Skip to contentSkip to conversation

DocBook/media: fix querycap error code

PATCH In review Hans Verkuil 2 participants 3 messages May 6, 2015 – May 19, 2015

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 DocBook/media: fix querycap error code

The most likely error you will get when calling VIDIOC_QUERYCAP for a device node that does not support it is ENOTTY, not EINVAL.

---
 Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml +1 -1
index 20fda75..131abca 100644
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ kernel devices compatible with this specification and to obtain
 information about driver and hardware capabilities. The ioctl takes a
 pointer to a &v4l2-capability; which is filled by the driver. When the
 driver is not compatible with this specification the ioctl returns an
-&EINVAL;.</para>
+error, most likely the &ENOTTY;.</para>
 
     <table pgwide="1" frame="none" id="v4l2-capability">
       <title>struct <structname>v4l2_capability</structname></title>
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
#1 lore raw

Em Wed, 06 May 2015 08:35:43 +0200
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]> escreveu:

Quoted 13 lines

The most likely error you will get when calling VIDIOC_QUERYCAP for a device node that does not support it is ENOTTY, not EINVAL.

---
 Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml +0 -0
index 20fda75..131abca 100644

Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml kernel devices compatible with this specification and to obtain · line 57

Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml +1 -1
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ kernel devices compatible with this specification and to obtain
 information about driver and hardware capabilities. The ioctl takes a
 pointer to a &v4l2-capability; which is filled by the driver. When the
 driver is not compatible with this specification the ioctl returns an
-&EINVAL;.</para>
+error, most likely the &ENOTTY;.</para>

Hmm... "likely"...

This is not nice... This is an specification. It should properly define the error code, and not let the user to guess.

This should be, instead:
"All V4L2 drivers should support VIDIOC_QUERYCAP."

The Documentation already points to to the generic error codes, with would actually happen only in the case something goes deadly wrong. There are very few error codes that could actually happen on this point, like EFAULT, if, for some reason, the Kernel fails to copy data to userspace, or ENODEV is a device got removed.

Of course, if onse sends this ioctl to a non-v4l2 device, an error code will be returned, but the actual error code will depend on the device where this is sent, as, except if one janitor did a huge changeset fixing this, I'm almost sure that not all devices will return ENOTTY when an ioctl is not implemented.

Yet, for userspace, it is safe to assume that, if VIDIOC_QUERYCAP fails, either the device is not V4L2 or the V4L2 device won't work anyway, as there's something really broken there.

Regards,
Mauro

Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml +0 -0
     <table pgwide="1" frame="none" id="v4l2-capability">
       <title>struct <structname>v4l2_capability</structname></title>
#2 lore raw
Quoted 24 lines · Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Em Wed, 06 May 2015 08:35:43 +0200
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]> escreveu:

Quoted 13 lines

The most likely error you will get when calling VIDIOC_QUERYCAP for a device node that does not support it is ENOTTY, not EINVAL.

---
 Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml +0 -0
index 20fda75..131abca 100644

Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml kernel devices compatible with this specification and to obtain · line 57

Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml +1 -1
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ kernel devices compatible with this specification and to obtain
 information about driver and hardware capabilities. The ioctl takes a
 pointer to a &v4l2-capability; which is filled by the driver. When the
 driver is not compatible with this specification the ioctl returns an
-&EINVAL;.</para>
+error, most likely the &ENOTTY;.</para>

Hmm... "likely"...

Quoted 5 lines

This is not nice... This is an specification. It should properly define the error code, and not let the user to guess.

This should be, instead:
"All V4L2 drivers should support VIDIOC_QUERYCAP."

That's what the first line of this QUERYCAP page says. If you are a V4L2 driver, then this ioctl will be supported. This patch is about what happens when you give it to a non-v4l2 driver.

Quoted 13 lines

The Documentation already points to to the generic error codes, with would actually happen only in the case something goes deadly wrong. There are very few error codes that could actually happen on this point, like EFAULT, if, for some reason, the Kernel fails to copy data to userspace, or ENODEV is a device got removed.

Of course, if onse sends this ioctl to a non-v4l2 device, an error code will be returned, but the actual error code will depend on the device where this is sent, as, except if one janitor did a huge changeset fixing this, I'm almost sure that not all devices will return ENOTTY when an ioctl is not implemented.

Quoted 3 lines

Yet, for userspace, it is safe to assume that, if VIDIOC_QUERYCAP fails, either the device is not V4L2 or the V4L2 device won't work anyway, as there's something really broken there.

Right. So which is why I made the change: we don't control what other subsystems do, so all I can say is that you get an error back, which is most likely ENOTTY.

Since what such a subsystem returns is out of scope of the spec, I cannot say that it will be one specific error (after all, we returned EINVAL for a long time instead of ENOTTY when we got an unknown ioctl).

So I don't see the problem with this patch.

If you prefer I can change it to: "...returns an error, either the &ENOTTY; or the &EINVAL;."

I would be comfortable with that since those two are the main possibilities.

Regards,

Hans

Quoted 8 lines

Regards,
Mauro

Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-querycap.xml +0 -0
     <table pgwide="1" frame="none" id="v4l2-capability">
       <title>struct <structname>v4l2_capability</structname></title>