Bluetooth: btusb: Update firmware filename for Intel 9x60 and,later
Marcel Holtmann
maintainerHi Jaya,
Quoted 36 lines
The format of Intel Bluetooth firmware for bootloader product is ibt-<hw_variant>-<device_revision_id>.sfi and .ddc.
But for the SKU's 9x60, there a 3 variants of FW, which cannot be differentiated just with
hw_variantanddevision_revision_id. So to pick the appropriate FW file for 9x60 SKU's, it will be differentiated usinghw_variant,hw_revisionandfw_revisionrather thanhw_variantanddevice_revision_idonly.Format will be like this:
ibt-<hw_variant>-<hw_revision>-<fw_revision>.sfi and .ddcSigned-off-by Jaya P G <[email protected]>---
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c| 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c +4
-1@@ -2151,20 +2151,36 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel_new(struct hci_dev *hdev) }/* With this Intel bootloader only the hardware variant and device -* revision information are used to select the right firmware. +* revision information are used to select the right firmware for SfP +* and WsP. * * The firmware filename is ibt-<hw_variant>-<dev_revid>.sfi. * * Currently the supported hardware variants are: * 11 (0x0b) for iBT3.0 (LnP/SfP) * 12 (0x0c) for iBT3.5 (WsP) +* +* For ThP/JfP and for future SKU's, the FW name varies based on HW
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c static int btusb_setup_intel_new(struct hci_dev *hdev) · line 2173
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c +7
-0+* variant, HW revision and FW revision, as these are dependent on CNVi +* and RF Combination. +* * 17 (0x11) for iBT3.5 (JfP) * 18 (0x12) for iBT3.5 (ThP) +* +* The firmware file name for these will be +* ibt-<hw_variant>-<hw_revision>-<fw_revision>.sfi. +* */
can you send me the btmon binary traces that include the version information. One from bootloader and also from operational firmware. With the firmware issue currently discussed, we need to make sure that we can find the right firmware name based on information provided by the bootloader, but also from operational firmware.
I frankly don’t like including fw_revision in here. We should solely build the name based on hardware information.
Regards
Marcel
PATCH 1/1 Bluetooth: btusb: Update firmware filename for Intel 9x60 and,later
From: Jaya P G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:51:26 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Update firmware filename for Intel 9x60 and
later
The format of Intel Bluetooth firmware for bootloader product is ibt-<hw_variant>-<device_revision_id>.sfi and .ddc.
But for the SKU's 9x60, there a 3 variants of FW, which cannot be differentiated just with hw_variant and devision_revision_id. So to pick the appropriate FW file for 9x60 SKU's, it will be differentiated using hw_variant, hw_revision and fw_revision rather than hw_variant and device_revision_id only.
Format will be like this:
ibt-<hw_variant>-<hw_revision>-<fw_revision>.sfi and .ddc
--- drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c +31 -9
@@ -2151,20 +2151,36 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel_new(struct hci_dev *hdev) }/* With this Intel bootloader only the hardware variant and device -* revision information are used to select the right firmware. +* revision information are used to select the right firmware for SfP +* and WsP. * * The firmware filename is ibt-<hw_variant>-<dev_revid>.sfi. * * Currently the supported hardware variants are: * 11 (0x0b) for iBT3.0 (LnP/SfP) * 12 (0x0c) for iBT3.5 (WsP) +* +* For ThP/JfP and for future SKU's, the FW name varies based on HW +* variant, HW revision and FW revision, as these are dependent on CNVi +* and RF Combination. +* * 17 (0x11) for iBT3.5 (JfP) * 18 (0x12) for iBT3.5 (ThP) +* +* The firmware file name for these will be +* ibt-<hw_variant>-<hw_revision>-<fw_revision>.sfi. +* */ -snprintf (fwname,sizeof (fwname),"intel/ibt-%u-%u.sfi" , -le16_to_cpu (ver.hw_variant), -le16_to_cpu (params->dev_revid)); - +if (ver.hw_variant >=0x11 ) { +snprintf (fwname,sizeof (fwname),"intel/ibt-%u-%u-%u.sfi" , +le16_to_cpu (ver.hw_variant), +le16_to_cpu (ver.hw_revision), +le16_to_cpu (ver.fw_revision)); + }else { +snprintf (fwname,sizeof (fwname),"intel/ibt-%u-%u.sfi" , +le16_to_cpu (ver.hw_variant), +le16_to_cpu (params->dev_revid)); + } err =request_firmware (&fw, fwname, &hdev->dev);if (err <0 ) { BT_ERR("%s: Failed to load Intel firmware file (%d)",
@@ -2178,10 +2194,16 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel_new(struct hci_dev *hdev)/* Save the DDC file name for later use to apply once the firmware * downloading is done. */ -snprintf (fwname,sizeof (fwname),"intel/ibt-%u-%u.ddc" , -le16_to_cpu (ver.hw_variant), -le16_to_cpu (params->dev_revid)); - +if (ver.hw_variant >=0x11 ) { +snprintf (fwname,sizeof (fwname),"intel/ibt-%u-%u-%u.ddc" , +le16_to_cpu (ver.hw_variant), +le16_to_cpu (ver.hw_revision), +le16_to_cpu (ver.fw_revision)); + }else { +snprintf (fwname,sizeof (fwname),"intel/ibt-%u-%u.ddc" , +le16_to_cpu (ver.hw_variant), +le16_to_cpu (params->dev_revid)); + }kfree_skb (skb);if (fw->size <644 ) {
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Johan Hedberg
AppliedHi Jaya,
Quoted 14 lines · jaya.p.g
From: Jaya P G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:51:26 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Update firmware filename for Intel 9x60 and
laterThe format of Intel Bluetooth firmware for bootloader product is ibt-<hw_variant>-<device_revision_id>.sfi and .ddc.
But for the SKU's 9x60, there a 3 variants of FW, which cannot be differentiated just with
hw_variantanddevision_revision_id. So to pick the appropriate FW file for 9x60 SKU's, it will be differentiated usinghw_variant,hw_revisionandfw_revisionrather thanhw_variantanddevice_revision_idonly.
Quoted 7 lines
Format will be like this:
ibt-<hw_variant>-<hw_revision>-<fw_revision>.sfi and .ddcSigned-off-by Jaya P G <[email protected]>--- drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Applied to bluetooth-next. Thanks.
Johan