seccomp.2: Note that memory area is read-only
Hi Kees,
Ping!
Cheers,
Michael
Quoted 39 lines · Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Kees,
I recently was asked about the point below, and had to go check the code to be sure, since the man page said nothing. It would be good to have a confirmation: the
seccomp_databuffer supplied to a seccomp BPF program is read-only, right? (That is, one can't write to the buffer in order to change the arguments that a system call actually receives.)A small man page patch below.
Cheers,
Michael
man2/seccomp.2 +1
-2@@ -232,15 +232,15 @@ struct sock_filter { /* Filter block */ }; .fi .in When executing the instructions, the BPF program operates on the system call information made available (i.e., use the .BR BPF_ABS -addressing mode) as a buffer of the following form: +addressing mode) as a (read-only) buffer of the following form: .in +4n .nf struct seccomp_data { int nr; /* System call number */ __u32 arch; /* AUDIT_ARCH_* value (see <linux/audit.h>) */ --Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Signature · 7 lines
Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 7 lines · Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Kees,
I recently was asked about the point below, and had to go check the code to be sure, since the man page said nothing. It would be good to have a confirmation: the
seccomp_databuffer supplied to a seccomp BPF program is read-only, right? (That is, one can't write to the buffer in order to change the arguments that a system call actually receives.)
That's correct. If BPF even allows changing the data, it's not copied back to the syscall when it runs. Anything wanting to do things like that would need to use ptrace to catch the call an directly modify the registers before continuing with the call.
Quoted 2 lines
A small man page patch below.
Looks good, thanks!
-Kees
Quoted 30 lines
Cheers,
Michael
man2/seccomp.2 +1
-2@@ -232,15 +232,15 @@ struct sock_filter { /* Filter block */ }; .fi .in When executing the instructions, the BPF program operates on the system call information made available (i.e., use the .BR BPF_ABS -addressing mode) as a buffer of the following form: +addressing mode) as a (read-only) buffer of the following form: .in +4n .nf struct seccomp_data { int nr; /* System call number */ __u32 arch; /* AUDIT_ARCH_* value (see <linux/audit.h>) */ --Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Signature · 6 lines
Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 10 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 7 lines · Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Kees,
I recently was asked about the point below, and had to go check the code to be sure, since the man page said nothing. It would be good to have a confirmation: the
seccomp_databuffer supplied to a seccomp BPF program is read-only, right? (That is, one can't write to the buffer in order to change the arguments that a system call actually receives.)
Quoted 4 lines
That's correct. If BPF even allows changing the data, it's not copied back to the syscall when it runs. Anything wanting to do things like that would need to use ptrace to catch the call an directly modify the registers before continuing with the call.
Today BPF programs can only read from seccomp_data buffer. I think it would be an interesting feature to allow overwrite of syscall arguments by the program on the fly... sometime in the future.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 16 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 7 lines · Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Kees,
I recently was asked about the point below, and had to go check the code to be sure, since the man page said nothing. It would be good to have a confirmation: the
seccomp_databuffer supplied to a seccomp BPF program is read-only, right? (That is, one can't write to the buffer in order to change the arguments that a system call actually receives.)That's correct. If BPF even allows changing the data, it's not copied back to the syscall when it runs. Anything wanting to do things like that would need to use ptrace to catch the call an directly modify the registers before continuing with the call.
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
A small man page patch below.
Looks good, thanks!
Thanks, Kees!
Cheers,
Michael
Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 22 lines
man2/seccomp.2 +1
-2@@ -232,15 +232,15 @@ struct sock_filter { /* Filter block */ }; .fi .in When executing the instructions, the BPF program operates on the system call information made available (i.e., use the .BR BPF_ABS -addressing mode) as a buffer of the following form: +addressing mode) as a (read-only) buffer of the following form: .in +4n .nf struct seccomp_data { int nr; /* System call number */ __u32 arch; /* AUDIT_ARCH_* value (see <linux/audit.h>) */ --Quoted 3 lines
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
Signature · 7 lines
Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html