Does dt property name in a binding always need a vendor prefix?
Experts,
I am looking for guidelines to name a DT property in a bindings. Do we need to add a vendor specific prefix always or is it needed only specific cases? I know the intent here is to avoid name space collision. But by name space I assume, within a specific a device binding. For example where device driver has a core framework that also uses DT properties, any low level device driver using the framework needs to add a vendor specific prefix to avoid collision. Is my understanding correct? So standalone device drivers doesn't have to use prefix? Right?
Signature · 6 lines
Murali Karicheri Linux Kernel, Keystone -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html