nvme-cli format timeout
Hi,
I am aware of some NVMe drives that take well over 60 seconds to perform a format and therefore timeout during the format command issued by nvme-cli.
We might want to consider increasing the timeout. The following patch is an example to show what I mean.
Thanks.
nvme.c +3 -0
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@#define min (x, y) (x) > (y) ? (y) : (x) +#define FORMAT_TIMEOUT 120000 // 120 seconds +static int fd;static struct stat nvme_stat;static const char *devicename;
@@ -2132,6 +2134,7 @@ static int format(int argc, char **argv) cmd.opcode = nvme_admin_format_nvm; cmd.nsid = cfg.namespace_id; cmd.cdw10 = (cfg.lbaf <<0 ) | (cfg.ms <<4 ) | (cfg.pi <<5 ) | (cfg.pil <<8 ) | (cfg.ses <<9 ); + cmd.timeout_ms =FORMAT_TIMEOUT ; err =ioctl (fd,NVME_IOCTL_ADMIN_CMD , &cmd);if (err <0 )
Quoted 7 lines · Paul Grabinar
Hi,
I am aware of some NVMe drives that take well over 60 seconds to perform a format and therefore timeout during the format command issued by nvme-cli.
We might want to consider increasing the timeout. The following patch is an example to show what I mean.
Good idea. We should probably make this a parameter as well as up the timeout. Only the passthru command takes the timeout request as a parameter for some reason.
If you want to post a pull request on github, we can apply it from there.
Quoted 7 lines · Keith Busch
Quoted 6 lines · Paul Grabinar
Hi,
I am aware of some NVMe drives that take well over 60 seconds to perform a format and therefore timeout during the format command issued by nvme-cli.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines
We might want to consider increasing the timeout. The following patch is an example to show what I mean.
Good idea. We should probably make this a parameter as well as up the timeout. Only the passthru command takes the timeout request as a parameter for some reason.
If you want to post a pull request on github, we can apply it from there.
Thanks.
I'll post a pull request. As you say though, having a timeout parameter would probably be even better.