Current status of MC patches?
Hi Mauro,
Can you give an update of the current status of the MC work? To be honest, I've lost track.
In particular, is there anything I and/or others need to review before you can start merging patches?
This is also relevant for the workshop agenda. I plan to put any MC topics at the end of the workshop. As you mentioned in a mail exchange with Shuah, as long as these patches aren't merged there is not all that much point in discussing future work.
Regards,
Hans
Em Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:08:33 +0200
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]> escreveu:
Quoted 7 lines
Hi Mauro,
Can you give an update of the current status of the MC work? To be honest, I've lost track.
In particular, is there anything I and/or others need to review before you can start merging patches?
Basically, we're still waiting for Laurent and Sakari's review.
Quoted 4 lines
This is also relevant for the workshop agenda. I plan to put any MC topics at the end of the workshop. As you mentioned in a mail exchange with Shuah, as long as these patches aren't merged there is not all that much point in discussing future work.
Yep. There's no sense to even discuss MC at the workshop while the current work is not reviewed, as the other MC topic for discussion is related to dynamic support, to be added after the MC next gen support for G_TOPOLOGY.
Regards,
Mauro
Hi Mauro and Hans,
Quoted 5 lines · Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:08:33 +0200
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]> escreveu:Quoted 2 lines
Hi Mauro,
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Can you give an update of the current status of the MC work? To be honest, I've lost track.
In particular, is there anything I and/or others need to review before you can start merging patches?
Basically, we're still waiting for Laurent and Sakari's review.
Could you resend what you have to the list, please? Currently it's a number of sets some of which contain updates only on particular patches. It'd be easier to review that way.
I've been working on top of the set to add support for unlimited number of entities, so unfortunately I've had less time for reviews. These patches are still required before the rest can be applied so I've priorised them.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
This is also relevant for the workshop agenda. I plan to put any MC topics at the end of the workshop. As you mentioned in a mail exchange with Shuah, as long as these patches aren't merged there is not all that much point in discussing future work.
Yep. There's no sense to even discuss MC at the workshop while the current work is not reviewed, as the other MC topic for discussion is related to dynamic support, to be added after the MC next gen support for
G_TOPOLOGY.
Signature · 4 lines
Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: [email protected] XMPP: [email protected]
Quoted 11 lines · Sakari Ailus
Hi Mauro and Hans,
Quoted 8 lines · Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:08:33 +0200
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]> escreveu:Quoted 5 lines
Hi Mauro,
Can you give an update of the current status of the MC work? To be honest, I've lost track.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
In particular, is there anything I and/or others need to review before you can start merging patches?
Basically, we're still waiting for Laurent and Sakari's review.
Could you resend what you have to the list, please? Currently it's a number of sets some of which contain updates only on particular patches. It'd be easier to review that way.
I would actually appreciate that as well. That way I can see which patches I have and which I haven't reviewed.
If you don't want to spam the ml, then you can also send it directly, but I think it is OK to include the ml. Up to you, though.
Regards,
Hans
Quoted 15 lines
I've been working on top of the set to add support for unlimited number of entities, so unfortunately I've had less time for reviews. These patches are still required before the rest can be applied so I've priorised them.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
This is also relevant for the workshop agenda. I plan to put any MC topics at the end of the workshop. As you mentioned in a mail exchange with Shuah, as long as these patches aren't merged there is not all that much point in discussing future work.
Yep. There's no sense to even discuss MC at the workshop while the current work is not reviewed, as the other MC topic for discussion is related to dynamic support, to be added after the MC next gen support for
G_TOPOLOGY.
Em Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:20:49 +0200
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]> escreveu:
Quoted 21 lines · Sakari Ailus
Quoted 11 lines
Hi Mauro and Hans,
Quoted 8 lines · Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:08:33 +0200
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]> escreveu:Quoted 5 lines
Hi Mauro,
Can you give an update of the current status of the MC work? To be honest, I've lost track.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
In particular, is there anything I and/or others need to review before you can start merging patches?
Basically, we're still waiting for Laurent and Sakari's review.
Could you resend what you have to the list, please? Currently it's a number of sets some of which contain updates only on particular patches. It'd be easier to review that way.
Quoted 5 lines
I would actually appreciate that as well. That way I can see which patches I have and which I haven't reviewed.
If you don't want to spam the ml, then you can also send it directly, but I think it is OK to include the ml. Up to you, though.
Let me send the patches then to the Workshop ML. There are 83 patches. That's too many to flood at the main list, specially since all patches there are already at the main ML.
Regards,
Mauro