ARM: dts: exynos-5422-odroid: Remove always_on for eMMC and SD regulators
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 ARM: dts: exynos-5422-odroid: Remove always_on for eMMC and SD regulators
Allow these suplies to be switched off if not used.
---
Tested with eMMC only on XU4.
SD still needs testing.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi +0 -4
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ regulator-name = "vddq_mmc0"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; - regulator-always-on; }; ldo5_reg: LDO5 {
@@ -204,7 +203,6 @@ regulator-name = "vddq_mmc2"; regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-always-on; }; ldo15_reg: LDO15 {
@@ -232,14 +230,12 @@ regulator-name = "vdd_emmc_1V8"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; - regulator-always-on; }; ldo19_reg: LDO19 { regulator-name = "vdd_sd"; regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-always-on; }; ldo24_reg: LDO24 {
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
Quoted 1 line · Markus Reichl
Allow these suplies to be switched off if not used.
s/suplies/supplies/
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Markus Reichl <[email protected]>---
Tested with eMMC only on XU4.
SD still needs testing.
I wanted to test your patches but the first does not apply (next-20160401, my for-next) so I gave up.
I think this patch should be squashed with previous one. I don't see benefits of splitting this (but maybe I am missing something?).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof,
Am 04.04.2016 um 02:37 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
Quoted 4 lines · Markus Reichl
Quoted 1 line
Allow these suplies to be switched off if not used.
s/suplies/supplies/
Will correct it.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Markus Reichl <[email protected]>---
Tested with eMMC only on XU4.
SD still needs testing.I wanted to test your patches but the first does not apply (next-20160401, my for-next) so I gave up.
Will check and base on next-20160401.
Quoted 3 lines
I think this patch should be squashed with previous one. I don't see benefits of splitting this (but maybe I am missing something?).
Will sqash them into one.
Quoted 4 lines
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Servus,
--
Markus Reichl