LPC32xx changes
Hello Tom,
today I've opened U-boot patchwork and found that almost all my recent changes sent to U-boot mailing list are assigned to you. Would it be possible for you to review/apply them?
As for today the collective work on LPC32xx support is significantly impeded.
For your convenience this is a list of links to patchwork:
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/489100/
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/489190/
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/491419/
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/491420/
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/497296/
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/497308/
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/497298/
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/497299/
* https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/506182/
Thank you in advance.
Signature · 2 lines
With best wishes, Vladimir
Quoted 8 lines · Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hello Tom,
today I've opened U-boot patchwork and found that almost all my recent changes sent to U-boot mailing list are assigned to you. Would it be possible for you to review/apply them?
As for today the collective work on LPC32xx support is significantly impeded.
Yes, I've moved them over to myself with the plan to apply them soon. Note that I like to wait a bit after last posting to ensure that everyone that would chime in has chimed in so that last patch might not get applied soon. Thanks again!
Signature · 8 lines
Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150811/0dbfbad5/attachment.sig>
LEMIEUX
Hi Toni,
Do you know who will review and accept the other patches in the "LPC32xx: enhancement and update" series that were not review?
For your convenience this is a list of links to patchwork:
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500510/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500512/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500513/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500511/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500514/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500515/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500516/
For the original LPC32xx, submitted by Vladimir during the merge window, and already reviewed, it will be beneficial if they can be apply, as I am building on top of them.
Sylvain Lemieux
Quoted 15 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rini [mailto:trini at konsulko.com]
Sent: 11-Aug-15 1:42 PMQuoted 8 lines · Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hello Tom,
today I've opened U-boot patchwork and found that almost all my recent changes sent to U-boot mailing list are assigned to you. Would it be possible for you to review/apply them?
As for today the collective work on LPC32xx support is significantly impeded.
Quoted 7 lines
Yes, I've moved them over to myself with the plan to apply them soon. Note that I like to wait a bit after last posting to ensure that everyone that would chime in has chimed in so that last patch might not get applied soon. Thanks again!
--
Tom
________________________________
This e-mail contains privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressees named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in respect of any information contained in it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and immediately destroy this e-mail and its attachments.
Quoted 14 lines · SYLVAIN
Hi Toni,
Do you know who will review and accept the other patches in the "LPC32xx: enhancement and update" series that were not review?
For your convenience this is a list of links to patchwork:
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500510/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500512/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500513/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500511/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500514/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500515/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/500516/
Quoted 3 lines
For the original LPC32xx, submitted by Vladimir during the merge window, and already reviewed, it will be beneficial if they can be apply, as I am building on top of them.
Yes, I'll review these as well, thanks.
Signature · 8 lines
Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150811/0bace6ef/attachment.sig>