi_ulong target_addr,return vec; fail: +while (--i >=0 ) { +if (tswapal (vec[i].iov_len) >0 ) { +unlock_user (vec[i].iov_base, base,0 );
Oh, sorry, base is undefined here. I shall send patch v2 for it.
Quoted 6 lines
linux-user/syscall.c +2
-0+ } + }unlock_user (target_vec, target_addr,0 ); fail2:free (vec);
Signature · 3 lines
Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed