v4l2-dv-timings: support interlaced in v4l2_print_dv_timings
PATCH 1/1 v4l2-dv-timings: support interlaced in v4l2_print_dv_timings
The v4l2_print_dv_timings() didn't log the interlaced format correctly. The timings for the bottom field weren't logged and the fields per second value was half of what it should have been.
Signed-off-by Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dv-timings.c +7 -0
@@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ void v4l2_print_dv_timings(const char *dev_prefix, const char *prefix, htot =V4L2_DV_BT_FRAME_WIDTH (bt); vtot =V4L2_DV_BT_FRAME_HEIGHT (bt); +if (bt->interlaced) + vtot /=2 ;if (prefix ==NULL ) prefix ="" ;
@@ -282,6 +284,11 @@ void v4l2_print_dv_timings(const char *dev_prefix, const char *prefix, dev_prefix, bt->vfrontporch, (bt->polarities &V4L2_DV_VSYNC_POS_POL ) ?"+" :"-" , bt->vsync, bt->vbackporch); +if (bt->interlaced) +pr_info ("%s: vertical bottom field: fp = %u, %ssync = %u, bp = %u\n" , + dev_prefix, bt->il_vfrontporch, + (bt->polarities &V4L2_DV_VSYNC_POS_POL ) ?"+" :"-" , + bt->il_vsync, bt->il_vbackporch);pr_info ("%s: pixelclock: %llu\n" , dev_prefix, bt->pixelclock); pr_info("%s: flags (0x%x):%s%s%s%s%s\n", dev_prefix, bt->flags, (bt->flags & V4L2_DV_FL_REDUCED_BLANKING) ?