Skip to contentSkip to conversation

spi: s3c64xx: replace clock disabling with runtime PM suspend call in remove function

PATCH RESEND In review Heiner Kallweit 2 participants 2 messages Aug 20, 2015 – Aug 21, 2015

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH RESEND 4/4 spi: s3c64xx: replace clock disabling with runtime PM suspend call in remove function

Simplify s3c64xx_spi_remove by replacing the clock disabling with calling runtime PM suspend which does the same.
Waking up the device if it was suspended wouldn't be strictly needed for this driver but using pm_runtime_get_sync is cleaner and makes s3c64xx_spi_remove more consistent with the runtime PM handling in s3c64xx_spi_setup.

pm_runtime_force_suspend does most of the work for us:
disabling the clocks, disabling runtime PM and setting it to "suspended" state.

---
Changed:
- Added to the patch set

 drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c +3 -4
index 735b7f5..4a91a6c 100644
@@ -1225,13 +1225,12 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct spi_master *master = spi_master_get(platform_get_drvdata(pdev));
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
-	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+	pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
 
 	writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_INT_EN);
 
-	clk_disable_unprepare(sdd->src_clk);
-
-	clk_disable_unprepare(sdd->clk);
+	pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+	pm_runtime_force_suspend(&pdev->dev);
 
 	return 0;
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.5.0
#1 lore raw
Quoted 30 lines · Heiner Kallweit

Simplify s3c64xx_spi_remove by replacing the clock disabling with calling runtime PM suspend which does the same.
Waking up the device if it was suspended wouldn't be strictly needed for this driver but using pm_runtime_get_sync is cleaner and makes s3c64xx_spi_remove more consistent with the runtime PM handling in s3c64xx_spi_setup.

pm_runtime_force_suspend does most of the work for us:
disabling the clocks, disabling runtime PM and setting it to "suspended" state.

---
Changed:
- Added to the patch set

 drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c +1 -1
index 735b7f5..4a91a6c 100644
@@ -1225,13 +1225,12 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct spi_master *master = spi_master_get(platform_get_drvdata(pdev));
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
-	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+	pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
 

drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c static int s3c64xx_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 1236

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c +2 -3
 	writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_INT_EN);
 
-	clk_disable_unprepare(sdd->src_clk);
-
-	clk_disable_unprepare(sdd->clk);
+	pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+	pm_runtime_force_suspend(&pdev->dev);
 
 	return 0;
 }

The get+put_noidle looks good. But replacing this with pm_runtime_force_suspend() does not.

The device is going to be removed so we do not want to do anything with it any more. We do not want to suspend it. Probably this would work fine but it is not intuitive. I think it's better to just:
get(), disable(), set_suspended(), put_noidle()

Best regards,
Krzysztof