Skip to contentSkip to conversation

DaVinci fixes for v4.5

GIT PULL Applied Sekhar Nori 2 participants 2 messages Dec 15, 2015 – Dec 22, 2015

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi,

Here are couple of fixes I collected for v4.5

Thanks,
Sekhar

The following changes since commit 8005c49d9aea74d382f474ce11afbbc7d7130bec:

Linux 4.4-rc1 (2015-11-15 17:00:27 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsekhar/linux-davinci.git tags/davinci-for-v4.5/fixes

for you to fetch changes up to 5bcd927233d18fbfabed461b31b0118147648525:

ARM: davinci: fix a problematic usage of WARN() (2015-12-15 15:29:34 +0530)

----------------------------------------------------------------
This pull request includes a fix for
improper usage of WARN() and a fix
for unmet 'select' dependencies.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Arnd Bergmann (1):
ARM: davinci: only select WT cache if cache is enabled

Geliang Tang (1):
ARM: davinci: fix a problematic usage of WARN()

 arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig               | 3 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c     | 4 +---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-leopard.c | 4 +---
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
#1 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Sekhar Nori

Hi,

Here are couple of fixes I collected for v4.5

Thanks,
Sekhar

The following changes since commit 8005c49d9aea74d382f474ce11afbbc7d7130bec:

Linux 4.4-rc1 (2015-11-15 17:00:27 -0800)

Quoted 7 lines

are available in the git repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsekhar/linux-davinci.git tags/davinci-for-v4.5/fixes

for you to fetch changes up to 5bcd927233d18fbfabed461b31b0118147648525:

ARM: davinci: fix a problematic usage of WARN() (2015-12-15 15:29:34 +0530)

Merged, thanks.

Quoted 5 lines

----------------------------------------------------------------
This pull request includes a fix for
improper usage of WARN() and a fix
for unmet 'select' dependencies.

Feel free to use up to 70-80 characters per line or so. No need to linewrap quite that early. :-)

-Olof