Question on Bonding driver
Subsystems (2)
Hi,
I am working to enable bonding driver on my hardware and trying to understand this.
I am using the alb mode. I create a bond interface with 2 ethernet interfaces. First one is the basic question about net driver itself and second is about bonding.
1. Each ethernet interface has a MAC address. The hardware has MAC filter and the driver fills the net_device's dev_addr with its MAC address before calling register_netdev() API. When the net core calls ndo_start(), is the low level driver responsible for setting up its MAC address in the MAC filter of the hardware or low level driver will be told to do so by upper layer. Or is it required to set it up as part of ndo_set_rx_mode() or ndo_set_mac_address()?
2. In the case of bonding, the bond interface MAC address is copied from the active slave's MAC address. Also it updates the dev_addr in the netdev struct of each of the slave with its own MAC address. So I assume, the device/NIC now needs to accept packets to its original MAC address as well the bond's MAC address. This is especially more important for the slave's that are not active slave as it can be target of packets from Peers as part of rlb. So for the slave that is not active slave, MAC filter needs to include its original hw address as well unless the slave is put to promiscuous mode. So I am trying to figure out how this is expected to work? All slaves put to promiscuous mode or MAC filter updated by slave driver to include MAC addresses it is expected to filter on (bond MAC address and its own MAC address)
Signature · 2 lines
Murali Karicheri Linux Kernel, Texas Instruments
Quoted 17 lines · Murali Karicheri
Hi,
I am working to enable bonding driver on my hardware and trying to understand this.
I am using the alb mode. I create a bond interface with 2 ethernet interfaces. First one is the basic question about net driver itself and second is about bonding.
1. Each ethernet interface has a MAC address. The hardware has MAC filter and the driver fills the net_device's
dev_addrwith its MAC address before callingregister_netdev()API. When the net core callsndo_start(), is the low level driver responsible for setting up its MAC address in the MAC filter of the hardware or low level driver will be told to do so by upper layer. Or is it required to set it up as part ofndo_set_rx_mode()orndo_set_mac_address()?
Quoted 12 lines
2. In the case of bonding, the bond interface MAC address is copied from the active slave's MAC address. Also it updates the
dev_addrin the netdev struct of each of the slave with its own MAC address. So I assume, the device/NIC now needs to accept packets to its original MAC address as well the bond's MAC address. This is especially more important for the slave's that are not active slave as it can be target of packets from Peers as part of rlb. So for the slave that is not active slave, MAC filter needs to include its original hw address as well unless the slave is put to promiscuous mode. So I am trying to figure out how this is expected to work? All slaves put to promiscuous mode or MAC filter updated by slave driver to include MAC addresses it is expected to filter on (bond MAC address and its own MAC address)
I'm travelling at the moment, but the short answer for #2 is
that the way the alb mode works is basically that the non-active slaves only receive for their own individual MAC. Peers within the L2 network are "assigned" to those slaves via tailored ARPs sent to the specific peers. The slaves do not generally go into promisc mode (there are exceptions during failover type events), nor are they programmed with multiple unicast MAC addreeses.
I'd suggest you look at rlb_update_client in bond_alb.c and the
functions that call it to understand the logic.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, [email protected]
Quoted 40 lines · Jay Vosburgh
Quoted 17 lines · Murali Karicheri
Hi,
I am working to enable bonding driver on my hardware and trying to understand this.
I am using the alb mode. I create a bond interface with 2 ethernet interfaces. First one is the basic question about net driver itself and second is about bonding.
1. Each ethernet interface has a MAC address. The hardware has MAC filter and the driver fills the net_device's
dev_addrwith its MAC address before callingregister_netdev()API. When the net core callsndo_start(), is the low level driver responsible for setting up its MAC address in the MAC filter of the hardware or low level driver will be told to do so by upper layer. Or is it required to set it up as part ofndo_set_rx_mode()orndo_set_mac_address()?Quoted 12 lines
2. In the case of bonding, the bond interface MAC address is copied from the active slave's MAC address. Also it updates the
dev_addrin the netdev struct of each of the slave with its own MAC address. So I assume, the device/NIC now needs to accept packets to its original MAC address as well the bond's MAC address. This is especially more important for the slave's that are not active slave as it can be target of packets from Peers as part of rlb. So for the slave that is not active slave, MAC filter needs to include its original hw address as well unless the slave is put to promiscuous mode. So I am trying to figure out how this is expected to work? All slaves put to promiscuous mode or MAC filter updated by slave driver to include MAC addresses it is expected to filter on (bond MAC address and its own MAC address)I'm travelling at the moment, but the short answer for #2 is
that the way the alb mode works is basically that the non-active slaves only receive for their own individual MAC. Peers within the L2 network are "assigned" to those slaves via tailored ARPs sent to the specific peers. The slaves do not generally go into promisc mode (there are exceptions during failover type events), nor are they programmed with multiple unicast MAC addreeses.
Quoted 2 lines
I'd suggest you look at
rlb_update_clientinbond_alb.cand the
functions that call it to understand the logic.
Thanks Jay. Will take a look.
Murali
Quoted 7 lines
-J---
-Jay Vosburgh, [email protected]
Signature · 2 lines
Murali Karicheri Linux Kernel, Texas Instruments