Skip to contentSkip to conversation

linux-can moderated?

DISCUSSION Oliver Hartkopp 2 participants 2 messages Apr 30, 2015 1 message not in the archive CAN network drivers

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw

Hi Jeppe

Quoted 8 lines · Jeppe Ledet-Pedersen

I just sent in my first kernel patch yesterday. It successfully found its way to the linux-kernel and netdev mailing lists:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1977865.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg326785.html

It should also have been cc'ed to [email protected], but as far as I can see, it hasn't showed up in the linux-can list archives.

Yes.

And it showed up there automatically:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=143032208916337&w=2

Quoted 2 lines

I
believe the patch has to go in through the linux-can tree?

Yes.

Marc (see CC) will pick it up and commit it to the linux-can git tree at:

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can.git/

where David Miller (net maintainer) will pull it from for upstream and stable trees.

So for CAN drivers linux-can ML is perfect.
No need for cross posting on Kernel/Netdev for CAN driver stuff.

Quoted 1 line

Is the list moderated for non-subscribers?

No.

Quoted 2 lines

At the time I sent the patch,
I wasn't subscribed to linux-can. Or did I do something else wrong?

No everything went fine :-)

Thanks for your contribution.

Best regards,
Oliver

#2 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Oliver Hartkopp

Hi Jeppe

Hi Oliver,

Quoted 8 lines · Jeppe Ledet-Pedersen
Quoted 7 lines

I just sent in my first kernel patch yesterday. It successfully found its way to the linux-kernel and netdev mailing lists:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1977865.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg326785.html

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

It should also have been cc'ed to [email protected], but as far as I can see, it hasn't showed up in the linux-can list archives.

Yes.

And it showed up there automatically:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=143032208916337&w=2

Ah, thanks. I was looking at the gmane archive of linux-can (linked from vger.kernel.org) for yesterday and couldn't find it.

http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-can
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/day=20150429

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I
believe the patch has to go in through the linux-can tree?

Yes.

Marc (see CC) will pick it up and commit it to the linux-can git tree at:

Quoted 7 lines

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can.git/

where David Miller (net maintainer) will pull it from for upstream and stable trees.

So for CAN drivers linux-can ML is perfect.
No need for cross posting on Kernel/Netdev for CAN driver stuff.

Ok, thanks for the clarification. I thought I had to send it to all addresses from the get_maintainer.pl script, but of course it makes more sense only to send it to the most specific list. Sorry for the noise :)

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line

Is the list moderated for non-subscribers?

No.

Quoted 2 lines

At the time I sent the patch,
I wasn't subscribed to linux-can. Or did I do something else wrong?

No everything went fine :-)

Great.

Quoted 1 line

Thanks for your contribution.

Thanks for explaining this - much appreciated!

-Jeppe